Perception of emotional facial expressions in aggression and psychopathy.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Timo Stein, Nina Gehrer, Aiste Jusyte, Jonathan Scheeff, Michael Schönenberg
{"title":"Perception of emotional facial expressions in aggression and psychopathy.","authors":"Timo Stein, Nina Gehrer, Aiste Jusyte, Jonathan Scheeff, Michael Schönenberg","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724001417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Altered affective state recognition is assumed to be a root cause of aggressive behavior, a hallmark of psychopathologies such as psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. However, the two most influential models make markedly different predictions regarding the underlying mechanism. According to the integrated emotion system theory (IES), aggression reflects impaired processing of social distress cues such as fearful faces. In contrast, the hostile attribution bias (HAB) model explains aggression with a bias to interpret ambiguous expressions as angry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a set of four experiments, we measured processing of fearful and angry facial expressions (compared to neutral and other expressions) in a sample of 65 male imprisoned violent offenders rated using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R, Hare, R. D. (1991). <i>The psychopathy checklist-revised</i>. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems) and in 60 age-matched control participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no evidence for a fear deficit in violent offenders or for an association of psychopathy or aggression with impaired processing of fearful faces. Similarly, there was no evidence for a perceptual bias for angry faces linked to psychopathy or aggression. However, using highly ambiguous stimuli and requiring explicit labeling of emotions, violent offenders showed a categorization bias for anger and this anger bias correlated with self-reported trait aggression (but not with psychopathy).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results add to a growing literature casting doubt on the notion that fear processing is impaired in aggressive individuals and in psychopathy and provide support for the idea that aggression is related to a hostile attribution bias that emerges from later cognitive, post-perceptual processing stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724001417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Altered affective state recognition is assumed to be a root cause of aggressive behavior, a hallmark of psychopathologies such as psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. However, the two most influential models make markedly different predictions regarding the underlying mechanism. According to the integrated emotion system theory (IES), aggression reflects impaired processing of social distress cues such as fearful faces. In contrast, the hostile attribution bias (HAB) model explains aggression with a bias to interpret ambiguous expressions as angry.

Methods: In a set of four experiments, we measured processing of fearful and angry facial expressions (compared to neutral and other expressions) in a sample of 65 male imprisoned violent offenders rated using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R, Hare, R. D. (1991). The psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems) and in 60 age-matched control participants.

Results: There was no evidence for a fear deficit in violent offenders or for an association of psychopathy or aggression with impaired processing of fearful faces. Similarly, there was no evidence for a perceptual bias for angry faces linked to psychopathy or aggression. However, using highly ambiguous stimuli and requiring explicit labeling of emotions, violent offenders showed a categorization bias for anger and this anger bias correlated with self-reported trait aggression (but not with psychopathy).

Conclusions: These results add to a growing literature casting doubt on the notion that fear processing is impaired in aggressive individuals and in psychopathy and provide support for the idea that aggression is related to a hostile attribution bias that emerges from later cognitive, post-perceptual processing stages.

对攻击行为和心理变态中情绪化面部表情的感知。
背景:情感状态识别的改变被认为是攻击性行为的根本原因,而攻击性行为是精神变态和反社会人格障碍等精神病理学的标志。然而,两种最有影响力的模型对其基本机制的预测却明显不同。根据综合情绪系统理论(IES),攻击行为反映了对恐惧面孔等社会痛苦线索的处理能力受损。与此相反,敌意归因偏差(HAB)模型则用将模棱两可的表情解释为愤怒的偏差来解释攻击行为:在一组共四次的实验中,我们测量了 65 名男性在押暴力犯罪者对恐惧和愤怒表情(与中性和其他表情相比)的处理过程,并使用海尔精神病态检查表-修订版(PCL-R,Hare, R. D. (1991)。精神变态检查表-修订版》。安大略省多伦多市:结果:结果:没有证据表明暴力犯罪者存在恐惧缺陷,也没有证据表明精神变态或攻击行为与恐惧面孔处理能力受损有关。同样,也没有证据表明愤怒面孔的知觉偏差与精神变态或攻击行为有关。然而,在使用高度模糊的刺激并要求明确标记情绪的情况下,暴力犯罪者表现出了对愤怒的分类偏差,而且这种愤怒偏差与自我报告的特质攻击性相关(但与心理变态无关):这些结果为越来越多的文献增添了新的内容,这些文献对攻击性个体和心理变态患者的恐惧处理能力受损这一观点提出了质疑,并为攻击性与后期认知、感知后处理阶段出现的敌对归因偏差有关这一观点提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信