[Using diagnosis-related groups in Chile: lessons and challengesLições e desafios do uso de grupos de diagnósticos relacionados no Chile].

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Camilo Cid, Nancy Dawson, Camila Medina, Augusto Espinoza, Gabriel Bastías
{"title":"[Using diagnosis-related groups in Chile: lessons and challengesLições e desafios do uso de grupos de diagnósticos relacionados no Chile].","authors":"Camilo Cid, Nancy Dawson, Camila Medina, Augusto Espinoza, Gabriel Bastías","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2024.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyze the implementation of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) in Chile with a view to optimizing the distribution of public resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A chronological narrative analysis of the main milestones was complemented by simulated application of DRGs through emulated competition and cluster analysis for evaluative purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2001, DRGs were introduced in Chile in an academic context. The National Health Fund (FONASA) began using DRGs in the private sector. A public sector pilot was launched in 2015. After nearly two decades of progress, in 2020 FONASA established the DRG program as a payment mechanism for public hospitals. However, the COVID-19 pandemic slowed its development. In 2022, implementation was resumed. After evaluating the program, it was evident that the hospital clusters that had been predefined for differentiated payment did not successfully differentiate homogeneous groups. In 2023, the program was reformed, financing was increased, a single cluster and base rate were defined, and greater hospital complexity was recognized, compared to previous years. Three hospitals were added to the program, for a total of 68.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This experience shows that it is possible to sustain a public health financing policy that achieves greater efficiency and equity in the health system, based on the existence of robust institutions that continuously develop and improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 ","pages":"e67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.67","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Analyze the implementation of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) in Chile with a view to optimizing the distribution of public resources.

Methods: A chronological narrative analysis of the main milestones was complemented by simulated application of DRGs through emulated competition and cluster analysis for evaluative purposes.

Results: In 2001, DRGs were introduced in Chile in an academic context. The National Health Fund (FONASA) began using DRGs in the private sector. A public sector pilot was launched in 2015. After nearly two decades of progress, in 2020 FONASA established the DRG program as a payment mechanism for public hospitals. However, the COVID-19 pandemic slowed its development. In 2022, implementation was resumed. After evaluating the program, it was evident that the hospital clusters that had been predefined for differentiated payment did not successfully differentiate homogeneous groups. In 2023, the program was reformed, financing was increased, a single cluster and base rate were defined, and greater hospital complexity was recognized, compared to previous years. Three hospitals were added to the program, for a total of 68.

Conclusions: This experience shows that it is possible to sustain a public health financing policy that achieves greater efficiency and equity in the health system, based on the existence of robust institutions that continuously develop and improve.

[在智利使用与诊断有关的分组:经验教训和挑战在智利使用与诊断有关的分组的经验教训和挑战]。
目的分析智利实施诊断相关分组(DRGs)的情况,以期优化公共资源的分配:方法:按时间顺序对主要里程碑进行叙述性分析,并通过模拟竞争和聚类分析对 DRGs 的模拟应用进行评估:2001 年,智利在学术界引入了 DRGs。国家卫生基金(FONASA)开始在私营部门使用 DRGs。2015 年启动了公共部门试点。经过近二十年的发展,2020 年,FONASA 将 DRGs 计划确立为公立医院的支付机制。然而,COVID-19 大流行导致其发展缓慢。2022 年,该计划恢复实施。对该计划进行评估后发现,为区别支付而预先确定的医院群组并未成功区分同质群体。2023 年,该计划进行了改革,增加了资金投入,确定了单一分组和基准费率,并认识到与前几年相比,医院的复杂性更高。该计划增加了三家医院,总计 68.结论:这一经验表明,公共卫生融资政策是可以持续的,它能在卫生系统中实现更高的效率和公平性,其基础是存在不断发展和完善的健全机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信