Systems Perspective Outcomes from Aerospace Failure Investigations

Elizabeth Matranga, Calvin Fong, Dr. Dianne DeTurris, Dr. Shannon Flumerfelt
{"title":"Systems Perspective Outcomes from Aerospace Failure Investigations","authors":"Elizabeth Matranga,&nbsp;Calvin Fong,&nbsp;Dr. Dianne DeTurris,&nbsp;Dr. Shannon Flumerfelt","doi":"10.1002/iis2.13273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many tools are available for managing complexity in the development of large aerospace systems. Complexity manifests in components, software and so many possible human interactions that all the operational states of the system are not predicted ahead of time. System behaviors are seemingly unexpected, unpredictable, and often unwanted. However, finding these failure modes before they happen can be done by techniques that are qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods, used situationally, as needed for each particular circumstance. Through studies of failure investigations from NASA and the aerospace industry, recommendations coalesce on using a systems perspective to increase communication and reduce the risk of failure. Overall, a consistent outcome of these investigations is the suggestion to listen to as many value-added perspectives as possible. Preventing failures in operation is managed by improving collaboration within and among teams, which is an effective way to reveal those perspectives, through both formal and informal communication techniques properly contextualized.</p>","PeriodicalId":100663,"journal":{"name":"INCOSE International Symposium","volume":"34 1","pages":"2332-2350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INCOSE International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iis2.13273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many tools are available for managing complexity in the development of large aerospace systems. Complexity manifests in components, software and so many possible human interactions that all the operational states of the system are not predicted ahead of time. System behaviors are seemingly unexpected, unpredictable, and often unwanted. However, finding these failure modes before they happen can be done by techniques that are qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods, used situationally, as needed for each particular circumstance. Through studies of failure investigations from NASA and the aerospace industry, recommendations coalesce on using a systems perspective to increase communication and reduce the risk of failure. Overall, a consistent outcome of these investigations is the suggestion to listen to as many value-added perspectives as possible. Preventing failures in operation is managed by improving collaboration within and among teams, which is an effective way to reveal those perspectives, through both formal and informal communication techniques properly contextualized.

从系统角度看航空航天故障调查的结果
在大型航空航天系统的开发过程中,有许多工具可用于管理复杂性。复杂性体现在组件、软件和许多可能的人际互动中,以至于无法提前预测系统的所有运行状态。系统行为看似出乎意料、不可预测,而且往往是不希望发生的。然而,可以通过定性、定量或混合方法的技术,在故障发生前找到这些故障模式,并根据具体情况的需要加以使用。通过对美国国家航空航天局(NASA)和航空航天工业的故障调查研究,我们提出了一些建议,即从系统的角度来加强沟通和降低故障风险。总之,这些调查的一致结果是建议尽可能多地听取增值观点。通过改进团队内部和团队之间的协作来防止运行中的故障,这是通过正式和非正式的沟通技巧适当地结合实际情况来揭示这些观点的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信