Triptan non-response in a London tertiary headache centre: What can we learn? A retrospective study.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Robyn-Jenia Wilcha, Peter J Goadsby
{"title":"Triptan non-response in a London tertiary headache centre: What can we learn? A retrospective study.","authors":"Robyn-Jenia Wilcha, Peter J Goadsby","doi":"10.1177/03331024241278911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Triptans revolutionized the acute treatment of migraine; however, varied responses to triptans, as a result of poor efficacy and tolerability, are reported. A standardized definition of triptan non-response was recently proposed by the European Headache Federation (EHF). There is currently limited data available on the prevalence of triptan non-response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used clinic letters over a two-year duration to evaluate the triptan response and triptan efficacy or tolerability failure, or both, in a London-based tertiary headache service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 419 adult migraine patients (females: 83.8%, age: 46 ± 18 years, chronic migraine: 88.5%) were included in a service evaluation. In line with the EHF definitions, \"triptan non-response\" was seen in 63.8% of patients (264/414), whereas 37.7% of patients (156/414) had failed at least two triptans (EHF \"triptan resistant\") and 4.6% of patients (19/414) had failed at least three triptans, including a subcutaneous formulation (EHF \"triptan refractory\"). Notably, 21.3% of patients (88/414) had failed at least three triptans inclusive and exclusive of subcutaneous triptan use. Advancing age (<i>p </i>< 0.001) and the presence of medication overuse (<i>p </i>= 0.006) increased the probability of triptan response, whereas an increased number of failed preventives (<i>p </i>< 0.001) and the use of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (<i>p </i>= 0.022) increased the probability of triptan non-response. The largest proportion of patients responded to eletriptan (49.5%), followed by nasal zolmitriptan (44.4%) and rizatriptan (35.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight an alarming prevalence of triptan non-response among adult migraineurs receiving treatment in a London-based tertiary headache service. It is imperative for clinicians to explore methods to optimize acute medication efficacy, whether this comprises changing to a triptan with a superior response rate, advocating for early intervention or considering alternative acute medication classes, such as gepants or ditans.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024241278911","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Triptans revolutionized the acute treatment of migraine; however, varied responses to triptans, as a result of poor efficacy and tolerability, are reported. A standardized definition of triptan non-response was recently proposed by the European Headache Federation (EHF). There is currently limited data available on the prevalence of triptan non-response.

Methods: We used clinic letters over a two-year duration to evaluate the triptan response and triptan efficacy or tolerability failure, or both, in a London-based tertiary headache service.

Results: In total, 419 adult migraine patients (females: 83.8%, age: 46 ± 18 years, chronic migraine: 88.5%) were included in a service evaluation. In line with the EHF definitions, "triptan non-response" was seen in 63.8% of patients (264/414), whereas 37.7% of patients (156/414) had failed at least two triptans (EHF "triptan resistant") and 4.6% of patients (19/414) had failed at least three triptans, including a subcutaneous formulation (EHF "triptan refractory"). Notably, 21.3% of patients (88/414) had failed at least three triptans inclusive and exclusive of subcutaneous triptan use. Advancing age (p < 0.001) and the presence of medication overuse (p = 0.006) increased the probability of triptan response, whereas an increased number of failed preventives (p < 0.001) and the use of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (p = 0.022) increased the probability of triptan non-response. The largest proportion of patients responded to eletriptan (49.5%), followed by nasal zolmitriptan (44.4%) and rizatriptan (35.7%).

Conclusions: Our findings highlight an alarming prevalence of triptan non-response among adult migraineurs receiving treatment in a London-based tertiary headache service. It is imperative for clinicians to explore methods to optimize acute medication efficacy, whether this comprises changing to a triptan with a superior response rate, advocating for early intervention or considering alternative acute medication classes, such as gepants or ditans.

伦敦一家三级头痛中心的 "三苯氧胺 "无应答现象:我们能学到什么?回顾性研究。
背景:曲普坦彻底改变了偏头痛的急性治疗方法;然而,由于疗效和耐受性不佳,对曲普坦的反应各不相同。欧洲头痛联盟(EHF)最近提出了三苯氧胺无应答的标准化定义。目前关于三苯氧胺无应答的数据还很有限:方法:我们使用为期两年的门诊信函,对伦敦一家三级头痛服务机构的三普坦反应和三普坦疗效或耐受性失败或两者兼而有之的情况进行了评估:共有 419 名成年偏头痛患者(女性:83.8%,年龄:46 ± 18 岁,慢性偏头痛:88.5%)接受了服务评估。根据欧洲偏头痛基金会的定义,63.8%的患者(264/414)对 "三苯氧胺无应答",37.7%的患者(156/414)至少服用两种三苯氧胺无效(欧洲偏头痛基金会 "三苯氧胺耐药"),4.6%的患者(19/414)至少服用三种三苯氧胺无效,包括皮下注射制剂(欧洲偏头痛基金会 "三苯氧胺难治")。值得注意的是,21.3% 的患者(88/414)至少服用过三种三苯氧胺,包括皮下注射三苯氧胺。年龄的增长(p p = 0.006)增加了三联类药物应答的概率,而预防失败次数的增加(p p = 0.022)则增加了三联类药物无应答的概率。对依立普坦有反应的患者比例最高(49.5%),其次是鼻用佐米曲普坦(44.4%)和利扎曲普坦(35.7%):我们的研究结果表明,在伦敦的一家三级头痛服务机构接受治疗的成年偏头痛患者中,对曲普坦无反应的发生率令人震惊。临床医生必须探索优化急性期药物疗效的方法,包括改用反应率更高的三苯氧胺、提倡早期干预或考虑使用其他急性期药物,如吉潘或地坦类药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信