A physics-informed neural network framework for multi-physics coupling microfluidic problems

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Runze Sun , Hyogu Jeong , Jiachen Zhao , Yixing Gou , Emilie Sauret , Zirui Li , Yuantong Gu
{"title":"A physics-informed neural network framework for multi-physics coupling microfluidic problems","authors":"Runze Sun ,&nbsp;Hyogu Jeong ,&nbsp;Jiachen Zhao ,&nbsp;Yixing Gou ,&nbsp;Emilie Sauret ,&nbsp;Zirui Li ,&nbsp;Yuantong Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microfluidic systems have various scientific and industrial applications, providing a powerful means to manipulate fluids and particles on a small scale. As a crucial method to underlying mechanisms and guiding the design of microfluidic devices, traditional numerical methods such as the Finite Element Method (FEM) simulating microfluidic systems are limited by the computational cost and mesh generating of resolving the smaller spatiotemporal features. Recently, a Physics-informed neural network (PINN) was introduced as a powerful numerical tool for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). PINN simplifies discretizing computational domains, ensuring accurate results and significantly improving computational efficiency after training. Therefore, we propose a PINN-based modeling framework to solve the governing equations of electrokinetic microfluidic systems. The neural networks, designed to respect the governing physics law such as Nernst-Planck, Poisson, and Navier-Stokes (NPN) equations defined by PDEs, are trained to approximate accurate solutions without requiring any labeled data. Several typical electrokinetic problems, such as Electromigration, Ion concentration polarization (ICP), and Electroosmotic flow (EOF), were investigated in this study. Notably, the findings demonstrate the exceptional capacity of the PINN framework to deliver high-precision outcomes for highly coupled multi-physics problems, particularly highlighted by the EOF case. When using 20 × 10 sample points to train the model (the same mesh nodes used for FEM), the relative error of EOF velocity from the PINN is ∼0.02 %, whereas the relative error of the FEM is ∼1.23 %. In addition, PINNs demonstrate excellent interpolation capability, the relative error of the EOF velocity decreases slightly at the interpolation points compared to training points, approximately 0.0001 %. More importantly, in simulating strongly nonlinear problems such as the ICP case, PINNs exhibit a unique advantage as they can provide accurate solutions with sparse sample points, whereas FEM fails to produce correct physical results using the same mesh nodes. Although the training time for PINN (100–200 min) is higher than the FEM computational time, the ability of PINN to achieve high accuracy results on sparse sample points, strong capability to fit nonlinear problems highlights its potential for reducing computational resources. We also demonstrate the ability of PINN to solve inverse problems in microfluidic systems and use transfer learning to accelerate PINN training for various species parameter settings. The numerical results demonstrate that the PINN model shows promising advantages in achieving high-accuracy solutions, modeling strong nolinear problems, strong interpolation capability, and inferring unknown parameters in simulating multi-physics coupling microfluidic systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":287,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Fluids","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 106421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793024002524/pdfft?md5=22f06a36ad9c1ce4d32a8b888f3ad798&pid=1-s2.0-S0045793024002524-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793024002524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microfluidic systems have various scientific and industrial applications, providing a powerful means to manipulate fluids and particles on a small scale. As a crucial method to underlying mechanisms and guiding the design of microfluidic devices, traditional numerical methods such as the Finite Element Method (FEM) simulating microfluidic systems are limited by the computational cost and mesh generating of resolving the smaller spatiotemporal features. Recently, a Physics-informed neural network (PINN) was introduced as a powerful numerical tool for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). PINN simplifies discretizing computational domains, ensuring accurate results and significantly improving computational efficiency after training. Therefore, we propose a PINN-based modeling framework to solve the governing equations of electrokinetic microfluidic systems. The neural networks, designed to respect the governing physics law such as Nernst-Planck, Poisson, and Navier-Stokes (NPN) equations defined by PDEs, are trained to approximate accurate solutions without requiring any labeled data. Several typical electrokinetic problems, such as Electromigration, Ion concentration polarization (ICP), and Electroosmotic flow (EOF), were investigated in this study. Notably, the findings demonstrate the exceptional capacity of the PINN framework to deliver high-precision outcomes for highly coupled multi-physics problems, particularly highlighted by the EOF case. When using 20 × 10 sample points to train the model (the same mesh nodes used for FEM), the relative error of EOF velocity from the PINN is ∼0.02 %, whereas the relative error of the FEM is ∼1.23 %. In addition, PINNs demonstrate excellent interpolation capability, the relative error of the EOF velocity decreases slightly at the interpolation points compared to training points, approximately 0.0001 %. More importantly, in simulating strongly nonlinear problems such as the ICP case, PINNs exhibit a unique advantage as they can provide accurate solutions with sparse sample points, whereas FEM fails to produce correct physical results using the same mesh nodes. Although the training time for PINN (100–200 min) is higher than the FEM computational time, the ability of PINN to achieve high accuracy results on sparse sample points, strong capability to fit nonlinear problems highlights its potential for reducing computational resources. We also demonstrate the ability of PINN to solve inverse problems in microfluidic systems and use transfer learning to accelerate PINN training for various species parameter settings. The numerical results demonstrate that the PINN model shows promising advantages in achieving high-accuracy solutions, modeling strong nolinear problems, strong interpolation capability, and inferring unknown parameters in simulating multi-physics coupling microfluidic systems.

用于解决多物理场耦合微流体问题的物理信息神经网络框架
微流体系统具有各种科学和工业应用,为在小尺度上操纵流体和颗粒提供了强有力的手段。作为微流体设备的基本机制和指导设计的重要方法,传统的数值方法,如有限元法(FEM)模拟微流体系统,受到计算成本和网格生成的限制,难以解决较小的时空特征。最近,物理信息神经网络(PINN)作为一种强大的数值工具被引入,用于求解偏微分方程(PDE)。PINN 简化了计算域的离散化,确保了精确的结果,并显著提高了训练后的计算效率。因此,我们提出了一个基于 PINN 的建模框架,用于求解电动微流控系统的控制方程。神经网络的设计尊重物理定律,如由 PDEs 定义的 Nernst-Planck、Poisson 和 Navier-Stokes(NPN)方程,经过训练后,无需任何标记数据即可逼近精确的解决方案。本研究调查了几个典型的电动力学问题,如电迁移、离子浓度极化(ICP)和电渗流(EOF)。值得注意的是,研究结果表明,PINN 框架有能力为高度耦合的多物理场问题提供高精度结果,这一点在 EOF 案例中尤为突出。当使用 20 × 10 样本点训练模型时(与 FEM 使用的网格节点相同),PINN 得出的 EOF 速度相对误差为 0.02%,而 FEM 的相对误差为 1.23%。此外,PINN 还表现出卓越的插值能力,与训练点相比,插值点的 EOF 速度相对误差略有下降,约为 0.0001 %。更重要的是,在模拟强非线性问题(如 ICP 案例)时,PINNs 表现出独特的优势,因为它们可以用稀疏的样本点提供精确的解决方案,而 FEM 在使用相同的网格节点时却无法生成正确的物理结果。虽然 PINN 的训练时间(100-200 分钟)高于有限元计算时间,但 PINN 在稀疏样本点上获得高精度结果的能力,以及拟合非线性问题的强大能力,凸显了其在减少计算资源方面的潜力。我们还展示了 PINN 解决微流控系统逆问题的能力,并利用迁移学习加速了不同物种参数设置下的 PINN 训练。数值结果表明,在模拟多物理场耦合微流控系统时,PINN 模型在实现高精度求解、对强非线性问题建模、强大的插值能力以及推断未知参数等方面显示出了很好的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Fluids
Computers & Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Fluids is multidisciplinary. The term ''fluid'' is interpreted in the broadest sense. Hydro- and aerodynamics, high-speed and physical gas dynamics, turbulence and flow stability, multiphase flow, rheology, tribology and fluid-structure interaction are all of interest, provided that computer technique plays a significant role in the associated studies or design methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信