Applying Experienced-Based Co-Design principles to improve digital health demand management processes in a large metropolitan multi-hospital health system

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Alofi S Black , Sundresan Naicker , Amina Tariq , Phuong Le , Raelene Donovan , Matthew Jones , Stephen Canaris , Richard Warne , Cameron Ballantine , Steven M McPhail
{"title":"Applying Experienced-Based Co-Design principles to improve digital health demand management processes in a large metropolitan multi-hospital health system","authors":"Alofi S Black ,&nbsp;Sundresan Naicker ,&nbsp;Amina Tariq ,&nbsp;Phuong Le ,&nbsp;Raelene Donovan ,&nbsp;Matthew Jones ,&nbsp;Stephen Canaris ,&nbsp;Richard Warne ,&nbsp;Cameron Ballantine ,&nbsp;Steven M McPhail","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study describes the application of Experienced-Based Co-Design (EBCD) principles with an embedded implementation technology framework for improving digital health and informatics demand management processes in a multi-hospital healthcare system. The study identified barriers and enablers within the existing demand management system, proposed interventions to address these challenges and engaged in collaborative co-design with stakeholders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multi-method qualitative approach aligning with EBCD principles was used. Framework mapping (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability) was applied to barriers and enablers associated with baseline practices. Reflexive thematic mapping and process charts were used to inform stakeholder priorities and co-design. Prototyping was iterative using feedback for continuous improvement with ongoing monitoring.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fragmentation of information was a technological barrier, decentralized processes and service duplication were organizational barriers, and opportunities to improve clarity of governance policies were identified. Solutions were co-generated and prioritised by stakeholders. The co-design and prototyping phase followed an iterative approach which generated two interventions. For centralizing intake and management, a new workflow process was devised. For improving project portfolio visibility and developing a weighted scoring criterion, a single tool to track projects across the lifecycle and a scoring model based on prioritization techniques were created.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A novel application of an EBCD approach was used to improve demand management processes in a digital health and informatics service context in a large health system. It highlights the value and agility of EBCD to generate flexible and modular solutions for this digital health context and compares favorably to analogous approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><p>In today's fast-paced digital age, it is vital for hospitals to manage health information innovation efficiently. This study used an Experienced-Based Co-Design design (EBCD) approach to improve how a multi-hospital health system handles and prioritizes digital health projects. We listened to stakeholders, identified challenges, including fragmented information and unclear processes, then co-created solutions. The EBCD produced an implementable streamlined method for managing digital health project requests, including prioritizing and tracking projects from start to finish. This outcome of the exemplar EBCD process is likely to ensure that the most critical health projects are prioritized. For the public, this means better, faster, and more efficient digital health services in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 4","pages":"Article 100905"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study describes the application of Experienced-Based Co-Design (EBCD) principles with an embedded implementation technology framework for improving digital health and informatics demand management processes in a multi-hospital healthcare system. The study identified barriers and enablers within the existing demand management system, proposed interventions to address these challenges and engaged in collaborative co-design with stakeholders.

Methods

A multi-method qualitative approach aligning with EBCD principles was used. Framework mapping (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability) was applied to barriers and enablers associated with baseline practices. Reflexive thematic mapping and process charts were used to inform stakeholder priorities and co-design. Prototyping was iterative using feedback for continuous improvement with ongoing monitoring.

Results

Fragmentation of information was a technological barrier, decentralized processes and service duplication were organizational barriers, and opportunities to improve clarity of governance policies were identified. Solutions were co-generated and prioritised by stakeholders. The co-design and prototyping phase followed an iterative approach which generated two interventions. For centralizing intake and management, a new workflow process was devised. For improving project portfolio visibility and developing a weighted scoring criterion, a single tool to track projects across the lifecycle and a scoring model based on prioritization techniques were created.

Conclusion

A novel application of an EBCD approach was used to improve demand management processes in a digital health and informatics service context in a large health system. It highlights the value and agility of EBCD to generate flexible and modular solutions for this digital health context and compares favorably to analogous approaches.

Public interest summary

In today's fast-paced digital age, it is vital for hospitals to manage health information innovation efficiently. This study used an Experienced-Based Co-Design design (EBCD) approach to improve how a multi-hospital health system handles and prioritizes digital health projects. We listened to stakeholders, identified challenges, including fragmented information and unclear processes, then co-created solutions. The EBCD produced an implementable streamlined method for managing digital health project requests, including prioritizing and tracking projects from start to finish. This outcome of the exemplar EBCD process is likely to ensure that the most critical health projects are prioritized. For the public, this means better, faster, and more efficient digital health services in the future.

应用基于经验的协同设计原则,改进大都市多医院医疗系统的数字医疗需求管理流程
本研究介绍了基于经验的协同设计(EBCD)原则与嵌入式实施技术框架在多医院医疗系统中的应用,以改善数字医疗和信息学需求管理流程。该研究确定了现有需求管理系统中的障碍和有利因素,提出了应对这些挑战的干预措施,并与利益相关者进行了合作性共同设计。对与基线实践相关的障碍和促进因素进行了框架映射(不采用、放弃、扩大规模、传播、可持续性)。利用反思性专题制图和流程图为利益相关者的优先事项和共同设计提供信息。结果信息分散是技术障碍,流程分散和服务重复是组织障碍,管理政策的清晰度有待提高。各利益相关方共同提出了解决方案并确定了优先次序。共同设计和原型设计阶段采用迭代方法,产生了两种干预措施。为了集中接收和管理,设计了一个新的工作流程。为了提高项目组合的可视性并制定加权评分标准,创建了一个在整个生命周期内跟踪项目的单一工具和一个基于优先级排序技术的评分模型。 结论 EBCD 方法的一种新颖应用被用于改进大型医疗系统中数字医疗和信息学服务背景下的需求管理流程。它强调了 EBCD 的价值和灵活性,可为数字医疗环境提供灵活的模块化解决方案,与同类方法相比更胜一筹。本研究采用基于经验的协同设计(EBCD)方法来改善一个多医院医疗系统如何处理数字医疗项目并确定其优先次序。我们听取了利益相关者的意见,确定了面临的挑战,包括信息分散和流程不清晰,然后共同制定了解决方案。EBCD 提出了一种可实施的简化方法,用于管理数字医疗项目申请,包括对项目进行优先排序和自始至终的跟踪。EBCD 示范流程的这一成果可能会确保最关键的医疗项目得到优先考虑。对公众而言,这意味着未来将有更好、更快、更高效的数字医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信