Flexible and synergistic methanol production via biomass gasification and natural gas reforming

Mohammad Ostadi , Leslie Bromberg , Guiyan Zang , Daniel R. Cohn , Emre Gençer
{"title":"Flexible and synergistic methanol production via biomass gasification and natural gas reforming","authors":"Mohammad Ostadi ,&nbsp;Leslie Bromberg ,&nbsp;Guiyan Zang ,&nbsp;Daniel R. Cohn ,&nbsp;Emre Gençer","doi":"10.1016/j.clce.2024.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable liquid fuels are essential for decarbonization of various means of transportation which are challenging to address through electrification or hydrogen use. A possible method for producing low-carbon liquid fuel is through the thermochemical biomass to liquid (BTL) process. In this study, we conduct a technoeconomic-environmental analysis of two processes which take advantage of integration of natural gas reforming and biomass gasification, with the objective of improving the economics. By integrating H<sub>2</sub>-rich syngas (a mixture of H<sub>2</sub>/CO) obtained from natural gas reforming with carbon-rich syngas from biomass gasification, we harness synergistic effects. This combination allows us to achieve the optimal H<sub>2</sub>/CO ratio required for methanol synthesis, while also ensuring efficient carbon utilization. In the first design, natural gas is reformed in an autothermal reformer (ATR) to produce syngas. A Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) is utilized to supply the O<sub>2</sub> for both gasification and reforming processes. The H<sub>2</sub> produced by the SOEC adjusts the H<sub>2</sub> content in the syngas before the methanol synthesis reactor. In the second design, natural gas is reformed in a gas-heated-reformer (GHR) before an ATR, while an Air Separation Unit (ASU) produces the O<sub>2</sub> for the process. As a benchmark, the economics and flexible operation of both processes are compared to a conventional BTL process. In addition, the techno-economic impact of operating in biomass-only or natural gas-only modes are investigated. For a 134 MW<sub>th</sub> plant with 50 % of entering carbon from biomass, the levelized cost of methanol (LCOMeOH) of ATR+SOEC case is 34 % higher than the BTL reference case, while that of ATR+GHR case is 24 % lower than the BTL reference case. A lifecycle analysis (LCA) is conducted for these designs. Utilizing renewable electricity and 50 % biogenic carbon, the ATR+SOEC case emits 908 kgCO<sub>2e</sub> /tonne MeOH for a 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP), while the ATR+GHR case emits 721 kgCO<sub>2e</sub> /tonne MeOH. For a 20-year GWP, these emissions are 1055 and 915 kgCO<sub>2e</sub> /tonne MeOH, respectively. These emissions correspond to more than 50 % reduction in LCA emissions when compared to natural gas based LCA emissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100251,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782324000056/pdfft?md5=a66e9e4ebf5394b1fbf1420dce8c099a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772782324000056-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782324000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable liquid fuels are essential for decarbonization of various means of transportation which are challenging to address through electrification or hydrogen use. A possible method for producing low-carbon liquid fuel is through the thermochemical biomass to liquid (BTL) process. In this study, we conduct a technoeconomic-environmental analysis of two processes which take advantage of integration of natural gas reforming and biomass gasification, with the objective of improving the economics. By integrating H2-rich syngas (a mixture of H2/CO) obtained from natural gas reforming with carbon-rich syngas from biomass gasification, we harness synergistic effects. This combination allows us to achieve the optimal H2/CO ratio required for methanol synthesis, while also ensuring efficient carbon utilization. In the first design, natural gas is reformed in an autothermal reformer (ATR) to produce syngas. A Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) is utilized to supply the O2 for both gasification and reforming processes. The H2 produced by the SOEC adjusts the H2 content in the syngas before the methanol synthesis reactor. In the second design, natural gas is reformed in a gas-heated-reformer (GHR) before an ATR, while an Air Separation Unit (ASU) produces the O2 for the process. As a benchmark, the economics and flexible operation of both processes are compared to a conventional BTL process. In addition, the techno-economic impact of operating in biomass-only or natural gas-only modes are investigated. For a 134 MWth plant with 50 % of entering carbon from biomass, the levelized cost of methanol (LCOMeOH) of ATR+SOEC case is 34 % higher than the BTL reference case, while that of ATR+GHR case is 24 % lower than the BTL reference case. A lifecycle analysis (LCA) is conducted for these designs. Utilizing renewable electricity and 50 % biogenic carbon, the ATR+SOEC case emits 908 kgCO2e /tonne MeOH for a 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP), while the ATR+GHR case emits 721 kgCO2e /tonne MeOH. For a 20-year GWP, these emissions are 1055 and 915 kgCO2e /tonne MeOH, respectively. These emissions correspond to more than 50 % reduction in LCA emissions when compared to natural gas based LCA emissions.

通过生物质气化和天然气转化灵活协同生产甲醇
可持续的液体燃料对于各种交通工具的去碳化至关重要,而通过电气化或使用氢气来解决这些问题具有挑战性。生产低碳液体燃料的一种可行方法是热化学生物质转化为液体(BTL)工艺。在本研究中,我们对两种工艺进行了技术经济环境分析,这两种工艺利用了天然气重整和生物质气化一体化的优势,目的是提高经济效益。通过将天然气转化产生的富含 H2 的合成气(H2/CO 混合气)与生物质气化产生的富含碳的合成气结合起来,我们利用了协同效应。这种组合使我们能够获得合成甲醇所需的最佳 H2/CO 比率,同时还能确保碳的高效利用。在第一种设计中,天然气在自热转化炉(ATR)中转化产生合成气。利用固体氧化物电解池(SOEC)为气化和转化过程提供氧气。SOEC 产生的 H2 可调节甲醇合成反应器前合成气中的 H2 含量。在第二种设计中,天然气在气加热转化炉 (GHR) 中进行转化,然后再进入甲醇合成反应器,同时由空气分离装置 (ASU) 为该工艺提供氧气。作为基准,将这两种工艺的经济性和灵活操作与传统的 BTL 工艺进行了比较。此外,还研究了在纯生物质或纯天然气模式下运行的技术经济影响。对于生物质输入碳占 50% 的 134 MWth 工厂,ATR+SOEC 案例的甲醇平准化成本(LCOMeOH)比 BTL 参考案例高 34%,而 ATR+GHR 案例的甲醇平准化成本比 BTL 参考案例低 24%。对这些设计进行了生命周期分析(LCA)。利用可再生电力和 50% 的生物碳,在 100 年全球升温潜能值 (GWP) 下,ATR+SOEC 案例排放 908 kgCO2e /tonne MeOH,而 ATR+GHR 案例排放 721 kgCO2e /tonne MeOH。对于 20 年全球升温潜能值,这些排放量分别为 1055 和 915 千克 CO2e / 吨甲基OH。与基于天然气的生命周期评估排放量相比,这些排放量相当于减少了 50% 以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信