Extended reality used in the treatment of phantom limb pain: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Eva Lendaro,Corry K Van der Sluis,Liselotte Hermansson,Lina Bunketorp-Käll,Helena Burger,Els Keesom,Cathrine Widehammar,Maria Munoz-Novoa,Brian E McGuire,Paul O ' Reilly,Eric J Earley,Sonam Iqbal,Morten B Kristoffersen,Anita Stockselius,Lena Gudmundson,Wendy Hill,Martin Diers,Kristi L Turner,Thomas Weiss,Max Ortiz-Catalan
{"title":"Extended reality used in the treatment of phantom limb pain: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Eva Lendaro,Corry K Van der Sluis,Liselotte Hermansson,Lina Bunketorp-Käll,Helena Burger,Els Keesom,Cathrine Widehammar,Maria Munoz-Novoa,Brian E McGuire,Paul O ' Reilly,Eric J Earley,Sonam Iqbal,Morten B Kristoffersen,Anita Stockselius,Lena Gudmundson,Wendy Hill,Martin Diers,Kristi L Turner,Thomas Weiss,Max Ortiz-Catalan","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phantom limb pain (PLP) represents a significant challenge after amputation. This study investigated the use of phantom motor execution (PME) and phantom motor imagery (PMI) facilitated by extended reality (XR) for the treatment of PLP. Both treatments used XR, but PME involved overt execution of phantom movements, relying on the decoding of motor intent using machine learning to enable real-time control in XR. In contrast, PMI involved mental rehearsal of phantom movements guided by XR. The study hypothesized that PME would be superior to PMI. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 9 outpatient clinics across 7 countries. Eighty-one participants with PLP were randomly assigned to PME or PMI training. The primary outcome was the change in PLP, measured by the Pain Rating Index, from baseline to treatment cessation. Secondary outcomes included various aspects related to PLP, such as the rate of clinically meaningful reduction in pain (CMRP; >50% pain decrease). No evidence was found for superiority of overt execution (PME) over imagery (PMI) using XR. PLP decreased by 64.5% and 68.2% in PME and PMI groups, respectively. Thirty-seven PME participants (71%) and 19 PMI participants (68%) experienced CMRP. Positive changes were recorded in all other outcomes, without group differences. Pain reduction for PME was larger than previously reported. Despite our initial hypothesis not being confirmed, PME and PMI, aided by XR, are likely to offer meaningful PLP relief to most patients. These findings merit consideration of these therapies as viable treatment options and alternatives to pharmacological treatments.","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phantom limb pain (PLP) represents a significant challenge after amputation. This study investigated the use of phantom motor execution (PME) and phantom motor imagery (PMI) facilitated by extended reality (XR) for the treatment of PLP. Both treatments used XR, but PME involved overt execution of phantom movements, relying on the decoding of motor intent using machine learning to enable real-time control in XR. In contrast, PMI involved mental rehearsal of phantom movements guided by XR. The study hypothesized that PME would be superior to PMI. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 9 outpatient clinics across 7 countries. Eighty-one participants with PLP were randomly assigned to PME or PMI training. The primary outcome was the change in PLP, measured by the Pain Rating Index, from baseline to treatment cessation. Secondary outcomes included various aspects related to PLP, such as the rate of clinically meaningful reduction in pain (CMRP; >50% pain decrease). No evidence was found for superiority of overt execution (PME) over imagery (PMI) using XR. PLP decreased by 64.5% and 68.2% in PME and PMI groups, respectively. Thirty-seven PME participants (71%) and 19 PMI participants (68%) experienced CMRP. Positive changes were recorded in all other outcomes, without group differences. Pain reduction for PME was larger than previously reported. Despite our initial hypothesis not being confirmed, PME and PMI, aided by XR, are likely to offer meaningful PLP relief to most patients. These findings merit consideration of these therapies as viable treatment options and alternatives to pharmacological treatments.
用于治疗幻肢痛的扩展现实疗法:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
幻肢痛(PLP)是截肢后的一项重大挑战。本研究调查了在扩展现实(XR)的帮助下使用幻肢运动执行(PME)和幻肢运动想象(PMI)治疗幻肢痛的情况。两种治疗方法都使用了 XR,但幻象运动执行涉及幻象运动的公开执行,依赖于使用机器学习对运动意图进行解码,从而在 XR 中实现实时控制。相比之下,PMI 涉及在 XR 引导下对幻影动作进行心理演练。研究假设 PME 将优于 PMI。在 7 个国家的 9 个门诊诊所进行了一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。81名PLP患者被随机分配到PME或PMI培训中。主要结果是以疼痛评分指数衡量的 PLP 从基线到治疗停止期间的变化。次要结果包括与PLP相关的各个方面,如疼痛有临床意义的减轻率(CMRP;疼痛减轻>50%)。没有证据表明使用 XR 的公开执行(PME)优于想象(PMI)。PME组和PMI组的PLP分别下降了64.5%和68.2%。37 名 PME 参与者(71%)和 19 名 PMI 参与者(68%)经历了 CMRP。所有其他结果都出现了积极变化,没有组间差异。PME患者的疼痛减轻程度大于之前的报道。尽管我们最初的假设没有得到证实,但在XR的辅助下,PME和PMI很可能为大多数患者提供有意义的PLP缓解。这些研究结果值得考虑将这些疗法作为可行的治疗方案和药物治疗的替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信