Development of whitening mouth rinses formulated with mushroom residues and their effect on enamel's physical properties.

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.5395/rde.2024.49.e27
Julliana Andrade da Silva, Dayse Alexia de Carvalho de Brito, Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima, Juliano Lemos Bicas, Gislaine Ricci Leonardi
{"title":"Development of whitening mouth rinses formulated with mushroom residues and their effect on enamel's physical properties.","authors":"Julliana Andrade da Silva, Dayse Alexia de Carvalho de Brito, Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima, Juliano Lemos Bicas, Gislaine Ricci Leonardi","doi":"10.5395/rde.2024.49.e27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop whitening mouth rinses formulated with industrial mushrooms and compare them with over-the-counter whitening mouth rinses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Formulations with black shimeji mushrooms, mushroom substrates, and mushroom stalks were developed. Bovine enamel/dentin samples were divided into 7 groups (<i>n</i> = 10): Colgate Luminous White, Listerine Whitening Extreme (LWE), Listerine Cool Mint (LC), mushroom extract rinse (MEC), mushroom substrate rinse (MSB), mushroom stalk rinse (MTC), and artificial saliva. Samples were stained with black tea for 6 days, and then were immersed in 100 mL of each mouth rinse twice daily for 14 days. Color parameters (CIELAB [ΔE*], CIEDE2000 [ΔE<sub>00</sub>], whiteness index for dentistry [ΔWI<sub>D</sub>]) and microhardness (Knoop hardness number [KHN]) were analyzed at T<sub>1</sub> (initial), T<sub>2</sub> (24 hours), and T<sub>3</sub> (7 days). Mouth rinse pH was measured, and enamel was examined using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using generalized linear models, and KHN with the generalized linear mixed model for repeated measures (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ΔE* was higher in LW and MSB groups. No significant differences were found for ΔE<sub>00</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.0982) and ΔWI<sub>D</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.2536). Experimental mouth rinses did not promote enamel whitening based on ΔE<sub>00</sub> and ΔWI<sub>D</sub>. LWE and LC reduced KHN and had a more acidic pH, while MEC had higher KHN at T2. MEC, MSB, and MTC had alkaline pH, not altering the tooth surface.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black shimeji mushrooms are promising for mouth rinse development due to their alkaline pH and non-altering effect on surface microhardness.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop whitening mouth rinses formulated with industrial mushrooms and compare them with over-the-counter whitening mouth rinses.

Materials and methods: Formulations with black shimeji mushrooms, mushroom substrates, and mushroom stalks were developed. Bovine enamel/dentin samples were divided into 7 groups (n = 10): Colgate Luminous White, Listerine Whitening Extreme (LWE), Listerine Cool Mint (LC), mushroom extract rinse (MEC), mushroom substrate rinse (MSB), mushroom stalk rinse (MTC), and artificial saliva. Samples were stained with black tea for 6 days, and then were immersed in 100 mL of each mouth rinse twice daily for 14 days. Color parameters (CIELAB [ΔE*], CIEDE2000 [ΔE00], whiteness index for dentistry [ΔWID]) and microhardness (Knoop hardness number [KHN]) were analyzed at T1 (initial), T2 (24 hours), and T3 (7 days). Mouth rinse pH was measured, and enamel was examined using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using generalized linear models, and KHN with the generalized linear mixed model for repeated measures (p ≤ 0.05).

Results: ΔE* was higher in LW and MSB groups. No significant differences were found for ΔE00 (p = 0.0982) and ΔWID (p = 0.2536). Experimental mouth rinses did not promote enamel whitening based on ΔE00 and ΔWID. LWE and LC reduced KHN and had a more acidic pH, while MEC had higher KHN at T2. MEC, MSB, and MTC had alkaline pH, not altering the tooth surface.

Conclusions: Black shimeji mushrooms are promising for mouth rinse development due to their alkaline pH and non-altering effect on surface microhardness.

用蘑菇渣配制的美白漱口水的开发及其对珐琅质物理特性的影响。
研究目的本研究旨在开发用工业蘑菇配制的美白漱口水,并将其与非处方药美白漱口水进行比较:材料和方法:使用黑姬菇、蘑菇基质和蘑菇柄开发配方。牛珐琅质/牙本质样本分为 7 组(n = 10):高露洁亮白、李施德林极致美白(LWE)、李施德林清凉薄荷(LC)、蘑菇提取物冲洗剂(MEC)、蘑菇基质冲洗剂(MSB)、蘑菇柄冲洗剂(MTC)和人工唾液。样品用红茶染色 6 天,然后浸泡在每种漱口水 100 毫升中,每天两次,持续 14 天。分别在 T1(初始)、T2(24 小时)和 T3(7 天)分析颜色参数(CIELAB [ΔE*]、CIEDE2000 [ΔE00]、牙科白度指数 [ΔWID])和显微硬度(努氏硬度数 [KHN])。测量漱口水的 pH 值,并使用扫描电子显微镜检查牙釉质。数据采用广义线性模型进行分析,KHN采用广义线性混合模型进行重复测量(P≤0.05)。ΔE00(p = 0.0982)和ΔWID(p = 0.2536)无明显差异。根据ΔE00 和 ΔWID,实验性漱口水并不能促进珐琅质美白。LWE和LC降低了KHN,pH值更酸,而MEC在T2时的KHN更高。MEC、MSB和MTC的pH值呈碱性,不会改变牙齿表面:由于黑蘑菇的 pH 值呈碱性,且不会改变牙齿表面的微硬度,因此有望用于开发漱口水。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信