{"title":"Hierarchical Partitioning Forecaster","authors":"Christopher Mattern","doi":"10.1016/j.physd.2024.134335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this work we consider a new family of algorithms for sequential prediction, Hierarchical Partitioning Forecasters (HPFs). Our goal is to provide appealing theoretical - regret guarantees on a powerful model class - and practical - empirical performance comparable to deep networks - properties <em>at the same time</em>. We built upon three principles: hierarchically partitioning the feature space into sub-spaces, blending forecasters specialized to each sub-space and learning HPFs via local online learning applied to these individual forecasters. Following these principles allows us to obtain regret guarantees, where Constant Partitioning Forecasters (CPFs) serve as competitor. A CPF partitions the feature space into sub-spaces and predicts with a fixed forecaster per sub-space. Fixing a hierarchical partition <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span> and considering any CPF with a partition that can be constructed using elements of <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span> we provide two guarantees: first, a generic one that unveils how local online learning determines regret of learning the entire HPF online; second, a concrete instance that considers HPF with linear forecasters (LHPF) and exp-concave losses where we obtain <span><math><mrow><mi>O</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>k</mi><mo>log</mo><mi>T</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> regret for sequences of length <span><math><mi>T</mi></math></span> where <span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> is a measure of complexity for the competing CPF. Finally, we provide experiments that compare LHPF to various baselines, including state of the art deep learning models, in precipitation nowcasting. Our results indicate that LHPF is competitive in various settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167278924002860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this work we consider a new family of algorithms for sequential prediction, Hierarchical Partitioning Forecasters (HPFs). Our goal is to provide appealing theoretical - regret guarantees on a powerful model class - and practical - empirical performance comparable to deep networks - properties at the same time. We built upon three principles: hierarchically partitioning the feature space into sub-spaces, blending forecasters specialized to each sub-space and learning HPFs via local online learning applied to these individual forecasters. Following these principles allows us to obtain regret guarantees, where Constant Partitioning Forecasters (CPFs) serve as competitor. A CPF partitions the feature space into sub-spaces and predicts with a fixed forecaster per sub-space. Fixing a hierarchical partition and considering any CPF with a partition that can be constructed using elements of we provide two guarantees: first, a generic one that unveils how local online learning determines regret of learning the entire HPF online; second, a concrete instance that considers HPF with linear forecasters (LHPF) and exp-concave losses where we obtain regret for sequences of length where is a measure of complexity for the competing CPF. Finally, we provide experiments that compare LHPF to various baselines, including state of the art deep learning models, in precipitation nowcasting. Our results indicate that LHPF is competitive in various settings.