A comparative analysis of the characterization, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of oak tasar (Antheraea proylei) and mulberry (Bombyx mori) pupae oils

Kusumala Suman, Venkatesh Kumar R.
{"title":"A comparative analysis of the characterization, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of oak tasar (Antheraea proylei) and mulberry (Bombyx mori) pupae oils","authors":"Kusumala Suman,&nbsp;Venkatesh Kumar R.","doi":"10.1016/j.prenap.2024.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Silkworm pupae oils have emerged as a great source of functional fatty acids in recent days. However, certain wild races of silkworm pupae are yet to be explored to know their potentiality in human health. Therefore, the current study aims to validate their efficacy towards therapeutic values through a comparative analysis between two races of silkworm pupae oil, namely, oak tasar pupae oil (OTPO) and mulberry silkworm pupae oil (MSPO). The pupae oils were extracted using the Soxhlet method followed by the fatty acids profile and functional group analysis using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) respectively. The radical scavenging activities of both oils were determined by 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH). Further, both the oils were tested for their antibacterial activity using the agar well diffusion method. The oil yield was recorded as 24.62 ± 0.341 % and 24.16 ± 0.764 % for OTPO and MSPO respectively. GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of conjugated linoleic acid (ω-6 fatty acids) as a prominent component in both OTPO (23.49 %) and MSPO (37.99 %), followed by other bioactive constituents in minor amounts. The FTIR analysis and chemical properties correlated to the peaks of common edible oils. Meanwhile, MSPO (150.50±0.45 μg/mL) had a higher TPC when compared to OTPO (44.599±0.514 μg/mL). Moreover, OTPO showed better radical scavenging properties than MSPO. Further, OTPO exhibited antibacterial activity against <em>E. coli, E. cloacae, and S. typhi</em> at different dilutions. However, MSPO was found to be ineffective against the tested bacterial strains. In conclusion, the present study indicates that both oils could be used as an alternative edible oil source as well as a therapeutic agent in the near future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101014,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Research - Natural Products","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Research - Natural Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950199724000740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Silkworm pupae oils have emerged as a great source of functional fatty acids in recent days. However, certain wild races of silkworm pupae are yet to be explored to know their potentiality in human health. Therefore, the current study aims to validate their efficacy towards therapeutic values through a comparative analysis between two races of silkworm pupae oil, namely, oak tasar pupae oil (OTPO) and mulberry silkworm pupae oil (MSPO). The pupae oils were extracted using the Soxhlet method followed by the fatty acids profile and functional group analysis using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) respectively. The radical scavenging activities of both oils were determined by 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH). Further, both the oils were tested for their antibacterial activity using the agar well diffusion method. The oil yield was recorded as 24.62 ± 0.341 % and 24.16 ± 0.764 % for OTPO and MSPO respectively. GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of conjugated linoleic acid (ω-6 fatty acids) as a prominent component in both OTPO (23.49 %) and MSPO (37.99 %), followed by other bioactive constituents in minor amounts. The FTIR analysis and chemical properties correlated to the peaks of common edible oils. Meanwhile, MSPO (150.50±0.45 μg/mL) had a higher TPC when compared to OTPO (44.599±0.514 μg/mL). Moreover, OTPO showed better radical scavenging properties than MSPO. Further, OTPO exhibited antibacterial activity against E. coli, E. cloacae, and S. typhi at different dilutions. However, MSPO was found to be ineffective against the tested bacterial strains. In conclusion, the present study indicates that both oils could be used as an alternative edible oil source as well as a therapeutic agent in the near future.

栎树塔萨(Antheraea proylei)和桑树(Bombyx mori)蛹油的特性、抗菌性和抗氧化性比较分析
近年来,蚕蛹油已成为功能性脂肪酸的重要来源。然而,某些野生蚕蛹品种在人类健康方面的潜力还有待探索。因此,本研究旨在通过对两种蚕蛹油(即橡树蚕蛹油(OTPO)和桑蚕蛹油(MSPO))进行比较分析,验证它们对治疗价值的功效。蚕蛹油采用索氏提取法提取,然后分别使用气相色谱质谱法(GC-MS)和傅立叶变换红外光谱法(FTIR)进行脂肪酸谱和官能团分析。2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) 和 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) 测定了两种油的自由基清除活性。此外,还使用琼脂井扩散法测试了这两种精油的抗菌活性。OTPO 和 MSPO 的产油量分别为 24.62 ± 0.341 % 和 24.16 ± 0.764 %。气相色谱-质谱分析显示,共轭亚油酸(ω-6 脂肪酸)是 OTPO(23.49 %)和 MSPO(37.99 %)中的主要成分,其他生物活性成分含量较少。傅立叶变换红外分析和化学特性与常见食用油的峰值相关。同时,与 OTPO(44.599±0.514 μg/mL)相比,MSPO(150.50±0.45 μg/mL)具有更高的 TPC。此外,OTPO 比 MSPO 表现出更好的自由基清除特性。此外,在不同稀释度下,OTPO 对大肠杆菌、泄殖腔大肠杆菌和伤寒杆菌具有抗菌活性。然而,研究发现 MSPO 对测试的细菌菌株无效。总之,本研究表明,这两种油在不久的将来可用作替代食用油来源和治疗剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信