International perspective of injection laryngoplasty for laryngeal cleft – A survey study

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112097

Marit J.B. van Stigt , Saskia Coenraad , Inge Stegeman , Robert J. Stokroos , Stefaan H.A.J. Tytgat , Maud Y.A. Lindeboom , Arnold J.N. Bittermann

{"title":"International perspective of injection laryngoplasty for laryngeal cleft – A survey study","authors":"Marit J.B. van Stigt , Saskia Coenraad , Inge Stegeman , Robert J. Stokroos , Stefaan H.A.J. Tytgat , Maud Y.A. Lindeboom , Arnold J.N. Bittermann","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Laryngeal Cleft (LC) is an anatomical defect that can cause swallowing difficulties and subsequent recurrent respiratory symptoms. LC can be treated surgically by performing suture repair or by Injection Laryngoplasty (IL). The indications and efficacy of IL are debated among pediatric otolaryngologists. The aim of this survey study was to review the international perspective on IL for LC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online survey was conducted to assess international opinions on the indications and efficacy of IL for LC patients. An online survey was sent to 250 pediatric otolaryngologists worldwide. The survey included questions on the management of LC, the physicians’ experience with IL, and their use of IL.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty two (25 %) pediatric otolaryngologists, from 47 medical centers, completed the survey. Of the respondents, 38 (62 %) perform IL. The most reported indication was as a diagnostic tool. For the respondents who did not perform IL, the reasons most reported were that the effect is temporary and that there is a need for a second surgery after IL.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to this survey, the perspectives on the use of IL for LC differ among pediatric otolaryngologists, and there is variation in peri-and postoperative standard of care. The respondents' opinions on IL were partly dependent on the intended outcome of its use, i.e., as a permanent treatment or for other indications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587624002519","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Laryngeal Cleft (LC) is an anatomical defect that can cause swallowing difficulties and subsequent recurrent respiratory symptoms. LC can be treated surgically by performing suture repair or by Injection Laryngoplasty (IL). The indications and efficacy of IL are debated among pediatric otolaryngologists. The aim of this survey study was to review the international perspective on IL for LC.

Methods

An online survey was conducted to assess international opinions on the indications and efficacy of IL for LC patients. An online survey was sent to 250 pediatric otolaryngologists worldwide. The survey included questions on the management of LC, the physicians’ experience with IL, and their use of IL.

Results

Sixty two (25 %) pediatric otolaryngologists, from 47 medical centers, completed the survey. Of the respondents, 38 (62 %) perform IL. The most reported indication was as a diagnostic tool. For the respondents who did not perform IL, the reasons most reported were that the effect is temporary and that there is a need for a second surgery after IL.

Conclusion

According to this survey, the perspectives on the use of IL for LC differ among pediatric otolaryngologists, and there is variation in peri-and postoperative standard of care. The respondents' opinions on IL were partly dependent on the intended outcome of its use, i.e., as a permanent treatment or for other indications.

查看原文本刊更多论文

喉裂注射成形术的国际视角 - 一项调查研究

目的喉裂（LC）是一种解剖缺陷，可导致吞咽困难和随后的反复呼吸道症状。喉裂可通过缝合修复或注射喉成形术（IL）进行手术治疗。儿科耳鼻喉科医生对注射隆鼻术的适应症和疗效存在争议。本调查研究的目的是回顾国际上对IL治疗LC的看法。方法进行在线调查，评估国际上对IL治疗LC患者的适应症和疗效的看法。我们向全球 250 名儿科耳鼻喉科医生发送了在线调查问卷。结果来自 47 个医疗中心的 62 名（25%）儿科耳鼻喉科医生完成了调查。受访者中有 38 人（62%）使用 IL。报告最多的适应症是作为诊断工具。结论根据这项调查，小儿耳鼻喉科医生对在 LC 中使用 IL 的看法不尽相同，术前术后的护理标准也存在差异。受访者对IL的看法在一定程度上取决于其使用的预期结果，即作为永久性治疗还是用于其他适应症。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.