Cell throughput and performance ratio as quality indicators on hematopoietic stem cell apheresis: A single-center experience

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
{"title":"Cell throughput and performance ratio as quality indicators on hematopoietic stem cell apheresis: A single-center experience","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2024.104003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Benchmarking in CD34<sup>+</sup> cell apheresis is crucial for optimizing resources, ensuring consistent collection performance, and ultimately, decision-making algorithms to improve donor safety. Key performance indicators such as the “performance ratio” (PR) are applied routinely in some apheresis centers, whereas this report identifies the “cell throughput” (CT) as another quality indicator in apheresis.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This single-center study includes retrospective data from 117 aphereses. CT and PR were calculated based on the mononuclear cell collection (MNC) or continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocols of the Spectra Optia® apheresis system, types of venous access, transplant settings, and</p><p>mobilization regimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CTs (× 10<sup>6</sup> CD34<sup>+</sup> cells/min) were found to be greater in cMNC compared to MNC protocols (1.4 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0037), in allogeneic versus autologous (1.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.0274), and in the mobilization regimen of G-CSF alone versus the G-CSF combined (1.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0249). In contrast, PR (%) was only statistically significant in favor of the cMNC protocol (213.0 vs. 186.8 for MNC).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CT and PR are feasible quality indicators on CD34<sup>+</sup> cell apheresis, are easy to calculate and implement, and have clinical and administrative implications. Analyzing CT and PR may strengthen the institutional criteria for selecting cMNC or MNC protocols; they may also be used to evaluate the performance of new personnel or cell separator devices or, eventually, trigger investigations for those aphereses under-collected by specific thresholds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050224001745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Benchmarking in CD34+ cell apheresis is crucial for optimizing resources, ensuring consistent collection performance, and ultimately, decision-making algorithms to improve donor safety. Key performance indicators such as the “performance ratio” (PR) are applied routinely in some apheresis centers, whereas this report identifies the “cell throughput” (CT) as another quality indicator in apheresis.

Material and methods

This single-center study includes retrospective data from 117 aphereses. CT and PR were calculated based on the mononuclear cell collection (MNC) or continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocols of the Spectra Optia® apheresis system, types of venous access, transplant settings, and

mobilization regimens.

Results

CTs (× 106 CD34+ cells/min) were found to be greater in cMNC compared to MNC protocols (1.4 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0037), in allogeneic versus autologous (1.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.0274), and in the mobilization regimen of G-CSF alone versus the G-CSF combined (1.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0249). In contrast, PR (%) was only statistically significant in favor of the cMNC protocol (213.0 vs. 186.8 for MNC).

Conclusions

CT and PR are feasible quality indicators on CD34+ cell apheresis, are easy to calculate and implement, and have clinical and administrative implications. Analyzing CT and PR may strengthen the institutional criteria for selecting cMNC or MNC protocols; they may also be used to evaluate the performance of new personnel or cell separator devices or, eventually, trigger investigations for those aphereses under-collected by specific thresholds.

作为造血干细胞分离质量指标的细胞吞吐量和性能比:单中心经验
背景CD34+细胞采血中的基准指标对优化资源、确保一致的采集性能以及最终改善供者安全的决策算法至关重要。一些血液净化中心常规采用 "性能比"(PR)等关键性能指标,而本报告将 "细胞吞吐量"(CT)确定为血液净化的另一个质量指标。CT 和 PR 的计算基于 Spectra Optia® 无细胞采集系统的单核细胞采集 (MNC) 或连续单核细胞采集 (cMNC) 方案、静脉通路类型、移植设置和动员方案。结果 cMNC 与 MNC 方案相比(1.4 vs. 1.0,p = 0.0037),异体与自体相比(1.3 vs. 1.1,p = 0.0274),单用 G-CSF 与 G-CSF 联合动员方案相比(1.3 vs. 1.0,p = 0.0249),CTs(×106 CD34+ 细胞/分钟)更高。结论CT和PR是CD34+细胞分离的可行质量指标,易于计算和实施,具有临床和管理意义。分析CT和PR可加强选择cMNC或MNC方案的机构标准;它们还可用于评估新人员或细胞分离器设备的性能,或最终触发对未按特定阈值收集到的血球进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues. Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信