Color Comparison Between Intraoral Scanner and Spectrophotometer Shade Matching: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 3区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13309

Viktória Vitai, Anna Németh, Brigitta Teutsch, Kata Kelemen, Alíz Fazekas, Péter Hegyi, Orsolya Németh, Beáta Kerémi, Judit Borbély

{"title":"Color Comparison Between Intraoral Scanner and Spectrophotometer Shade Matching: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Viktória Vitai, Anna Németh, Brigitta Teutsch, Kata Kelemen, Alíz Fazekas, Péter Hegyi, Orsolya Németh, Beáta Kerémi, Judit Borbély","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the accuracy of intraoral scanners and spectrophotometers in determining tooth shade.Materials and methods: An electronic search of five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL) was conducted on October 19, 2023. A total of 163 studies were identified from the databases, of which 23 articles were eligible for inclusion. In vivo and in vitro quasi-experimental studies were included. After data extraction, a quantitative analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of the intraoral scanner in subgroups using four outcomes: trueness and precision with different measurement locations. A random-effects model was used to pool effect sizes. The pooled proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for the effect size measure.Results: Eleven articles were included in the meta-analysis. Trueness with the intraoral scanner was between 0.28 (CI: 0.09-0.60) and 0.38 (CI: 0.24-0.53). Repeatability was between 0.81 (CI: 0.64-0.91) and 0.85 (CI: 0.74-0.92). Trueness showed low, and precision had moderate certainty of evidence.Conclusion: The trueness of shade matching with intraoral scanners is low compared to spectrophotometers, although the precision is considered high and is similar to spectrophotometers.Clinical significance: Shade determination with intraoral scanners is not recommended.","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the accuracy of intraoral scanners and spectrophotometers in determining tooth shade.

Materials and methods: An electronic search of five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL) was conducted on October 19, 2023. A total of 163 studies were identified from the databases, of which 23 articles were eligible for inclusion. In vivo and in vitro quasi-experimental studies were included. After data extraction, a quantitative analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of the intraoral scanner in subgroups using four outcomes: trueness and precision with different measurement locations. A random-effects model was used to pool effect sizes. The pooled proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for the effect size measure.

Results: Eleven articles were included in the meta-analysis. Trueness with the intraoral scanner was between 0.28 (CI: 0.09-0.60) and 0.38 (CI: 0.24-0.53). Repeatability was between 0.81 (CI: 0.64-0.91) and 0.85 (CI: 0.74-0.92). Trueness showed low, and precision had moderate certainty of evidence.

Conclusion: The trueness of shade matching with intraoral scanners is low compared to spectrophotometers, although the precision is considered high and is similar to spectrophotometers.

Clinical significance: Shade determination with intraoral scanners is not recommended.

查看原文本刊更多论文

口内扫描仪与分光光度计色调匹配的色彩比较：系统回顾与元分析。

目标：本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了口内扫描仪和分光光度计在确定牙齿色泽方面的准确性：于 2023 年 10 月 19 日对五个数据库（PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science、CENTRAL）进行了电子检索。从数据库中共找到 163 项研究，其中 23 篇符合纳入条件。其中包括体内和体外准实验研究。在提取数据后，进行了定量分析，以确定口内扫描仪在亚组中的准确性，包括四个结果：不同测量位置的真实度和精确度。采用随机效应模型汇总效应大小。在衡量效应大小时，使用了带有 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的汇总比例：共有 11 篇文章被纳入荟萃分析。口内扫描仪的真实度介于 0.28（CI：0.09-0.60）和 0.38（CI：0.24-0.53）之间。重复性介于 0.81（CI：0.64-0.91）和 0.85（CI：0.74-0.92）之间。真实度较低，精确度具有中等证据确定性：结论：与分光光度计相比，口内扫描仪的色调匹配真实度较低，但精确度较高，与分光光度计相似：临床意义：不建议使用口内扫描仪进行色度测定。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

6.20%

发文量

124

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics