{"title":"Learning and interpretation in a world of disinformation: Footnotes on ignorance, conflict, and ambiguity","authors":"Claus Rerup , Bryan Spencer","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2024.101358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Processes of experiential learning are instruments of intelligence. Yet, these processes have limitations. We explore how disinformation – invalid information or experience that actors present as valid to deliberately deceive or persuade targets and achieve a goal – challenges the standard model of experiential learning in the Carnegie School tradition. We examine how disinformation not only elevates the importance of interpretation in experiential learning but also generates three problems that can undermine effective learning: ignorance, conflict, and ambiguity. We outline how organizations and communities might approach these challenges and problems. We also propose ideas and future research that might help actors imagine how to interpret and learn effectively from disinformation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522124000393/pdfft?md5=cd2908dfebf20c213472a4fa96d8c125&pid=1-s2.0-S0956522124000393-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522124000393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Processes of experiential learning are instruments of intelligence. Yet, these processes have limitations. We explore how disinformation – invalid information or experience that actors present as valid to deliberately deceive or persuade targets and achieve a goal – challenges the standard model of experiential learning in the Carnegie School tradition. We examine how disinformation not only elevates the importance of interpretation in experiential learning but also generates three problems that can undermine effective learning: ignorance, conflict, and ambiguity. We outline how organizations and communities might approach these challenges and problems. We also propose ideas and future research that might help actors imagine how to interpret and learn effectively from disinformation.
期刊介绍：
The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
