Probabilistic framework for quantifying human flight failure rate to landslides

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
{"title":"Probabilistic framework for quantifying human flight failure rate to landslides","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Landslides pose a severe risk to humans, but accurately quantifying human risk remains challenging due to the less-studied fleeing process of humans during landslides. This study introduces a flight failure rate to represent the capacity of humans to escape from a landslide. A novel probabilistic framework for flight failure rate assessment is proposed by integrating uncertainties in both landslide runout and human flight. This framework distinguishes the individual flight failure rates at different locations and the total flight failure rate of the population in a landslide-threatened area. To aid in applying this framework in real-world communities, a network-based human flight model, embedded with the Ant Colony Optimization algorithm, is developed to simulate the heterogeneous human flight behaviors subjected to landslides. A catastrophic landslide in a community of Shenzhen, China, which caused 77 deaths, 17 injuries, and 900 homeless, serves as a case study to perform human flight simulation and flight failure rate assessment. Results indicate that the approach provides reliable and logical evaluations of individual and total flight failure rates. Individual flight failure rate varies significantly in spatial distribution due to differences in landslide available time and running distances to escape the landslide, which differs from the total flight failure rate of the population. Advancing and narrowing the distribution of response time, reducing the delayed time, and implementing pre-planned flight paths can significantly reduce the total flight failure rate and mitigate high-risk areas. This probabilistic framework provides a promising and valuable reference for landslide risk assessment and human disaster mitigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795224003235","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landslides pose a severe risk to humans, but accurately quantifying human risk remains challenging due to the less-studied fleeing process of humans during landslides. This study introduces a flight failure rate to represent the capacity of humans to escape from a landslide. A novel probabilistic framework for flight failure rate assessment is proposed by integrating uncertainties in both landslide runout and human flight. This framework distinguishes the individual flight failure rates at different locations and the total flight failure rate of the population in a landslide-threatened area. To aid in applying this framework in real-world communities, a network-based human flight model, embedded with the Ant Colony Optimization algorithm, is developed to simulate the heterogeneous human flight behaviors subjected to landslides. A catastrophic landslide in a community of Shenzhen, China, which caused 77 deaths, 17 injuries, and 900 homeless, serves as a case study to perform human flight simulation and flight failure rate assessment. Results indicate that the approach provides reliable and logical evaluations of individual and total flight failure rates. Individual flight failure rate varies significantly in spatial distribution due to differences in landslide available time and running distances to escape the landslide, which differs from the total flight failure rate of the population. Advancing and narrowing the distribution of response time, reducing the delayed time, and implementing pre-planned flight paths can significantly reduce the total flight failure rate and mitigate high-risk areas. This probabilistic framework provides a promising and valuable reference for landslide risk assessment and human disaster mitigation.

量化山体滑坡人类飞行故障率的概率框架
山体滑坡对人类构成严重威胁,但由于对山体滑坡期间人类逃离过程的研究较少,因此准确量化人类风险仍具有挑战性。本研究引入了逃生失败率,以表示人类从滑坡中逃生的能力。通过整合滑坡冲刷和人类逃生过程中的不确定性,提出了一种用于评估逃生失败率的新型概率框架。该框架区分了不同地点的单个飞行失败率和受滑坡威胁地区人口的总飞行失败率。为了帮助将这一框架应用于现实世界的社区,我们开发了一个基于网络的人类飞行模型,该模型嵌入了蚁群优化算法,用于模拟受滑坡影响的异质人类飞行行为。以中国深圳某社区发生的造成 77 人死亡、17 人受伤和 900 人无家可归的灾难性山体滑坡为案例,进行了人类飞行模拟和飞行故障率评估。结果表明,该方法可对单个飞行故障率和总飞行故障率进行可靠、合理的评估。由于滑坡可用时间和逃离滑坡的奔跑距离不同,个体飞行失败率在空间分布上存在显著差异,这与人口的总飞行失败率不同。提前并缩小响应时间的分布,减少延迟时间,实施预先计划的飞行路径,可以大大降低总飞行失败率,缓解高风险区域的飞行失败率。这一概率框架为滑坡风险评估和人类减灾提供了有前景、有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信