In Vivo Assessment of a Triple Periodic Minimal Surface Based Biomimmetic Gyroid as an Implant Material in a Rabbit Tibia Model

IF 5.7 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Pearlin Amaan Khan, Ansheed Raheem, Cheirmadurai Kalirajan, Konda Gokuldoss Prashanth and Geetha Manivasagam*, 
{"title":"In Vivo Assessment of a Triple Periodic Minimal Surface Based Biomimmetic Gyroid as an Implant Material in a Rabbit Tibia Model","authors":"Pearlin Amaan Khan,&nbsp;Ansheed Raheem,&nbsp;Cheirmadurai Kalirajan,&nbsp;Konda Gokuldoss Prashanth and Geetha Manivasagam*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c0001610.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Biomimetic approaches to implant construction are a rising frontier in implantology. Triple Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS)-based additively manufactured gyroid structures offer a mean curvature of zero, rendering this structure an ideal porous architecture. Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of these structures to effectively mimic the mechanical cues required for optimal implant construction. The porous nature of gyroid materials enhances bone ingrowth, thereby improving implant stability within the body. This enhancement is attributed to the increased surface area of the gyroid structure, which is approximately 185% higher than that of a dense material of the same form factor. This larger surface area allows for enhanced cellular attachment and nutrient circulation facilitated by the porous channels. This study aims to evaluate the biological performance of a gyroid-based Ti6Al-4V implant material compared to a dense alloy counterpart. Cellular viability was assessed using the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay, which demonstrated that the gyroid surface allowed marginally higher viability than dense material. The <i>in vivo</i> integration was studied over 6 weeks using a rabbit tibia model and characterized using X-ray, micro-CT, and histopathological examination. With a metal volume of 8.1%, the gyroid exhibited a bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) ratio of 9.6%, which is 11-fold higher than that of dense metal (0.8%). Histological assessments revealed neovascularization, in-bone growth, and the presence of a Haversian system in the gyroid structure, hinting at superior osteointegration.</p>","PeriodicalId":29798,"journal":{"name":"ACS Materials Au","volume":"4 5","pages":"479–488 479–488"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Materials Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomimetic approaches to implant construction are a rising frontier in implantology. Triple Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS)-based additively manufactured gyroid structures offer a mean curvature of zero, rendering this structure an ideal porous architecture. Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of these structures to effectively mimic the mechanical cues required for optimal implant construction. The porous nature of gyroid materials enhances bone ingrowth, thereby improving implant stability within the body. This enhancement is attributed to the increased surface area of the gyroid structure, which is approximately 185% higher than that of a dense material of the same form factor. This larger surface area allows for enhanced cellular attachment and nutrient circulation facilitated by the porous channels. This study aims to evaluate the biological performance of a gyroid-based Ti6Al-4V implant material compared to a dense alloy counterpart. Cellular viability was assessed using the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay, which demonstrated that the gyroid surface allowed marginally higher viability than dense material. The in vivo integration was studied over 6 weeks using a rabbit tibia model and characterized using X-ray, micro-CT, and histopathological examination. With a metal volume of 8.1%, the gyroid exhibited a bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) ratio of 9.6%, which is 11-fold higher than that of dense metal (0.8%). Histological assessments revealed neovascularization, in-bone growth, and the presence of a Haversian system in the gyroid structure, hinting at superior osteointegration.

Abstract Image

在兔胫骨模型中对作为植入材料的三周期极小表面生物仿生陀螺仪进行体内评估
仿生植入物制造方法是植入学的一个新兴前沿领域。基于三周期最小表面(TPMS)的添加剂制造陀螺结构的平均曲率为零,使这种结构成为理想的多孔结构。之前的研究已经证明,这些结构能够有效模拟最佳种植体结构所需的机械线索。陀螺状材料的多孔性能促进骨的生长,从而提高植入物在体内的稳定性。这种提高归功于陀螺结构表面积的增加,与相同形状系数的致密材料相比,陀螺结构的表面积增加了约 185%。更大的表面积可通过多孔通道促进细胞附着和营养循环。本研究旨在评估基于陀螺结构的 Ti6Al-4V 植入材料与致密合金植入材料相比的生物性能。使用乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)检测法评估了细胞存活率,结果表明陀螺表面的细胞存活率略高于致密材料。使用兔子胫骨模型对体内整合情况进行了为期 6 周的研究,并使用 X 射线、显微 CT 和组织病理学检查对其进行了鉴定。在金属体积为 8.1% 的情况下,陀螺表面的骨体积/总体积(BV/TV)比为 9.6%,是致密金属(0.8%)的 11 倍。组织学评估显示,陀螺结构中出现了新生血管、骨内生长和哈弗系统,这表明其骨整合性极佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Materials Au
ACS Materials Au 材料科学-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACS Materials Au is an open access journal publishing letters articles reviews and perspectives describing high-quality research at the forefront of fundamental and applied research and at the interface between materials and other disciplines such as chemistry engineering and biology. Papers that showcase multidisciplinary and innovative materials research addressing global challenges are especially welcome. Areas of interest include but are not limited to:Design synthesis characterization and evaluation of forefront and emerging materialsUnderstanding structure property performance relationships and their underlying mechanismsDevelopment of materials for energy environmental biomedical electronic and catalytic applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信