An uncoupled ductile fracture criterion for a wide range of stress states in sheet metal forming failure prediction

IF 4.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
{"title":"An uncoupled ductile fracture criterion for a wide range of stress states in sheet metal forming failure prediction","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In industrial production, sheet metal rupture will inevitably occur in the process of forming, especially in the shape of complex, relatively small thickness of the sheet. It is vital to accurately predict the failure of ductile metals under various working conditions. To deal with the problem, an uncoupled ductile fracture criterion (DFC) for a broad range of stress states is proposed based on the micro-mechanism of ductile fracture of metals, which redefines the relationship between the number of void nucleating and the equivalent plastic strain and takes into account the different deformation modes of the voids in the growth stage. Then, in order to verify the validity and advantages of the proposed DFC, the 3D fracture surface of AA 2024-T351 and AISI 1045 steel are constructed by the new criterion based on their fracture data under various stress states, and compared with the commonly used DF2016 criterion and Hu criterion. The prediction results show that the new criterion is better than them, both in terms of the maximum prediction error and the average prediction error. Furthermore, to further prove the effectiveness of the proposed model, five samples are designed for tension tests to calibrate the new DFC using a hybrid experimental–numerical approach, and the calibrated criterion is applied to cupping simulations of AA 6061 and compared with cupping experimental results. The results indicate that the Erichsen cupping number (IE) of the cupping simulation and experiment are 6.88 mm and 7.05 mm, respectively, and the error between them is only 2.411 %, and the location of the fracture is also basically the same. Therefore, all comparison results show that the proposed DFC can forecast the fracture problem in sheet forming more accurately under various stress states.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424006271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In industrial production, sheet metal rupture will inevitably occur in the process of forming, especially in the shape of complex, relatively small thickness of the sheet. It is vital to accurately predict the failure of ductile metals under various working conditions. To deal with the problem, an uncoupled ductile fracture criterion (DFC) for a broad range of stress states is proposed based on the micro-mechanism of ductile fracture of metals, which redefines the relationship between the number of void nucleating and the equivalent plastic strain and takes into account the different deformation modes of the voids in the growth stage. Then, in order to verify the validity and advantages of the proposed DFC, the 3D fracture surface of AA 2024-T351 and AISI 1045 steel are constructed by the new criterion based on their fracture data under various stress states, and compared with the commonly used DF2016 criterion and Hu criterion. The prediction results show that the new criterion is better than them, both in terms of the maximum prediction error and the average prediction error. Furthermore, to further prove the effectiveness of the proposed model, five samples are designed for tension tests to calibrate the new DFC using a hybrid experimental–numerical approach, and the calibrated criterion is applied to cupping simulations of AA 6061 and compared with cupping experimental results. The results indicate that the Erichsen cupping number (IE) of the cupping simulation and experiment are 6.88 mm and 7.05 mm, respectively, and the error between them is only 2.411 %, and the location of the fracture is also basically the same. Therefore, all comparison results show that the proposed DFC can forecast the fracture problem in sheet forming more accurately under various stress states.

适用于金属板成型失效预测中各种应力状态的非耦合韧性断裂准则
在工业生产中,金属板材在成型过程中难免会发生断裂,尤其是形状复杂、厚度相对较小的板材。如何准确预测韧性金属在各种工况下的断裂至关重要。为了解决这个问题,我们根据金属韧性断裂的微观机制,重新定义了空洞成核数量与等效塑性应变之间的关系,并考虑了空洞在生长阶段的不同变形模式,提出了一种适用于广泛应力状态的非耦合韧性断裂准则(DFC)。然后,为了验证所提出的 DFC 的有效性和优势,根据 AA 2024-T351 和 AISI 1045 钢在各种应力状态下的断裂数据,用新准则构建了它们的三维断裂面,并与常用的 DF2016 准则和 Hu 准则进行了比较。预测结果表明,无论是最大预测误差还是平均预测误差,新准则都优于它们。此外,为了进一步证明所提模型的有效性,还设计了五个样品进行拉伸试验,采用实验-数值混合方法对新的 DFC 进行校准,并将校准后的准则应用于 AA 6061 的杯突模拟,与杯突实验结果进行比较。结果表明,杯突模拟和实验的埃里希森杯突数(IE)分别为 6.88 mm 和 7.05 mm,两者之间的误差仅为 2.411 %,断裂位置也基本一致。因此,所有比较结果表明,所提出的 DFC 可以在各种应力状态下更准确地预测板材成形中的断裂问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信