Plebeian B Medina, Subasri Armon, Mohammad Firdaus Bin Abdul Aziz, Io Hong Cheong, Marian P de Leon, Sonia Drobysz, Muhd Haziq Fikry Bin Haji Abdul Momin, Debra Leiolani Garcia, Diah Iskandriati, Zisis Kozlakidis, Lin Cui, Seanghorn Mao, Mary Elizabeth Miranda, Khin Mar Mya, Lingeswran Nallenthiran, Marie Christine Obusan, Kongchay Phimmakong, Phyu Sabai, Channada Saejung, Hans Prakash Sathasivam, Faizatul Lela Binti Jafar, Rodel Jonathan S Vitor, Ailyn M Yabes, Alan B Calaor, Viji Vijayan, Raymond T P Lin
{"title":"A Review of Regulatory Frameworks for Biobanking in Southeast Asia.","authors":"Plebeian B Medina, Subasri Armon, Mohammad Firdaus Bin Abdul Aziz, Io Hong Cheong, Marian P de Leon, Sonia Drobysz, Muhd Haziq Fikry Bin Haji Abdul Momin, Debra Leiolani Garcia, Diah Iskandriati, Zisis Kozlakidis, Lin Cui, Seanghorn Mao, Mary Elizabeth Miranda, Khin Mar Mya, Lingeswran Nallenthiran, Marie Christine Obusan, Kongchay Phimmakong, Phyu Sabai, Channada Saejung, Hans Prakash Sathasivam, Faizatul Lela Binti Jafar, Rodel Jonathan S Vitor, Ailyn M Yabes, Alan B Calaor, Viji Vijayan, Raymond T P Lin","doi":"10.1089/bio.2024.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Southeast Asian countries are at the forefront of public health pressures due to a confluence of factors such as population growth, urbanization, environmental pollution, and infectious diseases (re)emergence. Therefore, the ability to be able to conduct research addressing local and regional needs is of paramount importance. As such, biobanking activities, the standardized collection of biological samples, and associated data, developed over the past few decades supporting ongoing biomedical and clinical research, as well as surveillance are of critical importance. However, the regulatory landscape of biobanking is not widely understood and reported, which this narrative review aims to address for the ASEAN member states. It is evident that there are specific regulatory arrangements within each ASEAN member state, which though may be sufficient for the current level of operations, are unlikely to support a regional sharing of biological samples, data, and eventually benefits from the conducted research. Additionally, legacy and often-overlapping regulatory frameworks exist, which raise the need of an eventual consolidation under a single framework. Thus, this field requires further study as well as the creation of viable, practical proposals that would allow for biobanking harmonization and thus the exchange of biological samples and data to be achieved regionally, if not further afield.</p>","PeriodicalId":55358,"journal":{"name":"Biopreservation and Biobanking","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biopreservation and Biobanking","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2024.0044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Southeast Asian countries are at the forefront of public health pressures due to a confluence of factors such as population growth, urbanization, environmental pollution, and infectious diseases (re)emergence. Therefore, the ability to be able to conduct research addressing local and regional needs is of paramount importance. As such, biobanking activities, the standardized collection of biological samples, and associated data, developed over the past few decades supporting ongoing biomedical and clinical research, as well as surveillance are of critical importance. However, the regulatory landscape of biobanking is not widely understood and reported, which this narrative review aims to address for the ASEAN member states. It is evident that there are specific regulatory arrangements within each ASEAN member state, which though may be sufficient for the current level of operations, are unlikely to support a regional sharing of biological samples, data, and eventually benefits from the conducted research. Additionally, legacy and often-overlapping regulatory frameworks exist, which raise the need of an eventual consolidation under a single framework. Thus, this field requires further study as well as the creation of viable, practical proposals that would allow for biobanking harmonization and thus the exchange of biological samples and data to be achieved regionally, if not further afield.
Biopreservation and BiobankingBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
期刊介绍:
Biopreservation and Biobanking is the first journal to provide a unifying forum for the peer-reviewed communication of recent advances in the emerging and evolving field of biospecimen procurement, processing, preservation and banking, distribution, and use. The Journal publishes a range of original articles focusing on current challenges and problems in biopreservation, and advances in methods to address these issues related to the processing of macromolecules, cells, and tissues for research.
In a new section dedicated to Emerging Markets and Technologies, the Journal highlights the emergence of new markets and technologies that are either adopting or disrupting the biobank framework as they imprint on society. The solutions presented here are anticipated to help drive innovation within the biobank community.
Biopreservation and Biobanking also explores the ethical, legal, and societal considerations surrounding biobanking and biorepository operation. Ideas and practical solutions relevant to improved quality, efficiency, and sustainability of repositories, and relating to their management, operation and oversight are discussed as well.