Ensiling sugar beets: Effect of mixer feed used for co-ensiling on fermentation products and losses when ensiled in vacuum bags

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Emma Marie Vallentin Hvas , Mogens Larsen , Lars Andersen , Ulrike Bedenk , Martin Riis Weisbjerg
{"title":"Ensiling sugar beets: Effect of mixer feed used for co-ensiling on fermentation products and losses when ensiled in vacuum bags","authors":"Emma Marie Vallentin Hvas ,&nbsp;Mogens Larsen ,&nbsp;Lars Andersen ,&nbsp;Ulrike Bedenk ,&nbsp;Martin Riis Weisbjerg","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-ensiling beets with other feeds allows for year-round feeding of beets and reduces the risk of dry matter (DM) loss as effluent from the silage. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of co-ensiling high DM beets with maize and grass/clover silage, grass seed straw, fresh beet pulp, and high DM concentrates (dried beet pulp, wheat distillers’ grain solubles; DDGS, wheat bran, rapeseed meal, sunflower meal, soybean hulls, and maize gluten feed) on gaseous weight loss (GWL), loss of effluents, and silage quality. Beets from harvest year 2021 were used to produce two sets of silages in laboratory silos, resulting in a total of 2 pure beet silages and 12 mixed beets silages. GWL was measured by weighing the laboratory silos until 181 days of ensiling. Fermentation was terminated by freezing after 30, 92, and 181 days of ensiling where loss of effluent was also measured. Total GWL was highest in the two pure beet silages (mean ± SEM; 282 ± 5.47 and 250 ± 7.94 g/kg DM, respectively), and differed among the mixed silages depending on mixer feed. Effluent was only observed in the pure beet silage in Set 1. Silage DM content at 181 days of ensiling was lowest for the two pure beet silages (180 ± 10.9 and 165 ± 5.95 g/kg). For all silages, pH was below 4.25 by 30 days of ensiling. Ethanol concentrations at 181 days of ensiling were highest in the two pure beet silages (345 ± 11.5 and 287 ± 11.8 g/kg DM). L-lactate content of pure beet silages was 38.4 ± 1.85 and 31.1 ± 1.21 g/kg DM at 181 days of ensiling. In Set 1, L-lactate content was lower in beets ensiled with maize silage, grass seed straw, dried beet pulp, or DDGS compared to pure beet silage. In Set 2, L-lactate content was higher in beets ensiled with maize gluten feed compared to pure beet silage. Silage concentration of NH<sub>3</sub> varied depending on mixer feed. The NH<sub>3</sub> content at 181 days of ensiling was 0.817 ± 0.626 and 2.05 ± 0.601 g/kg DM for pure beet silages and was highest in beets ensiled with grass/clover silage in both silage sets (16.4 ± 0.63 and 17.6 ± 0.60 g/kg DM). Co-ensiling beets with forages, high DM concentrates, and protein-rich feeds included in this study lowered fermentation weight loss, eliminated the loss of effluent, and resulted in silages of good fermentation quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"318 ","pages":"Article 116101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124002293/pdfft?md5=4bfa674a0e392bb55c1b5b3c2475835c&pid=1-s2.0-S0377840124002293-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124002293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-ensiling beets with other feeds allows for year-round feeding of beets and reduces the risk of dry matter (DM) loss as effluent from the silage. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of co-ensiling high DM beets with maize and grass/clover silage, grass seed straw, fresh beet pulp, and high DM concentrates (dried beet pulp, wheat distillers’ grain solubles; DDGS, wheat bran, rapeseed meal, sunflower meal, soybean hulls, and maize gluten feed) on gaseous weight loss (GWL), loss of effluents, and silage quality. Beets from harvest year 2021 were used to produce two sets of silages in laboratory silos, resulting in a total of 2 pure beet silages and 12 mixed beets silages. GWL was measured by weighing the laboratory silos until 181 days of ensiling. Fermentation was terminated by freezing after 30, 92, and 181 days of ensiling where loss of effluent was also measured. Total GWL was highest in the two pure beet silages (mean ± SEM; 282 ± 5.47 and 250 ± 7.94 g/kg DM, respectively), and differed among the mixed silages depending on mixer feed. Effluent was only observed in the pure beet silage in Set 1. Silage DM content at 181 days of ensiling was lowest for the two pure beet silages (180 ± 10.9 and 165 ± 5.95 g/kg). For all silages, pH was below 4.25 by 30 days of ensiling. Ethanol concentrations at 181 days of ensiling were highest in the two pure beet silages (345 ± 11.5 and 287 ± 11.8 g/kg DM). L-lactate content of pure beet silages was 38.4 ± 1.85 and 31.1 ± 1.21 g/kg DM at 181 days of ensiling. In Set 1, L-lactate content was lower in beets ensiled with maize silage, grass seed straw, dried beet pulp, or DDGS compared to pure beet silage. In Set 2, L-lactate content was higher in beets ensiled with maize gluten feed compared to pure beet silage. Silage concentration of NH3 varied depending on mixer feed. The NH3 content at 181 days of ensiling was 0.817 ± 0.626 and 2.05 ± 0.601 g/kg DM for pure beet silages and was highest in beets ensiled with grass/clover silage in both silage sets (16.4 ± 0.63 and 17.6 ± 0.60 g/kg DM). Co-ensiling beets with forages, high DM concentrates, and protein-rich feeds included in this study lowered fermentation weight loss, eliminated the loss of effluent, and resulted in silages of good fermentation quality.

饲喂甜菜:在真空袋中酿造甜菜时,用于共同酿造的混合饲料对发酵产物和损失的影响
将甜菜与其他饲料混合饲喂可实现全年饲喂甜菜,并降低干物质(DM)从青贮饲料中流失的风险。本研究旨在评估高DM甜菜与玉米和青草/苜蓿青贮饲料、草籽秸秆、新鲜甜菜浆和高DM精料(干甜菜浆、小麦蒸馏谷物溶质、DDGS、麦麸、菜籽粕、葵花籽粕、大豆皮和玉米麸质饲料)混合青贮对气体失重(GWL)、流出物损失和青贮质量的影响。2021 年收获的甜菜被用来在实验室筒仓中生产两套青贮饲料,共生产出 2 套纯甜菜青贮饲料和 12 套混合甜菜青贮饲料。通过称量实验室青贮窖的重量来测量 GWL,直至青贮 181 天。在贮藏 30 天、92 天和 181 天后,通过冷冻终止发酵,并测量流出物的损失。两种纯甜菜青贮饲料的总 GWL 最高(平均值 ± SEM;分别为 282 ± 5.47 克/千克 DM 和 250 ± 7.94 克/千克 DM),混合青贮饲料的总 GWL 则因混合饲料而异。只有在第 1 组的纯甜菜青贮中观察到流出物。青贮 181 天时,两种纯甜菜青贮的 DM 含量最低(180 ± 10.9 和 165 ± 5.95 克/千克)。所有青贮饲料在贮藏 30 天时 pH 值均低于 4.25。两种纯甜菜青贮饲料在贮藏 181 天时乙醇浓度最高(345 ± 11.5 和 287 ± 11.8 克/千克 DM)。在贮藏 181 天时,纯甜菜青贮饲料中的 L-乳酸含量分别为 38.4 ± 1.85 和 31.1 ± 1.21 克/千克 DM。在试验组 1 中,与纯甜菜青贮相比,与玉米青贮、草籽秸秆、干甜菜浆或 DDGS 一起青贮的甜菜中 L-乳酸含量较低。在第二组中,与纯甜菜青贮相比,用玉米麸饲料腌制的甜菜中 L-乳酸盐含量更高。青贮饲料中的 NH3 浓度随混合饲料的不同而变化。在青贮 181 天时,纯甜菜青贮饲料的 NH3 含量分别为 0.817 ± 0.626 和 2.05 ± 0.601 g/kg DM,而在两组青贮饲料中,与青草/苜蓿青贮饲料一起青贮的甜菜的 NH3 含量最高(16.4 ± 0.63 和 17.6 ± 0.60 g/kg DM)。在本研究中,甜菜与饲草、高 DM 精料和富含蛋白质的饲料共同青贮可降低发酵失重,消除流出物的损失,并获得发酵质量良好的青贮饲料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信