Electroacupuncture combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is beneficial for the expulsion of ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized trial.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Heng Zhang, Lihua Li, Weizheng Li, Wei Wei, Tianyu Bai, Qiang Wei, Yongliang Ni
{"title":"Electroacupuncture combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is beneficial for the expulsion of ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized trial.","authors":"Heng Zhang, Lihua Li, Weizheng Li, Wei Wei, Tianyu Bai, Qiang Wei, Yongliang Ni","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05226-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in treating ureteral calculi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled trial included 207 patients with ureteral calculi who were randomly allocated to an experimental group that underwent EA plus ESWL (n = 95) and a control group that underwent only ESWL (n = 112). Imaging examinations were performed at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after the operation, followed by comparing the stone-clearance rate, time to first stone expulsion, and incidence of major complications between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stone-clearance rates at 1 (59.1 vs. 37%, P = 0.002), 2 (86.4 vs. 59.3%, P = 0.000), and 4 (90.9 vs. 77.8%, P = 0.013) weeks after the operation in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The time to first stone expulsion in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.29 ± 1.55 vs. 2.45 ± 3.11 days, respectively; P = 0.001). However, we found no difference in the incidence of major complications between the two groups (15.9 vs. 17.6%, P = 0.754).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EA-assisted ESWL significantly improved stone clearance and shortened the time to stone expulsion without elevating the complication risk. However, a large-scale multicenter, prospective study is required to corroborate our conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05226-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in treating ureteral calculi.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial included 207 patients with ureteral calculi who were randomly allocated to an experimental group that underwent EA plus ESWL (n = 95) and a control group that underwent only ESWL (n = 112). Imaging examinations were performed at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after the operation, followed by comparing the stone-clearance rate, time to first stone expulsion, and incidence of major complications between the two groups.

Results: The stone-clearance rates at 1 (59.1 vs. 37%, P = 0.002), 2 (86.4 vs. 59.3%, P = 0.000), and 4 (90.9 vs. 77.8%, P = 0.013) weeks after the operation in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The time to first stone expulsion in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.29 ± 1.55 vs. 2.45 ± 3.11 days, respectively; P = 0.001). However, we found no difference in the incidence of major complications between the two groups (15.9 vs. 17.6%, P = 0.754).

Conclusion: EA-assisted ESWL significantly improved stone clearance and shortened the time to stone expulsion without elevating the complication risk. However, a large-scale multicenter, prospective study is required to corroborate our conclusions.

Abstract Image

电针联合体外冲击波碎石有利于排出输尿管结石:一项前瞻性随机试验。
目的:评估电针(EA)联合体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗输尿管结石的疗效和安全性:这项前瞻性随机对照试验包括207名输尿管结石患者,他们被随机分配到实验组(95人)和对照组(112人),实验组接受电针联合体外冲击波碎石治疗,对照组仅接受体外冲击波碎石治疗。术后1周、2周和4周进行造影检查,然后比较两组的结石清除率、首次排石时间和主要并发症的发生率:结果:实验组术后 1 周(59.1% 对 37%,P=0.002)、2 周(86.4% 对 59.3%,P=0.000)和 4 周(90.9% 对 77.8%,P=0.013)的结石清除率明显高于对照组。实验组首次排石时间明显低于对照组(分别为 1.29 ± 1.55 天 vs 2.45 ± 3.11 天;P = 0.001)。然而,我们发现两组的主要并发症发生率没有差异(15.9% vs. 17.6%,P = 0.754):结论:EA 辅助 ESWL 能显著提高结石清除率,缩短排石时间,但不会增加并发症风险。结论:EA辅助ESWL可明显提高结石清除率,缩短排石时间,且不会增加并发症风险。然而,要证实我们的结论,还需要进行大规模的多中心前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信