Theoretical Underpinnings to Establish Fidelity Conditions for Defining Verification Models

Paul Wach, Alejandro Salado
{"title":"Theoretical Underpinnings to Establish Fidelity Conditions for Defining Verification Models","authors":"Paul Wach,&nbsp;Alejandro Salado","doi":"10.1002/iis2.13136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current state of the discipline suggests that the desired fidelity of verification models is defined based on qualitative statements, that is, using heuristics, at the onset of an engineering endeavor. While the use of heuristics in systems engineering is well known, many heuristics have not been validated, and therefore there may be errors in judgement that could lead to systems being engineered that are ultimately not fit-for-purpose. This bears the question, based on what conditions should we formally define verification models? In this article, we provide insights from our research to discover the sufficient conditions for defining verification models, taking a science-based approach that leverages the richness of systems-theoretic constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":100663,"journal":{"name":"INCOSE International Symposium","volume":"34 1","pages":"122-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INCOSE International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iis2.13136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current state of the discipline suggests that the desired fidelity of verification models is defined based on qualitative statements, that is, using heuristics, at the onset of an engineering endeavor. While the use of heuristics in systems engineering is well known, many heuristics have not been validated, and therefore there may be errors in judgement that could lead to systems being engineered that are ultimately not fit-for-purpose. This bears the question, based on what conditions should we formally define verification models? In this article, we provide insights from our research to discover the sufficient conditions for defining verification models, taking a science-based approach that leverages the richness of systems-theoretic constructs.

为定义验证模型建立保真条件的理论基础
该学科的现状表明,验证模型所需的保真度是根据定性陈述来定义的,即在工程开始时使用启发式方法。虽然启发式方法在系统工程中的使用已广为人知,但许多启发式方法尚未经过验证,因此可能会出现判断错误,从而导致所设计的系统最终无法达到目的。这就提出了一个问题:我们应该根据什么条件来正式定义验证模型?在本文中,我们将通过基于科学的方法,利用丰富的系统理论构造,提供我们的研究见解,以发现定义验证模型的充分条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信