Review of the missing link between field and modeled submarine debris flows: Scale effects of physical modeling

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Clarence Edward Choi, Jiantao Yu, Jiaqi Zhang
{"title":"Review of the missing link between field and modeled submarine debris flows: Scale effects of physical modeling","authors":"Clarence Edward Choi,&nbsp;Jiantao Yu,&nbsp;Jiaqi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Submarine debris flows occur under the cloak of the sea and are giants among other types of landslides on planet Earth. They pose a significant threat to sustainable offshore development and marine ecosystems. Existing research on these flows mainly rely on back-analyzing field events and conducting miniaturized experiments. However, it is unclear whether the dynamics of miniaturized flows are similar to field ones. In this review, dimensional analysis is used to evaluate laboratory and field data collated from the literature to compare the dynamics of submarine debris flows at different scales. Miniaturized flows are demonstrated to have disproportionately low yield stress and viscosity compared to field flows. The low yield stress is caused by the need to reduce the clay content of a model debris mixture so that it can flow under substantially reduced gravitational driving stresses in laboratory conditions. Consequently, some proposed scaling relationships in the literature derived from laboratory experiments need to be used with caution. Specifically, both the Reynolds and Bingham numbers cannot independently provide a scale-invariant criterion for distinguishing between laminar and turbulent flows. Instead, the Hampton number, with a threshold &gt;0.001, is proposed for the design of the yield stress and clay contents of laboratory flows. Moreover, reduced model viscous stress drastically reduces erosion potential, which limits the existing understanding of the excess fluid pressures generated at the flow-bed interface, and thus flow mobility. The mobility of field flows is generally attributed to hydroplaning. However, this conjecture mainly stems from experiments with impervious boundaries. Such an idealization exaggerates the effects of excess fluid pressures that develop during hydroplaning. An enhanced understanding of the differences in dynamics between field and modeled flows can improve the design of future experiments to model submarine debris flows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 104911"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224002381","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Submarine debris flows occur under the cloak of the sea and are giants among other types of landslides on planet Earth. They pose a significant threat to sustainable offshore development and marine ecosystems. Existing research on these flows mainly rely on back-analyzing field events and conducting miniaturized experiments. However, it is unclear whether the dynamics of miniaturized flows are similar to field ones. In this review, dimensional analysis is used to evaluate laboratory and field data collated from the literature to compare the dynamics of submarine debris flows at different scales. Miniaturized flows are demonstrated to have disproportionately low yield stress and viscosity compared to field flows. The low yield stress is caused by the need to reduce the clay content of a model debris mixture so that it can flow under substantially reduced gravitational driving stresses in laboratory conditions. Consequently, some proposed scaling relationships in the literature derived from laboratory experiments need to be used with caution. Specifically, both the Reynolds and Bingham numbers cannot independently provide a scale-invariant criterion for distinguishing between laminar and turbulent flows. Instead, the Hampton number, with a threshold >0.001, is proposed for the design of the yield stress and clay contents of laboratory flows. Moreover, reduced model viscous stress drastically reduces erosion potential, which limits the existing understanding of the excess fluid pressures generated at the flow-bed interface, and thus flow mobility. The mobility of field flows is generally attributed to hydroplaning. However, this conjecture mainly stems from experiments with impervious boundaries. Such an idealization exaggerates the effects of excess fluid pressures that develop during hydroplaning. An enhanced understanding of the differences in dynamics between field and modeled flows can improve the design of future experiments to model submarine debris flows.

审查实地与模型海底泥石流之间缺失的联系:物理建模的规模效应
海底泥石流发生在海的隐蔽处,是地球上其他类型滑坡中的巨型滑坡。它们对近海可持续发展和海洋生态系统构成重大威胁。现有的研究主要依赖于对现场事件的反向分析和微型实验。然而,目前还不清楚小型化流体的动态是否与野外流体相似。本综述采用维度分析法评估从文献中整理的实验室和实地数据,以比较不同尺度的海底碎屑流动力学。研究表明,与野外流动相比,小型化流动的屈服应力和粘度过低。产生低屈服应力的原因是需要降低模型碎片混合物的粘土含量,使其能够在实验室条件下在重力驱动应力大幅降低的情况下流动。因此,需要谨慎使用文献中提出的一些源自实验室实验的比例关系。具体来说,雷诺数和宾厄姆数都不能独立提供区分层流和湍流的尺度不变标准。取而代之的是汉普顿数,其临界值为 0.001,用于设计实验室流动的屈服应力和粘土含量。此外,模型粘性应力的降低大大降低了侵蚀潜力,这限制了对流床界面产生的过大流体压力的现有理解,从而限制了流动的流动性。野外流动的流动性一般归因于水力平移。然而,这种猜测主要源于不透水边界的实验。这种理想化的方法夸大了水漂过程中产生的过大流体压力的影响。加强对现场流与模型流之间动力学差异的了解,可以改进未来模拟海底碎屑流的实验设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信