Screening for depression in patients with epilepsy: same questions but different meaning to different patients.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Olayinka I Arimoro, Colin B Josephson, Matthew T James, Scott B Patten, Samuel Wiebe, Lisa M Lix, Tolulope T Sajobi
{"title":"Screening for depression in patients with epilepsy: same questions but different meaning to different patients.","authors":"Olayinka I Arimoro, Colin B Josephson, Matthew T James, Scott B Patten, Samuel Wiebe, Lisa M Lix, Tolulope T Sajobi","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03782-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy (NDDI-E), a 6-item epilepsy-specific PROM, is used to screen for major depressive disorder symptoms for patients with epilepsy (PWE). The validity and interpretation of PROMs can be affected by differential item functioning (DIF), which occurs when subgroups of patients with the same underlying health status respond to and interpret questions about their health status differently. This study aims to determine whether NDDI-E items exhibit DIF and to identify subgroups of PWE that exhibit DIF in NDDI-E items.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program database, a clinical registry of adult PWE in Calgary, Canada. A tree-based partial credit model based on recursive partitioning (PCTree) was used to identify subgroups that exhibit DIF on NDDI-E items using patients' characteristics as covariates. Differences in the identified subgroups were characterized using multinomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,576 patients in this cohort, 806 (51.1%) were female, and the median age was 38.0 years. PCTree identified four patient subgroups defined by employment status, age, and sex. Subgroup 1 were unemployed patients ≤ 26 years old, subgroup 2 were unemployed patients > 26 years, subgroup 3 were employed females, while subgroup 4 were employed male patients. The subgroups exhibited significant differences on education level, comorbidity index scores, marital status, type of epilepsy, and driving status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PWE differed in their interpretation and responses to questions about their depression symptoms, and these differences were a function of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03782-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy (NDDI-E), a 6-item epilepsy-specific PROM, is used to screen for major depressive disorder symptoms for patients with epilepsy (PWE). The validity and interpretation of PROMs can be affected by differential item functioning (DIF), which occurs when subgroups of patients with the same underlying health status respond to and interpret questions about their health status differently. This study aims to determine whether NDDI-E items exhibit DIF and to identify subgroups of PWE that exhibit DIF in NDDI-E items.

Methods: Data were from the Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program database, a clinical registry of adult PWE in Calgary, Canada. A tree-based partial credit model based on recursive partitioning (PCTree) was used to identify subgroups that exhibit DIF on NDDI-E items using patients' characteristics as covariates. Differences in the identified subgroups were characterized using multinomial logistic regression.

Results: Of the 1,576 patients in this cohort, 806 (51.1%) were female, and the median age was 38.0 years. PCTree identified four patient subgroups defined by employment status, age, and sex. Subgroup 1 were unemployed patients ≤ 26 years old, subgroup 2 were unemployed patients > 26 years, subgroup 3 were employed females, while subgroup 4 were employed male patients. The subgroups exhibited significant differences on education level, comorbidity index scores, marital status, type of epilepsy, and driving status.

Conclusion: PWE differed in their interpretation and responses to questions about their depression symptoms, and these differences were a function of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Abstract Image

癫痫患者的抑郁筛查:同样的问题对不同患者却有不同的意义。
目的:患者报告结果量表(PROMs),如神经系统疾病癫痫抑郁量表(NDDI-E),是一种 6 个项目的癫痫特异性 PROM,用于筛查癫痫患者(PWE)的重度抑郁障碍症状。差异项目功能(DIF)会影响 PROM 的有效性和解释,当具有相同基本健康状况的亚组患者对有关其健康状况的问题做出不同的反应和解释时,就会出现差异项目功能。本研究旨在确定 NDDI-E 项目是否表现出 DIF,并确定在 NDDI-E 项目中表现出 DIF 的威利斯特罗亚群:方法:数据来自卡尔加里综合癫痫项目数据库,该数据库是加拿大卡尔加里成年癫痫患者的临床登记处。使用基于递归分区(PCTree)的树型部分信用模型,以患者特征为协变量,识别出在 NDDI-E 项目中表现出 DIF 的亚组。使用多项式逻辑回归对所识别亚组的差异进行了描述:在 1576 名患者中,806 名(51.1%)为女性,中位年龄为 38.0 岁。PCTree 根据就业状况、年龄和性别确定了四个患者亚组。亚组 1 为年龄小于 26 岁的失业患者,亚组 2 为年龄大于 26 岁的失业患者,亚组 3 为就业女性,亚组 4 为就业男性患者。各分组在教育水平、合并症指数评分、婚姻状况、癫痫类型和驾驶状况方面存在显著差异:结论:残疾人对抑郁症状的解释和回答各不相同,这些差异与社会人口学和临床特征有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信