{"title":"Identification of host endotypes using peripheral blood transcriptomics in a prospective cohort of patients with endocarditis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Host responses to infection are a major determinant of outcome. However, the existence of different response profiles in patients with endocarditis has not been addressed. Our objective was to apply transcriptomics to identify endotypes in patients with infective endocarditis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 32 patients with infective endocarditis were studied. Clinical data and blood samples were collected at diagnosis and RNA sequenced. Gene expression was used to identify two clusters (endocarditis endotype 1 [EE1] and endocarditis endotype 2 [EE2]). RNA sequencing was repeated after surgery. Transcriptionally active cell populations were identified by deconvolution. Differences between endotypes in clinical data, survival, gene expression, and molecular pathways involved were assessed. The identified endotypes were recapitulated in a cohort of COVID-19 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 18 and 14 patients were assigned to EE1 and EE2, respectively, with no differences in clinical data. Patients assigned to EE2 showed an enrichment in genes related to T-cell maturation and a decrease in the activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription protein family pathway, with higher counts of active T cells and lower counts of neutrophils. A total of 14 patients (nine in EE1 and five in EE2) were submitted to surgery. Surgery in EE2 patients shifted gene expression toward a EE1-like profile. In-hospital mortality was higher in EE1 (56% vs 14%, <em>P</em> = 0.027), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 12.987 (95% confidence interval 3.356-50). Translation of these endotypes to COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 septic patients yielded similar results in cell populations and outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Gene expression reveals two endotypes in patients with acute endocarditis, with different underlying pathogenetic mechanisms, responses to surgery, and outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224003060/pdfft?md5=31bc5e6eaf453be31b33bf20faeae6d8&pid=1-s2.0-S1201971224003060-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224003060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Host responses to infection are a major determinant of outcome. However, the existence of different response profiles in patients with endocarditis has not been addressed. Our objective was to apply transcriptomics to identify endotypes in patients with infective endocarditis.
Methods
A total of 32 patients with infective endocarditis were studied. Clinical data and blood samples were collected at diagnosis and RNA sequenced. Gene expression was used to identify two clusters (endocarditis endotype 1 [EE1] and endocarditis endotype 2 [EE2]). RNA sequencing was repeated after surgery. Transcriptionally active cell populations were identified by deconvolution. Differences between endotypes in clinical data, survival, gene expression, and molecular pathways involved were assessed. The identified endotypes were recapitulated in a cohort of COVID-19 patients.
Results
A total of 18 and 14 patients were assigned to EE1 and EE2, respectively, with no differences in clinical data. Patients assigned to EE2 showed an enrichment in genes related to T-cell maturation and a decrease in the activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription protein family pathway, with higher counts of active T cells and lower counts of neutrophils. A total of 14 patients (nine in EE1 and five in EE2) were submitted to surgery. Surgery in EE2 patients shifted gene expression toward a EE1-like profile. In-hospital mortality was higher in EE1 (56% vs 14%, P = 0.027), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 12.987 (95% confidence interval 3.356-50). Translation of these endotypes to COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 septic patients yielded similar results in cell populations and outcome.
Conclusions
Gene expression reveals two endotypes in patients with acute endocarditis, with different underlying pathogenetic mechanisms, responses to surgery, and outcomes.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID)
Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases
Publication Frequency: Monthly
Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access
Scope:
Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research.
Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports.
Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases.
Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.