Early Validation of SysML Architectures by Extending MBSE with Co-Simulation using FMI and SSP

Johan Cederbladh, Daniel Krems
{"title":"Early Validation of SysML Architectures by Extending MBSE with Co-Simulation using FMI and SSP","authors":"Johan Cederbladh,&nbsp;Daniel Krems","doi":"10.1002/iis2.13135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to complexity increases in modern systems and the digitalization paradigm shift, industrial development requires the integration of new technologies and methods to keep product quality high while reducing time to market. One emerging paradigm in the Systems Engineering (SE) discipline is ModelBased methods and technologies, and correspondingly Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) is seeing increased adoption. With mature MBSE application, several benefits can be expected from the availability of models, even from the very early stages of development, enabling increased communication clarity, cross-domain collaboration, traceability, and analysis. Notably, MBSE enables (Co-)simulation even at the early stage of architecture/design by leveraging model-based capabilities. Co-simulation specifically enables a smooth and seamless integration of different models defined across layers of abstraction, for example, system logical architecture and system physical architecture. However, while MBSE is assisting with many aspects of development it is still a predominantly isolated set of activities throughout the development, especially on the left-hand side of the traditional V-model. In this work we discuss the status of Co-simulation in industrial MBSE and list several existing challenges, then we propose a novel framework for implementing Co-simulation and exemplify using a real scenario how we might address the observed challenges. The framework hinges on the newly proposed SSP standard and extends the currently industrially adopted FMI (version 3) standard through embedding the FMI file format using various scripts, demonstrated in the Python language for this paper. Finally, we propose a set of recommendations for future investigations to strengthen Co-simulation in industrial MBSE.</p>","PeriodicalId":100663,"journal":{"name":"INCOSE International Symposium","volume":"34 1","pages":"106-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INCOSE International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iis2.13135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to complexity increases in modern systems and the digitalization paradigm shift, industrial development requires the integration of new technologies and methods to keep product quality high while reducing time to market. One emerging paradigm in the Systems Engineering (SE) discipline is ModelBased methods and technologies, and correspondingly Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) is seeing increased adoption. With mature MBSE application, several benefits can be expected from the availability of models, even from the very early stages of development, enabling increased communication clarity, cross-domain collaboration, traceability, and analysis. Notably, MBSE enables (Co-)simulation even at the early stage of architecture/design by leveraging model-based capabilities. Co-simulation specifically enables a smooth and seamless integration of different models defined across layers of abstraction, for example, system logical architecture and system physical architecture. However, while MBSE is assisting with many aspects of development it is still a predominantly isolated set of activities throughout the development, especially on the left-hand side of the traditional V-model. In this work we discuss the status of Co-simulation in industrial MBSE and list several existing challenges, then we propose a novel framework for implementing Co-simulation and exemplify using a real scenario how we might address the observed challenges. The framework hinges on the newly proposed SSP standard and extends the currently industrially adopted FMI (version 3) standard through embedding the FMI file format using various scripts, demonstrated in the Python language for this paper. Finally, we propose a set of recommendations for future investigations to strengthen Co-simulation in industrial MBSE.

利用 FMI 和 SSP 通过协同仿真扩展 MBSE,对 SysML 架构进行早期验证
由于现代系统复杂性的增加和数字化模式的转变,工业发展需要整合新的技术和方法,以保证产品质量,同时缩短产品上市时间。系统工程(SE)学科的一个新兴范式就是基于模型的方法和技术,相应地,基于模型的系统工程(MBSE)也得到了越来越多的采用。在成熟的 MBSE 应用中,即使在开发的早期阶段,模型的可用性也会带来一些好处,从而提高沟通的清晰度、跨领域协作、可追溯性和分析能力。值得注意的是,通过利用基于模型的功能,MBSE 甚至可以在架构/设计的早期阶段进行(协同)仿真。协同仿真专门实现了跨抽象层(如系统逻辑架构和系统物理架构)定义的不同模型的平滑无缝集成。然而,虽然 MBSE 对开发的许多方面都有帮助,但在整个开发过程中,尤其是在传统 V 模型的左侧,它仍然是一套孤立的活动。在这项工作中,我们讨论了工业 MBSE 中协同仿真的现状,并列出了几个现有的挑战,然后我们提出了一个实施协同仿真的新框架,并用一个实际场景来举例说明我们如何应对所观察到的挑战。该框架以新提出的 SSP 标准为基础,通过使用各种脚本嵌入 FMI 文件格式,扩展了目前工业上采用的 FMI(第 3 版)标准。最后,我们为未来的研究提出了一系列建议,以加强工业 MBSE 中的协同仿真。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信