Numerical simulation of the nanofluid flow and heat transfer in porous microchannels with different flow path arrangements using single-phase and two-phase models

Q1 Chemical Engineering
{"title":"Numerical simulation of the nanofluid flow and heat transfer in porous microchannels with different flow path arrangements using single-phase and two-phase models","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The fluid flow and nanofluid heat transfer are studied in this research through porous microchannels with different flow path arrangements in single-phase and two-phase modes (Mode I and Mode II). In Mode I, the flow inlet is located in the longitudinal direction of the microchannel (single-way path), while in Mode II, the flow inlet is placed in the transverse direction of the microchannel (two-way path).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The finite volume method was utilized to simulate the flow and heat transfer. The porous medium is supposed homogeneous and isotropic with a porosity coefficient of 0.9 and it is assumed that the local thermal equilibrium is established between the fluid and the solid. The Eulerian-Eulerian mixture model is applied for modeling the two-phase flow. As demonstrated, mode II always has a higher heat transfer rate than mode I. However, in contrast, the pressure drop of mode I is lower than in mode II. Besides, using the two-phase model predicts a higher heat transfer rate than the single-phase model in all cases.</p></div><div><h3>Significant Findings</h3><p>The percent increase of pressure in mode II compared to mode I in <em>Re</em>= 100 and 400 is obtained as 11.5 % and 20.8 %, respectively. At <em>Re</em>= 100 in mode I, the heat transfer percentage increases by 52.6 % from Da=1 compared to a case without the porous foam. Whilst, at <em>Re</em>= 400, the rise is found to be 45.5 %. In mode II, at <em>Re</em>=100, the heat transfer percentage increases by 63.9 % from Da= 1 compared to a case without the porous foam. Whilst, at <em>Re</em>= 400, the rise is found to be 43.3 %. Finally, Mode II microchannel has more heat transfer rate and pressure drop than Mode I.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36341,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Thermofluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202724002878/pdfft?md5=cdb2f874f5b96cd5c91863bb29979a7a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666202724002878-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Thermofluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202724002878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The fluid flow and nanofluid heat transfer are studied in this research through porous microchannels with different flow path arrangements in single-phase and two-phase modes (Mode I and Mode II). In Mode I, the flow inlet is located in the longitudinal direction of the microchannel (single-way path), while in Mode II, the flow inlet is placed in the transverse direction of the microchannel (two-way path).

Methods

The finite volume method was utilized to simulate the flow and heat transfer. The porous medium is supposed homogeneous and isotropic with a porosity coefficient of 0.9 and it is assumed that the local thermal equilibrium is established between the fluid and the solid. The Eulerian-Eulerian mixture model is applied for modeling the two-phase flow. As demonstrated, mode II always has a higher heat transfer rate than mode I. However, in contrast, the pressure drop of mode I is lower than in mode II. Besides, using the two-phase model predicts a higher heat transfer rate than the single-phase model in all cases.

Significant Findings

The percent increase of pressure in mode II compared to mode I in Re= 100 and 400 is obtained as 11.5 % and 20.8 %, respectively. At Re= 100 in mode I, the heat transfer percentage increases by 52.6 % from Da=1 compared to a case without the porous foam. Whilst, at Re= 400, the rise is found to be 45.5 %. In mode II, at Re=100, the heat transfer percentage increases by 63.9 % from Da= 1 compared to a case without the porous foam. Whilst, at Re= 400, the rise is found to be 43.3 %. Finally, Mode II microchannel has more heat transfer rate and pressure drop than Mode I.

使用单相和两相模型数值模拟多孔微通道中不同流道排列的纳米流体流动和传热
背景本研究以单相和两相模式(模式 I 和模式 II)研究了流体在多孔微通道中的流动和纳米流体传热。在模式 I 中,流动入口位于微通道的纵向(单向流动),而在模式 II 中,流动入口位于微通道的横向(双向流动)。多孔介质假定为各向同性的均质介质,孔隙率系数为 0.9,并假定流体和固体之间建立了局部热平衡。欧拉-欧拉混合模型用于模拟两相流。结果表明,模式 II 的传热率始终高于模式 I,但相比之下,模式 I 的压降低于模式 II。此外,在所有情况下,使用两相流模型预测的传热率都高于单相流模型。在 Re= 100 的模式 I 中,与没有多孔泡沫的情况相比,Da=1 的传热百分比增加了 52.6%。而在 Re= 400 时,则增加了 45.5%。在模式 II 中,当 Re=100 时,与没有多孔泡沫的情况相比,传热百分比从 Da=1 开始增加了 63.9%。而在 Re= 400 时,则增加了 43.3%。最后,与模式 I 相比,模式 II 的微通道具有更高的传热率和压降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Thermofluids
International Journal of Thermofluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信