A quantitative study of the effects of a dual layer coating drug-eluting stent on safety and efficacy

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
{"title":"A quantitative study of the effects of a dual layer coating drug-eluting stent on safety and efficacy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A key strategy for increasing drug mass (DM) while maintaining good safety is to improve the drug release profile (RP). We designed a dual layer coating drug-eluting stent (DES) that exhibited smaller concentration gradients between the coating and the artery wall and significantly impacted the drug RP. However, a detailed understanding of the effects of the DES designed by our team on safety and efficacy is still lacking. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive multiscale computational framework that would allow us to probe the safety and efficacy of the DES we designed. This framework consisted of four coupled modules, namely (1) a mechanical stimuli module, simulating mechanical stimuli caused by percutaneous coronary intervention through a finite element analysis, (2) an inflammation module, simulating inflammation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) induced by mechanical stimuli through an agent-based model (ABM), (3) a drug transport module, simulating drug transport through a continuum-based approach, and (4) a mitosis module, simulating VSMC mitosis through an ABM. Our results indicated that when the DM increased to two times the initial DM value, the DES we designed had higher safety and lower efficacy values than a conventional DES. When the DM increased to five times the initial DM value, the DES we designed had higher safety than a conventional DES, and negligible differences in efficacy compared with a conventional DES. In summary, the DES we designed exhibited a significant advantage in safety, but a slightly reduced efficacy compared with that of a conventional DES.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024003828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key strategy for increasing drug mass (DM) while maintaining good safety is to improve the drug release profile (RP). We designed a dual layer coating drug-eluting stent (DES) that exhibited smaller concentration gradients between the coating and the artery wall and significantly impacted the drug RP. However, a detailed understanding of the effects of the DES designed by our team on safety and efficacy is still lacking. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive multiscale computational framework that would allow us to probe the safety and efficacy of the DES we designed. This framework consisted of four coupled modules, namely (1) a mechanical stimuli module, simulating mechanical stimuli caused by percutaneous coronary intervention through a finite element analysis, (2) an inflammation module, simulating inflammation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) induced by mechanical stimuli through an agent-based model (ABM), (3) a drug transport module, simulating drug transport through a continuum-based approach, and (4) a mitosis module, simulating VSMC mitosis through an ABM. Our results indicated that when the DM increased to two times the initial DM value, the DES we designed had higher safety and lower efficacy values than a conventional DES. When the DM increased to five times the initial DM value, the DES we designed had higher safety than a conventional DES, and negligible differences in efficacy compared with a conventional DES. In summary, the DES we designed exhibited a significant advantage in safety, but a slightly reduced efficacy compared with that of a conventional DES.

双层涂层药物洗脱支架对安全性和疗效影响的定量研究
在提高药物质量(DM)的同时保持良好安全性的一个关键策略是改善药物释放曲线(RP)。我们设计了一种双层涂层药物洗脱支架(DES),涂层与动脉壁之间的浓度梯度较小,对药物释放曲线有显著影响。然而,我们团队设计的药物洗脱支架对安全性和有效性的影响还缺乏详细的了解。本研究的目的是提供一个全面的多尺度计算框架,使我们能够探究我们设计的 DES 的安全性和有效性。该框架由四个耦合模块组成,即(1)机械刺激模块,通过有限元分析模拟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗引起的机械刺激;(2)炎症模块,通过基于代理的模型(ABM)模拟机械刺激引起的血管平滑肌细胞(VSMC)炎症;(3)药物运输模块,通过基于连续体的方法模拟药物运输;(4)有丝分裂模块,通过ABM模拟VSMC有丝分裂。我们的研究结果表明,当DM增加到初始DM值的2倍时,我们设计的DES与传统DES相比,安全性更高,有效性更低。当DM增加到初始DM值的五倍时,我们设计的DES比传统DES具有更高的安全性,而与传统DES相比,其疗效差异可以忽略不计。总之,与传统的DES相比,我们设计的DES在安全性方面具有显著优势,但疗效略有下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信