Effectiveness of the Stroke e-Learning Module on Malaysian Doctors' Knowledge of Acute Ischaemic Stroke Management.

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.16
Stephenie Ann Albart, Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof Khan, Aneesa Abdul Rashid, Wan Asyraf Wan Zaidi, Irene Looi, Fan Kee Hoo
{"title":"Effectiveness of the Stroke e-Learning Module on Malaysian Doctors' Knowledge of Acute Ischaemic Stroke Management.","authors":"Stephenie Ann Albart, Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof Khan, Aneesa Abdul Rashid, Wan Asyraf Wan Zaidi, Irene Looi, Fan Kee Hoo","doi":"10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Stroke e-Learning Module (SEM) is a nationwide initiative to improve stroke care in Malaysia. This study aimed to assess the module's effectiveness in improving knowledge on acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) management among Malaysian doctors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pre-post study design. Medical officers, specialists and general practitioners from various disciplines who work in healthcare facilities in Malaysia were recruited virtually from those who registered for the SEM on the Docquity platform between 1 February 2021 and 31 January 2022. The Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire (ASMaQ), an existing validated questionnaire, was used to measure the doctors' knowledge of AIS management before and after the SEM. The ASMaQ had three domains: i) general stroke knowledge (GSK), ii) hyperacute stroke management (HSM) and iii) advanced stroke management (ASM). The paired <i>t-</i> and the McNemar-tests were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and seventy-one participants voluntarily responded to the pre- and post-module questionnaires. The paired <i>t-</i>test revealed statistically significant improvement for the ASM knowledge scores (mean difference = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.8, 3.2; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The baseline proportion of participants with good knowledge of GSK, HSM and ASM were 92.4%, 64.9%, and 76%, respectively. The McNemar test showed that approximately 14% of the participants had significant improvement in ASM knowledge (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, no significant changes were noted for GSK (-0.6%) and HSM (4.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SEM has been shown to increase Malaysian doctors' knowledge on ASM. However, greater effort should be made to improve GSK and HSM knowledge, particularly in areas related to stroke thrombolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":47388,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Stroke e-Learning Module (SEM) is a nationwide initiative to improve stroke care in Malaysia. This study aimed to assess the module's effectiveness in improving knowledge on acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) management among Malaysian doctors.

Methods: This was a pre-post study design. Medical officers, specialists and general practitioners from various disciplines who work in healthcare facilities in Malaysia were recruited virtually from those who registered for the SEM on the Docquity platform between 1 February 2021 and 31 January 2022. The Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire (ASMaQ), an existing validated questionnaire, was used to measure the doctors' knowledge of AIS management before and after the SEM. The ASMaQ had three domains: i) general stroke knowledge (GSK), ii) hyperacute stroke management (HSM) and iii) advanced stroke management (ASM). The paired t- and the McNemar-tests were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the module.

Results: One hundred and seventy-one participants voluntarily responded to the pre- and post-module questionnaires. The paired t-test revealed statistically significant improvement for the ASM knowledge scores (mean difference = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.8, 3.2; P < 0.001). The baseline proportion of participants with good knowledge of GSK, HSM and ASM were 92.4%, 64.9%, and 76%, respectively. The McNemar test showed that approximately 14% of the participants had significant improvement in ASM knowledge (P < 0.001). However, no significant changes were noted for GSK (-0.6%) and HSM (4.1%).

Conclusion: The SEM has been shown to increase Malaysian doctors' knowledge on ASM. However, greater effort should be made to improve GSK and HSM knowledge, particularly in areas related to stroke thrombolysis.

中风电子学习模块对马来西亚医生掌握急性缺血性中风管理知识的效果。
背景:中风电子学习模块(SEM)是一项旨在改善马来西亚中风护理的全国性计划。本研究旨在评估该模块在提高马来西亚医生急性缺血性中风(AIS)管理知识方面的有效性:方法:这是一项前-后研究设计。从 2021 年 2 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 31 日期间在 Docquity 平台注册 SEM 的人员中虚拟招募了在马来西亚医疗机构工作的不同学科的医务人员、专科医生和全科医生。急性中风管理问卷(ASMaQ)是一份现有的经过验证的问卷,用于测量医生在 SEM 前后对急性中风管理知识的掌握情况。ASMaQ 包括三个方面:i) 一般卒中知识 (GSK),ii) 超急性卒中管理 (HSM) 和 iii) 高级卒中管理 (ASM)。采用配对 t 检验和 McNemar 检验来评估模块的有效性:结果:171 名参与者自愿回答了模块前后的问卷。配对 t 检验显示,ASM 知识得分有了显著提高(平均差异 = 2.5;95% CI:1.8,3.2;P <0.001)。对 GSK、HSM 和 ASM 有良好了解的参与者基线比例分别为 92.4%、64.9% 和 76%。McNemar 检验显示,约有 14% 的参与者在 ASM 知识方面有显著提高(P < 0.001)。然而,GSK(-0.6%)和 HSM(4.1%)没有明显变化:SEM已被证明能增加马来西亚医生的ASM知识。结论:事实表明,SEM 提高了马来西亚医生对 ASM 的认识,但应加大力度提高 GSK 和 HSM 的认识,尤其是在与中风溶栓相关的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, fully online journal that is published at least six times a year. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of medical sciences including biomedical, allied health, clinical and social sciences. We accept high quality papers from basic to translational research especially from low & middle income countries, as classified by the United Nations & World Bank (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/ articles/906519), with the aim that published research will benefit back the bottom billion population from these countries. Manuscripts submitted from developed or high income countries to MJMS must contain data and information that will benefit the socio-health and bio-medical sciences of these low and middle income countries. The MJMS editorial board consists of internationally regarded clinicians and scientists from low and middle income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信