Re-evaluating intra-cardiac arrest adjunctive medications and routes of drug administration.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001206
Peter C Lind, Mikael F Vallentin, Asger Granfeldt, Lars W Andersen
{"title":"Re-evaluating intra-cardiac arrest adjunctive medications and routes of drug administration.","authors":"Peter C Lind, Mikael F Vallentin, Asger Granfeldt, Lars W Andersen","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This narrative review summarizes the evidence for the most commonly used intra-cardiac arrest adjunctive medications and routes of administration and discusses promising new therapies from preclinical animal models.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Large trials on the administration of calcium as well as the combination of vasopressin and glucocorticoids during cardiac arrest have been published. Calcium administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not improve outcomes and might cause harm. Vasopressin and glucocorticoid administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve the chance of return of spontaneous circulation but has uncertain effects on survival. We identified a total of seven ongoing clinical trials investigating the potential role of bicarbonate, of vasopressin and glucocorticoids, and of intravenous versus intraosseous vascular access. Several medications such as levosimendan and inhaled nitric oxide show promise in preclinical studies, and clinical trials are either planned or actively recruiting.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Large trials on intra-cardiac arrest administration of calcium and vasopressin with glucocorticoids have been performed. Several trials are ongoing that will provide valuable insights into the potential benefit of other intra-cardiac arrest medications such as bicarbonate as well as the potential benefit of intravenous or intraosseous vascular access.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This narrative review summarizes the evidence for the most commonly used intra-cardiac arrest adjunctive medications and routes of administration and discusses promising new therapies from preclinical animal models.

Recent findings: Large trials on the administration of calcium as well as the combination of vasopressin and glucocorticoids during cardiac arrest have been published. Calcium administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation does not improve outcomes and might cause harm. Vasopressin and glucocorticoid administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve the chance of return of spontaneous circulation but has uncertain effects on survival. We identified a total of seven ongoing clinical trials investigating the potential role of bicarbonate, of vasopressin and glucocorticoids, and of intravenous versus intraosseous vascular access. Several medications such as levosimendan and inhaled nitric oxide show promise in preclinical studies, and clinical trials are either planned or actively recruiting.

Summary: Large trials on intra-cardiac arrest administration of calcium and vasopressin with glucocorticoids have been performed. Several trials are ongoing that will provide valuable insights into the potential benefit of other intra-cardiac arrest medications such as bicarbonate as well as the potential benefit of intravenous or intraosseous vascular access.

重新评估心脏骤停时的辅助用药和给药途径。
综述的目的:这篇叙述性综述总结了心脏骤停时最常用的辅助药物和给药途径的证据,并讨论了临床前动物模型中前景看好的新疗法:最近的研究结果:关于心脏骤停期间钙剂给药以及血管加压素和糖皮质激素联合给药的大型试验已经发表。在心肺复苏期间服用钙剂并不能改善预后,还可能造成伤害。在心肺复苏期间使用血管加压素和糖皮质激素可提高自发循环恢复的几率,但对存活率的影响不确定。我们共发现了七项正在进行的临床试验,研究碳酸氢盐、血管加压素和糖皮质激素的潜在作用,以及静脉血管通路与骨内血管通路的潜在作用。一些药物,如左西孟旦和吸入一氧化氮,在临床前研究中显示出前景,临床试验正在计划中或积极招募中。摘要:关于心脏骤停时给予钙和血管加压素与糖皮质激素的大型试验已经完成。目前正在进行的几项试验将为了解碳酸氢盐等其他心脏骤停用药的潜在益处以及静脉或骨内血管通路的潜在益处提供宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信