Changes in plant litter and root carbon inputs alter soil respiration in three different forests of a climate transitional region

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Jiayin Feng , Chunyu Wang , Jingjing Gao , Huixia Ma , Zheng Li , Yuanfeng Hao , Xueli Qiu , Jingyi Ru , Jian Song , Shiqiang Wan
{"title":"Changes in plant litter and root carbon inputs alter soil respiration in three different forests of a climate transitional region","authors":"Jiayin Feng ,&nbsp;Chunyu Wang ,&nbsp;Jingjing Gao ,&nbsp;Huixia Ma ,&nbsp;Zheng Li ,&nbsp;Yuanfeng Hao ,&nbsp;Xueli Qiu ,&nbsp;Jingyi Ru ,&nbsp;Jian Song ,&nbsp;Shiqiang Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Both plant litter and roots are major sources of soil carbon (C) pools, however, the relative contributions of these two C input pathways to soil respiration, especially in different forest types, are largely unexplored, leading to a great uncertainty in estimating soil C sinks. As part of a field experiment with five-year (2016–2020) C input manipulations in three forests all between the subtropical and warm temperate region, this study was conducted to explore the responses of soil respiration to litter addition, litter removal, and root exclusion in a coniferous forest, a broadleaved forest, and a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our results showed that litter addition enhanced soil respiration by 9.57 %, 15.5 %, and 24.5 % in the coniferous, broadleaved, and mixed forests, whereas litter removal decreased it by 4.06 % and 8.30 % in the coniferous and broadleaved forests across the five years due to the changes in soil microclimate and litter-derived C sources as well as a potential priming effect in the soil. Root exclusion reduced soil respiration in all the three forests, but its effect did not differ with that of litter removal, primarily attributing to the indistinctive deviation between these two C input pathways on soil microbial biomass. The influences of different C inputs on soil respiration varied with forest types, with interactions of root exclusion with litter manipulations occurring in the coniferous and broadleaved forests but additive effects of those in the mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our findings indicate different responses of soil respiration to plant litter and root manipulations in diverse forests, and imply that rational regulating of plant-derived C inputs can help to reduce soil C loss under climate change scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"358 ","pages":"Article 110212"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324003253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both plant litter and roots are major sources of soil carbon (C) pools, however, the relative contributions of these two C input pathways to soil respiration, especially in different forest types, are largely unexplored, leading to a great uncertainty in estimating soil C sinks. As part of a field experiment with five-year (2016–2020) C input manipulations in three forests all between the subtropical and warm temperate region, this study was conducted to explore the responses of soil respiration to litter addition, litter removal, and root exclusion in a coniferous forest, a broadleaved forest, and a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our results showed that litter addition enhanced soil respiration by 9.57 %, 15.5 %, and 24.5 % in the coniferous, broadleaved, and mixed forests, whereas litter removal decreased it by 4.06 % and 8.30 % in the coniferous and broadleaved forests across the five years due to the changes in soil microclimate and litter-derived C sources as well as a potential priming effect in the soil. Root exclusion reduced soil respiration in all the three forests, but its effect did not differ with that of litter removal, primarily attributing to the indistinctive deviation between these two C input pathways on soil microbial biomass. The influences of different C inputs on soil respiration varied with forest types, with interactions of root exclusion with litter manipulations occurring in the coniferous and broadleaved forests but additive effects of those in the mixed broadleaf-conifer forest. Our findings indicate different responses of soil respiration to plant litter and root manipulations in diverse forests, and imply that rational regulating of plant-derived C inputs can help to reduce soil C loss under climate change scenarios.

植物枯落物和根系碳输入量的变化改变了气候过渡区三种不同森林的土壤呼吸作用
植物枯落物和根系都是土壤碳(C)池的主要来源,然而,这两种碳输入途径对土壤呼吸的相对贡献,尤其是在不同森林类型中的贡献,在很大程度上尚未得到探索,导致在估算土壤碳汇方面存在很大的不确定性。本研究是在亚热带和暖温带地区的三片森林中进行的为期五年(2016-2020 年)的碳输入操纵野外实验的一部分,旨在探索针叶林、阔叶林和阔叶-针叶混交林中的土壤呼吸对枯落物添加、枯落物去除和根系排除的响应。我们的研究结果表明,在针叶林、阔叶林和混交林中,增加枯落物分别提高了土壤呼吸作用的 9.57 %、15.5 % 和 24.5 %,而在针叶林和阔叶林中,去除枯落物则使土壤呼吸作用在五年内分别降低了 4.06 % 和 8.30 %,原因是土壤小气候和枯落物衍生的碳源发生了变化,以及土壤中潜在的引物效应。根系排斥降低了所有三种森林的土壤呼吸作用,但其效果与清除枯落物的效果并无差异,这主要是由于这两种碳输入途径对土壤微生物生物量的影响存在不明显的偏差。不同的碳输入对土壤呼吸的影响因森林类型而异,在针叶林和阔叶林中,根系排斥与枯落物处理之间存在相互作用,但在阔叶-针叶混交林中,根系排斥与枯落物处理之间存在相加效应。我们的研究结果表明,在不同的森林中,土壤呼吸对植物枯落物和根系操作的反应不同,这意味着合理调节植物源碳输入有助于减少气候变化情景下的土壤碳损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信