Applying Experienced-Based Co-Design principles to improve digital health demand management processes in a large metropolitan multi-hospital health system
Alofi S Black , Sundresan Naicker , Amina Tariq , Phuong Le , Raelene Donovan , Matthew Jones , Stephen Canaris , Richard Warne , Cameron Ballantine , Steven M McPhail
{"title":"Applying Experienced-Based Co-Design principles to improve digital health demand management processes in a large metropolitan multi-hospital health system","authors":"Alofi S Black , Sundresan Naicker , Amina Tariq , Phuong Le , Raelene Donovan , Matthew Jones , Stephen Canaris , Richard Warne , Cameron Ballantine , Steven M McPhail","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study describes the application of Experienced-Based Co-Design (EBCD) principles with an embedded implementation technology framework for improving digital health and informatics demand management processes in a multi-hospital healthcare system. The study identified barriers and enablers within the existing demand management system, proposed interventions to address these challenges and engaged in collaborative co-design with stakeholders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multi-method qualitative approach aligning with EBCD principles was used. Framework mapping (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability) was applied to barriers and enablers associated with baseline practices. Reflexive thematic mapping and process charts were used to inform stakeholder priorities and co-design. Prototyping was iterative using feedback for continuous improvement with ongoing monitoring.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fragmentation of information was a technological barrier, decentralized processes and service duplication were organizational barriers, and opportunities to improve clarity of governance policies were identified. Solutions were co-generated and prioritised by stakeholders. The co-design and prototyping phase followed an iterative approach which generated two interventions. For centralizing intake and management, a new workflow process was devised. For improving project portfolio visibility and developing a weighted scoring criterion, a single tool to track projects across the lifecycle and a scoring model based on prioritization techniques were created.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A novel application of an EBCD approach was used to improve demand management processes in a digital health and informatics service context in a large health system. It highlights the value and agility of EBCD to generate flexible and modular solutions for this digital health context and compares favorably to analogous approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><p>In today's fast-paced digital age, it is vital for hospitals to manage health information innovation efficiently. This study used an Experienced-Based Co-Design design (EBCD) approach to improve how a multi-hospital health system handles and prioritizes digital health projects. We listened to stakeholders, identified challenges, including fragmented information and unclear processes, then co-created solutions. The EBCD produced an implementable streamlined method for managing digital health project requests, including prioritizing and tracking projects from start to finish. This outcome of the exemplar EBCD process is likely to ensure that the most critical health projects are prioritized. For the public, this means better, faster, and more efficient digital health services in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study describes the application of Experienced-Based Co-Design (EBCD) principles with an embedded implementation technology framework for improving digital health and informatics demand management processes in a multi-hospital healthcare system. The study identified barriers and enablers within the existing demand management system, proposed interventions to address these challenges and engaged in collaborative co-design with stakeholders.
Methods
A multi-method qualitative approach aligning with EBCD principles was used. Framework mapping (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability) was applied to barriers and enablers associated with baseline practices. Reflexive thematic mapping and process charts were used to inform stakeholder priorities and co-design. Prototyping was iterative using feedback for continuous improvement with ongoing monitoring.
Results
Fragmentation of information was a technological barrier, decentralized processes and service duplication were organizational barriers, and opportunities to improve clarity of governance policies were identified. Solutions were co-generated and prioritised by stakeholders. The co-design and prototyping phase followed an iterative approach which generated two interventions. For centralizing intake and management, a new workflow process was devised. For improving project portfolio visibility and developing a weighted scoring criterion, a single tool to track projects across the lifecycle and a scoring model based on prioritization techniques were created.
Conclusion
A novel application of an EBCD approach was used to improve demand management processes in a digital health and informatics service context in a large health system. It highlights the value and agility of EBCD to generate flexible and modular solutions for this digital health context and compares favorably to analogous approaches.
Public interest summary
In today's fast-paced digital age, it is vital for hospitals to manage health information innovation efficiently. This study used an Experienced-Based Co-Design design (EBCD) approach to improve how a multi-hospital health system handles and prioritizes digital health projects. We listened to stakeholders, identified challenges, including fragmented information and unclear processes, then co-created solutions. The EBCD produced an implementable streamlined method for managing digital health project requests, including prioritizing and tracking projects from start to finish. This outcome of the exemplar EBCD process is likely to ensure that the most critical health projects are prioritized. For the public, this means better, faster, and more efficient digital health services in the future.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics