Evidence from aphasia suggests a bidirectional relationship between inner speech and executive function

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Mackenzie E. Fama , Joshua D. McCall , Andrew T. DeMarco , Peter E. Turkeltaub
{"title":"Evidence from aphasia suggests a bidirectional relationship between inner speech and executive function","authors":"Mackenzie E. Fama ,&nbsp;Joshua D. McCall ,&nbsp;Andrew T. DeMarco ,&nbsp;Peter E. Turkeltaub","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research over the past several decades has revealed that non-linguistic cognitive impairments can appear alongside language deficits in individuals with aphasia. One vulnerable cognitive domain is executive function, an umbrella term for the higher-level cognitive processes that allow us to direct our behavior towards a goal. Studies in healthy adults reveal that executive function abilities are supported by inner speech, the ability to use language silently in one's head. Therefore, inner speech may mediate the connection between language and executive function deficits in individuals with aphasia. Here, we investigated whether inner speech ability may link language and cognitive impairments in 59 adults with chronic, post-stroke aphasia. We used two approaches to measure inner speech: one based on internal retrieval of words and one based on internal retrieval plus silent manipulation of the retrieved phonological forms. Then, we examined relationships between these two approaches to measuring inner speech and five aspects of executive function ability: response inhibition, conflict monitoring/resolution, general task-switching ability, phonological control, and semantic control. We also looked for dissociations between inner speech ability and executive function ability. Our results show tentative relationships between inner speech (across multiple measurement approaches) and all aspects of executive function except for response inhibition. We also found evidence for a double dissociation: many participants show intact executive function despite poor inner speech, and vice versa, so neither process is strictly reliant on the other. We suggest that this work provides preliminary evidence of a bidirectional relationship between inner speech and executive function: inner speech supports some aspects of executive function via internal self-cueing and certain aspects of executive function support performance on complex inner speech tasks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224002124/pdfft?md5=eda4b9a1bc6178e83cdeeb81785a35e9&pid=1-s2.0-S0028393224002124-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224002124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research over the past several decades has revealed that non-linguistic cognitive impairments can appear alongside language deficits in individuals with aphasia. One vulnerable cognitive domain is executive function, an umbrella term for the higher-level cognitive processes that allow us to direct our behavior towards a goal. Studies in healthy adults reveal that executive function abilities are supported by inner speech, the ability to use language silently in one's head. Therefore, inner speech may mediate the connection between language and executive function deficits in individuals with aphasia. Here, we investigated whether inner speech ability may link language and cognitive impairments in 59 adults with chronic, post-stroke aphasia. We used two approaches to measure inner speech: one based on internal retrieval of words and one based on internal retrieval plus silent manipulation of the retrieved phonological forms. Then, we examined relationships between these two approaches to measuring inner speech and five aspects of executive function ability: response inhibition, conflict monitoring/resolution, general task-switching ability, phonological control, and semantic control. We also looked for dissociations between inner speech ability and executive function ability. Our results show tentative relationships between inner speech (across multiple measurement approaches) and all aspects of executive function except for response inhibition. We also found evidence for a double dissociation: many participants show intact executive function despite poor inner speech, and vice versa, so neither process is strictly reliant on the other. We suggest that this work provides preliminary evidence of a bidirectional relationship between inner speech and executive function: inner speech supports some aspects of executive function via internal self-cueing and certain aspects of executive function support performance on complex inner speech tasks.

来自失语症的证据表明,内心言语与执行功能之间存在双向关系
过去几十年的研究表明,失语症患者在出现语言障碍的同时,也会出现非语言认知障碍。其中一个易受影响的认知领域是执行功能,它是高层次认知过程的总称,使我们能够将行为导向目标。对健康成年人的研究表明,执行功能能力得到内心言语的支持,即在头脑中默默使用语言的能力。因此,内心言语可能会介导失语症患者的语言和执行功能缺陷之间的联系。在此,我们研究了内心言语能力是否会将 59 名中风后慢性失语症成人的语言和认知障碍联系起来。我们采用了两种方法来测量内心言语能力:一种是基于单词的内部检索,另一种是基于内部检索加上对检索语音形式的无声操作。然后,我们研究了这两种测量内心言语的方法与以下五个方面的执行功能能力之间的关系:反应抑制、冲突监控/解决、一般任务切换能力、语音控制和语义控制。我们还研究了内心言语能力与执行功能能力之间的差异。我们的研究结果表明,内心言语能力(通过多种测量方法)与除反应抑制能力以外的所有执行功能之间都存在初步的关系。我们还发现了双重分离的证据:许多参与者尽管内心言语能力较差,但却表现出完整的执行功能,反之亦然,因此这两个过程都不严格依赖于另一个过程。我们认为,这项研究为内心言语和执行功能之间的双向关系提供了初步证据:内心言语通过内部自我暗示支持执行功能的某些方面,而执行功能的某些方面则支持复杂内心言语任务的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信