A new classification method for gestational diabetes mellitus: a study on the relationship between abnormal blood glucose values at different time points in oral glucose tolerance test and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus

{"title":"A new classification method for gestational diabetes mellitus: a study on the relationship between abnormal blood glucose values at different time points in oral glucose tolerance test and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can lead to various adverse pregnancy outcomes for both mothers and infants, including gestational hypertension, premature rupture of membranes, preterm birth, macrosomia, large for gestational age (LGA) infants, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Previous studies have mainly focused on the overall risk of GDM for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, but there has been limited research specifically investigating the relationship between different patterns of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The study aimed to analyze the maternal and neonatal outcomes among GDM women with different OGTT patterns and to explore a new classification method capable of stratifying GDM into high-risk (GDM-HR) and low-risk subtypes based on OGTT results.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, spanning from November 1, 2015, to April 30, 2018. During the study period, a total of 3268 cases of GDM were enrolled. Based on the results of the OGTT, these GDM cases were classified into 7 subtypes, and the composition ratio of each subtype and their maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Innovatively, we proposed to categorize GDM-HR (characterized by elevated fasting blood glucose [FBG] levels, including T0, T0+1, T0+2, and T0+1+2) and low-risk GDM (GDM-LR, without elevated FBG, including T1, T2, and T1+2) and compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two subtypes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>(1) In this cohort of 3268 GDM cases, the composition ratios of the 7 GDM subtypes were as follows: T0 (7.9%, <em>n</em>=260), T1 (24.2%, <em>n</em>=791), T2 (27.4%, <em>n</em>=897), T0+1 (5.4%, <em>n</em>=175), T0+2 (1.7%, <em>n</em>=56), T1+2 (26.2%, <em>n</em>=855), and T0+1+2 (7.2%, <em>n</em>=234). (2) GDM subtypes with elevated FBG levels (GDM-HR) exhibit more severe adverse prognostic outcomes compared to those without elevated FBG levels (GDM-LR). (3) Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that compared to the GDM-LR group, the GDM-HR group showed increased fetal birth weight (by approximately 150 grams), and had higher rates of cesarean section (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19–1.76), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.35–2.35), preterm birth (aOR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.17–2.16), macrosomia (aOR: 2.66, 95% CI: 2.07–3.43), LGA infants (aOR: 2.46, 95% CI: 2.05–2.97), and neonatal hypoglycemia (aOR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.37–2.91). Partial correlation analysis shows a positive correlation between fetal birth weight and FBG levels, with <em>r</em>=0.222, <em>P</em>&lt;.001. Multiple linear regression indicates that for every 1 mmol/L increase in FBG, the fetal weight is estimated to increase by approximately 188 grams.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The composition ratio of GDM subtypes with elevated FBG (GDM-HR) is relatively low within GDM cases, yet it presents with a higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to subtypes without elevated FBG (GDM-LR), warranting increased attention from obstetricians. Applying this new classification method in clinical practice enables better differentiation and individualized management of GDM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000844/pdfft?md5=1025a5f3dc6b0bf91c2ed312380a72b7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577824000844-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can lead to various adverse pregnancy outcomes for both mothers and infants, including gestational hypertension, premature rupture of membranes, preterm birth, macrosomia, large for gestational age (LGA) infants, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Previous studies have mainly focused on the overall risk of GDM for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, but there has been limited research specifically investigating the relationship between different patterns of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Objective

The study aimed to analyze the maternal and neonatal outcomes among GDM women with different OGTT patterns and to explore a new classification method capable of stratifying GDM into high-risk (GDM-HR) and low-risk subtypes based on OGTT results.

Study Design

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, spanning from November 1, 2015, to April 30, 2018. During the study period, a total of 3268 cases of GDM were enrolled. Based on the results of the OGTT, these GDM cases were classified into 7 subtypes, and the composition ratio of each subtype and their maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Innovatively, we proposed to categorize GDM-HR (characterized by elevated fasting blood glucose [FBG] levels, including T0, T0+1, T0+2, and T0+1+2) and low-risk GDM (GDM-LR, without elevated FBG, including T1, T2, and T1+2) and compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two subtypes.

Results

(1) In this cohort of 3268 GDM cases, the composition ratios of the 7 GDM subtypes were as follows: T0 (7.9%, n=260), T1 (24.2%, n=791), T2 (27.4%, n=897), T0+1 (5.4%, n=175), T0+2 (1.7%, n=56), T1+2 (26.2%, n=855), and T0+1+2 (7.2%, n=234). (2) GDM subtypes with elevated FBG levels (GDM-HR) exhibit more severe adverse prognostic outcomes compared to those without elevated FBG levels (GDM-LR). (3) Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that compared to the GDM-LR group, the GDM-HR group showed increased fetal birth weight (by approximately 150 grams), and had higher rates of cesarean section (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19–1.76), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.35–2.35), preterm birth (aOR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.17–2.16), macrosomia (aOR: 2.66, 95% CI: 2.07–3.43), LGA infants (aOR: 2.46, 95% CI: 2.05–2.97), and neonatal hypoglycemia (aOR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.37–2.91). Partial correlation analysis shows a positive correlation between fetal birth weight and FBG levels, with r=0.222, P<.001. Multiple linear regression indicates that for every 1 mmol/L increase in FBG, the fetal weight is estimated to increase by approximately 188 grams.

Conclusion

The composition ratio of GDM subtypes with elevated FBG (GDM-HR) is relatively low within GDM cases, yet it presents with a higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to subtypes without elevated FBG (GDM-LR), warranting increased attention from obstetricians. Applying this new classification method in clinical practice enables better differentiation and individualized management of GDM.

妊娠期糖尿病的新分类方法:口服葡萄糖耐量试验不同时间点血糖值异常与妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的不良孕产妇和新生儿结局之间关系的研究
背景妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)可导致母婴各种不良妊娠结局,包括妊娠高血压、胎膜早破、早产、巨大儿、胎龄巨大儿(LGA)和新生儿低血糖。以往的研究主要关注 GDM 对孕产妇和新生儿不良结局的总体风险,但专门研究口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)异常结果的不同模式与孕产妇和新生儿不良结局之间关系的研究还很有限。研究目的本研究旨在分析不同OGTT模式的GDM产妇的孕产妇和新生儿结局,并探索一种新的分类方法,能够根据OGTT结果将GDM分为高危亚型(GDM-HR)和低危亚型。研究设计我们在浙江大学医学院附属女子医院开展了一项回顾性队列研究,时间跨度为2015年11月1日至2018年4月30日。研究期间,共纳入 3268 例 GDM 患者。根据 OGTT 的结果,这些 GDM 病例被分为 7 个亚型,并分析了各亚型的构成比例及其孕产妇和新生儿结局。我们创新性地提出了GDM-HR(以空腹血糖[FBG]水平升高为特征,包括T0、T0+1、T0+2和T0+1+2)和低风险GDM(GDM-LR,无FBG升高,包括T1、T2和T1+2)的分类,并比较了两种亚型的孕产妇和新生儿结局。结果(1) 在这组3268例GDM病例中,7种GDM亚型的构成比如下:T0(7.9%,n=260)、T1(24.2%,n=791)、T2(27.4%,n=897)、T0+1(5.4%,n=175)、T0+2(1.7%,n=56)、T1+2(26.2%,n=855)和T0+1+2(7.2%,n=234)。(2)与FBG水平未升高的GDM亚型(GDM-LR)相比,FBG水平升高的GDM亚型(GDM-HR)表现出更严重的不良预后。(3)多重逻辑回归分析显示,与 GDM-LR 组相比,GDM-HR 组的胎儿出生体重增加(约增加 150 克),剖宫产率更高(调整后的几率比 [aOR]:1.45,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.19-1.76)、妊娠高血压疾病(aOR:1.78,95% CI:1.35-2.35)、早产(aOR:1.59,95% CI:1.17-2.16)、巨大儿(aOR:2.66,95% CI:2.07-3.43)、LGA 婴儿(aOR:2.46,95% CI:2.05-2.97)和新生儿低血糖(aOR:2.00,95% CI:1.37-2.91)。偏相关分析表明,胎儿出生体重与 FBG 水平呈正相关,r=0.222,P<.001。多重线性回归表明,FBG 每增加 1 毫摩尔/升,胎儿体重估计会增加约 188 克。结论在 GDM 病例中,FBG 升高的 GDM 亚型(GDM-HR)的组成比率相对较低,但与 FBG 不升高的亚型(GDM-LR)相比,其不良结局的风险更高,值得产科医生加强关注。在临床实践中应用这种新的分类方法可以更好地区分 GDM 并对其进行个体化管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信