A first analysis on the green securitizations in Italy

Francesco Cusano, Danilo Liberati, Stefano Piermattei, Lorenzo Rubeo
{"title":"A first analysis on the green securitizations in Italy","authors":"Francesco Cusano,&nbsp;Danilo Liberati,&nbsp;Stefano Piermattei,&nbsp;Lorenzo Rubeo","doi":"10.1016/j.jclimf.2024.100048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper represents one of the first empirical analyses of the market for green securitizations in Italy. Green securitizations are financial instruments for which there are currently no universally accepted definitions or standard methodologies to identify them. We thus discuss possible definitions and limitations in identifying these instruments. To overcome practical constraints, we argue that, for the time being, a feasible way is to label a securitization as ‘green’ based on the assessment of the sustainability of the economic activity of the borrower of the underlying securitized loans. We also describe the main characteristics of the market for green securitizations originated by banks in Italy during the decade 2010–19. Empirical and econometric analysis show that banks’ securitized loans to ‘brown’ (less sustainable) economic activities grew much more rapidly than those to ‘green’ ones suggesting that banks preferred to keep loans to ‘green’ activities in their balance sheets and to derecognize loans to ‘brown’ ones. Finally, we show that the usual indexes of carbon content of Italian banks’ loans overestimate the amount of financed emissions if they do not take banks’ securitizations into account.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Climate Finance","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Climate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294972802400018X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper represents one of the first empirical analyses of the market for green securitizations in Italy. Green securitizations are financial instruments for which there are currently no universally accepted definitions or standard methodologies to identify them. We thus discuss possible definitions and limitations in identifying these instruments. To overcome practical constraints, we argue that, for the time being, a feasible way is to label a securitization as ‘green’ based on the assessment of the sustainability of the economic activity of the borrower of the underlying securitized loans. We also describe the main characteristics of the market for green securitizations originated by banks in Italy during the decade 2010–19. Empirical and econometric analysis show that banks’ securitized loans to ‘brown’ (less sustainable) economic activities grew much more rapidly than those to ‘green’ ones suggesting that banks preferred to keep loans to ‘green’ activities in their balance sheets and to derecognize loans to ‘brown’ ones. Finally, we show that the usual indexes of carbon content of Italian banks’ loans overestimate the amount of financed emissions if they do not take banks’ securitizations into account.

对意大利绿色证券化的初步分析
本文是对意大利绿色证券化市场进行的首批实证分析之一。绿色证券化是一种金融工具,目前还没有公认的定义或标准方法来识别它们。因此,我们讨论了识别这些工具的可能定义和局限性。为了克服实际限制,我们认为,目前可行的方法是根据对证券化基础贷款借款人经济活动可持续性的评估,将证券化标注为 "绿色"。我们还描述了 2010-19 年十年间意大利银行发起的绿色证券化市场的主要特点。实证分析和计量经济学分析表明,银行对 "棕色"(可持续性较差)经济活动的证券化贷款比对 "绿色 "经济活动的证券化贷款增长更快,这表明银行更愿意将 "绿色 "经济活动的贷款保留在资产负债表中,而对 "棕色 "经济活动的贷款则不予承认。最后,我们表明,如果不考虑银行的证券化,意大利银行贷款碳含量的常规指数会高估融资的排放量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信