Three-dimensional assessment on digital cast of spontaneous upper first molar distorotation after Ni-ti leaf springs expander and rapid maxillary expander: A two-centre randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Andrea Abate, Alessandro Ugolini, Alessandro Bruni, Vincenzo Quinzi, Valentina Lanteri
{"title":"Three-dimensional assessment on digital cast of spontaneous upper first molar distorotation after Ni-ti leaf springs expander and rapid maxillary expander: A two-centre randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Andrea Abate, Alessandro Ugolini, Alessandro Bruni, Vincenzo Quinzi, Valentina Lanteri","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the spontaneous distorotation of upper first permanent molars and the transverse dentoalveolar changes on digital casts in growing patients following maxillary expansion treatment using either the Leaf Expander® or the rapid maxillary expander (RME), both anchored to the deciduous second molar.</p><p><strong>Trial design and setting: </strong>This study was a two-arm, parallel-assignment, RCT with a dual-centre design conducted at two teaching hospitals in Italy.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Inclusion criteria included maxillary transverse deficiency, prepubertal development stage (cervical vertebra maturation stage [CVMS] 1-2) and early mixed dentition with fully erupted upper first permanent molars. Exclusion criteria were systemic diseases or syndromes, CVMS 3-6, agenesis of upper second premolars, unavailability of the second deciduous molar for anchorage and Class III malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Randomization: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to the Leaf Expander® or RME group using a computer-generated randomization list created by a central randomization centre. Randomization was conducted immediately before the start of treatment.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention involved treatment with either the Leaf Expander® or the RME. Both devices were anchored to the second deciduous molars. Following randomization, patients were further categorized based on the presence of no crossbite, unilateral crossbite or bilateral crossbite.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The primary outcome measure was the distorotation of the upper first molar (U6). Secondary outcomes included measurements of interdental linear dimensions, specifically upper inter-canine width (53-63), upper inter-molar width (MV16-MV26) and upper inter-deciduous second molar width (55-65).</p><p><strong>Blinding: </strong>The examiner analysing the digital casts was blinded to the treatment groups to prevent detection bias and ensure objective assessment. However, due to the nature of the intervention, blinding was not feasible for the patients and clinicians involved in administering the treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: 75 to the Leaf Expander® group and 75 to the RME group. Recruitment started in November 2021 and was completed in November 2022. At the time of analysis, the trial was complete with no ongoing follow-ups. ANOVA tests revealed no significant differences between the three subgroups (no-cross, unilateral-cross and bilateral-cross) within both the Leaf Expander® and RME groups at T0. The Leaf Expander® demonstrated significantly greater distorotation in the unilateral crossbite subgroup compared to the RME (p = .014). In terms of total molar distorotation, the Leaf Expander® appliance showed a significantly greater effect (12.66°) compared with conventional RME (7.83°). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between the extent of expansion and the degree of molar rotation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maxillary expansion resulted in significant spontaneous molar distorotation when the appliance was bonded to the second deciduous molars. The Leaf Expander® exhibited significantly greater molar distorotation compared with conventional RME. The degree of molar distorotation was correlated with the extent of expansion obtained on the second deciduous molar.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05135962).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the spontaneous distorotation of upper first permanent molars and the transverse dentoalveolar changes on digital casts in growing patients following maxillary expansion treatment using either the Leaf Expander® or the rapid maxillary expander (RME), both anchored to the deciduous second molar.

Trial design and setting: This study was a two-arm, parallel-assignment, RCT with a dual-centre design conducted at two teaching hospitals in Italy.

Participants: Inclusion criteria included maxillary transverse deficiency, prepubertal development stage (cervical vertebra maturation stage [CVMS] 1-2) and early mixed dentition with fully erupted upper first permanent molars. Exclusion criteria were systemic diseases or syndromes, CVMS 3-6, agenesis of upper second premolars, unavailability of the second deciduous molar for anchorage and Class III malocclusion.

Randomization: Patients were randomly assigned to the Leaf Expander® or RME group using a computer-generated randomization list created by a central randomization centre. Randomization was conducted immediately before the start of treatment.

Intervention: The intervention involved treatment with either the Leaf Expander® or the RME. Both devices were anchored to the second deciduous molars. Following randomization, patients were further categorized based on the presence of no crossbite, unilateral crossbite or bilateral crossbite.

Main outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was the distorotation of the upper first molar (U6). Secondary outcomes included measurements of interdental linear dimensions, specifically upper inter-canine width (53-63), upper inter-molar width (MV16-MV26) and upper inter-deciduous second molar width (55-65).

Blinding: The examiner analysing the digital casts was blinded to the treatment groups to prevent detection bias and ensure objective assessment. However, due to the nature of the intervention, blinding was not feasible for the patients and clinicians involved in administering the treatment.

Results: A total of 150 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: 75 to the Leaf Expander® group and 75 to the RME group. Recruitment started in November 2021 and was completed in November 2022. At the time of analysis, the trial was complete with no ongoing follow-ups. ANOVA tests revealed no significant differences between the three subgroups (no-cross, unilateral-cross and bilateral-cross) within both the Leaf Expander® and RME groups at T0. The Leaf Expander® demonstrated significantly greater distorotation in the unilateral crossbite subgroup compared to the RME (p = .014). In terms of total molar distorotation, the Leaf Expander® appliance showed a significantly greater effect (12.66°) compared with conventional RME (7.83°). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between the extent of expansion and the degree of molar rotation.

Conclusions: Maxillary expansion resulted in significant spontaneous molar distorotation when the appliance was bonded to the second deciduous molars. The Leaf Expander® exhibited significantly greater molar distorotation compared with conventional RME. The degree of molar distorotation was correlated with the extent of expansion obtained on the second deciduous molar.

Trial registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05135962).

对Ni-ti叶状弹簧扩张器和快速上颌扩张器术后自发上第一磨牙歪斜的数字铸模进行三维评估:双中心随机对照试验。
研究目的本随机对照试验(RCT)的目的是评估生长期患者在使用叶片扩张器(Leaf Expander®)或快速上颌扩张器(RME)进行上颌扩张治疗后,上第一恒磨牙的自发旋转情况以及数字铸模上牙槽横向的变化情况:本研究是一项双臂、平行分配、RCT 双中心研究,在意大利的两家教学医院进行:纳入标准包括上颌横向缺失、青春期前发育阶段(颈椎成熟阶段 [CVMS] 1-2)和上第一恒磨牙完全萌出的早期混合牙列。排除标准为全身性疾病或综合征、颈椎成熟期 3-6、上第二前磨牙缺失、第二乳磨牙无法锚固以及 III 类错合畸形:患者被随机分配到Leaf Expander®或RME组,随机名单由中央随机中心通过计算机生成。随机化在治疗开始前进行:干预措施包括使用利图叶片扩张器® 或 RME 进行治疗。两种装置都固定在第二颗臼齿上。主要结果测量:主要结果测量是上第一磨牙(U6)的扭转。次要结果包括牙间线性尺寸的测量,特别是上犬齿间宽度(53-63)、上磨牙间宽度(MV16-MV26)和上臼齿间宽度(55-65):盲法:为防止检测偏差并确保评估的客观性,分析数字铸模的检查员对治疗组实行盲法。然而,由于干预的性质,对患者和参与治疗的临床医生进行盲法是不可行的:共招募了 150 名患者,并将他们随机分配到两组:75 人分配到叶片扩张器® 组,75 人分配到 RME 组。招募工作于 2021 年 11 月开始,2022 年 11 月结束。在进行分析时,试验已经结束,没有持续的随访。方差分析测试表明,叶片扩张器®组和 RME 组的三个分组(无交叉、单侧交叉和双侧交叉)在 T0 时均无显著差异。与 RME 相比,Leaf Expander® 在单侧交叉咬合亚组中的扭曲程度明显更大(p = .014)。就臼齿的总歪斜度而言,与传统的 RME(7.83°)相比,Leaf Expander®矫治器的效果明显更大(12.66°)。线性回归分析表明,扩容程度与臼齿旋转程度之间存在明显的相关性:结论:将上颌扩弓器粘结在第二颗落臼齿上时,会产生明显的自发臼齿旋转。与传统的 RME 相比,Leaf Expander® 的臼齿旋转程度明显更大。臼齿变形的程度与第二颗臼齿的扩张程度相关:该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(ID:NCT05135962)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信