Tumor budding is associated with poor prognosis and clinicopathologic factors in esophageal carcinoma: A meta-analysis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108668
{"title":"Tumor budding is associated with poor prognosis and clinicopathologic factors in esophageal carcinoma: A meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Tumor budding is associated with the prognosis of several solid cancers, but further evidence is needed to identify its relation with esophageal cancer. Our study aims to assess the relationship between tumor budding and overall survival, disease-free survival, and clinicopathologic variables in EC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Multiple electronic databases were searched and 20 relevant studies containing 3370 patients were identified<strong>.</strong> The fixed effects and a random-effects model were used to perform a meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Tumor budding was associated with poor overall survival in EC in both univariate analyses (HR:2.63; 95 % CI 2.06–3.38; p &lt; 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR: 2.00; 95 % CI 1.68 to 2.39; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Tumor budding was also associated with poor overall survival in subtypes of EC in subgroup analyses i.e. ESCC (HR:3.26; 95 % CI 2.48 to 4.29; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and EAC (HR:2.00; 95 % CI 1.36 to 2.95; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) in univariate analysis and ESCC (HR: 2.95; 95 % CI 2.18 to 3.99; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and EAC (HR: 1.65; 95 % CI 1.33 to 2.04; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) in multivariate analyses. In addition, tumor budding was also associated with poor DFS (HR: 3.39; 95 % CI 2.1 to 5.48; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, tumor budding was associated with poor clinicopathologic factors like advanced T-stage, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings of our study suggest that tumor budding is a promising independent prognostic factor and is correlated with poor clinicopathologic variables of esophageal carcinoma. The inclusion of tumor budding in future grading systems may help in improving currently available staging systems of esophageal carcinoma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798324007200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Tumor budding is associated with the prognosis of several solid cancers, but further evidence is needed to identify its relation with esophageal cancer. Our study aims to assess the relationship between tumor budding and overall survival, disease-free survival, and clinicopathologic variables in EC.

Methods

Multiple electronic databases were searched and 20 relevant studies containing 3370 patients were identified. The fixed effects and a random-effects model were used to perform a meta-analysis.

Result

Tumor budding was associated with poor overall survival in EC in both univariate analyses (HR:2.63; 95 % CI 2.06–3.38; p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR: 2.00; 95 % CI 1.68 to 2.39; P < 0.001). Tumor budding was also associated with poor overall survival in subtypes of EC in subgroup analyses i.e. ESCC (HR:3.26; 95 % CI 2.48 to 4.29; P < 0.001), and EAC (HR:2.00; 95 % CI 1.36 to 2.95; P < 0.001) in univariate analysis and ESCC (HR: 2.95; 95 % CI 2.18 to 3.99; P < 0.001) and EAC (HR: 1.65; 95 % CI 1.33 to 2.04; P < 0.001) in multivariate analyses. In addition, tumor budding was also associated with poor DFS (HR: 3.39; 95 % CI 2.1 to 5.48; P < 0.001). Furthermore, tumor budding was associated with poor clinicopathologic factors like advanced T-stage, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion.

Conclusion

The findings of our study suggest that tumor budding is a promising independent prognostic factor and is correlated with poor clinicopathologic variables of esophageal carcinoma. The inclusion of tumor budding in future grading systems may help in improving currently available staging systems of esophageal carcinoma.

肿瘤出芽与食管癌的不良预后和临床病理因素有关:一项荟萃分析
背景和目的肿瘤萌芽与多种实体瘤的预后有关,但需要进一步的证据来确定其与食管癌的关系。我们的研究旨在评估食管癌中肿瘤出芽与总生存期、无病生存期和临床病理变量之间的关系。方法检索了多个电子数据库,并确定了包含 3370 名患者的 20 项相关研究。结果在单变量分析(HR:2.63;95 % CI 2.06-3.38;P <;0.001)和多变量分析(HR:2.00;95 % CI 1.68-2.39;P <;0.001)中,肿瘤萌芽与EC总生存率低有关。在亚组分析中,肿瘤出芽也与EC亚型(即ESCC(HR:3.26;95 % CI 2.48至4.29;P <;0.001)和EAC(HR:2.00;95 % CI 1.36 to 2.95; P <0.001),多变量分析中ESCC(HR: 2.95; 95 % CI 2.18 to 3.99; P <0.001)和EAC(HR: 1.65; 95 % CI 1.33 to 2.04; P <0.001)。此外,肿瘤出芽还与不良的 DFS 相关(HR:3.39;95 % CI 2.1 至 5.48;P <;0.001)。此外,肿瘤出芽还与晚期T期、淋巴结转移、淋巴浸润和静脉浸润等不良临床病理因素相关。 结论:我们的研究结果表明,肿瘤出芽是一个有希望的独立预后因素,与食管癌的不良临床病理变量相关。将肿瘤出芽纳入未来的分级系统可能有助于改善现有的食管癌分期系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信