Task-Based Attentional Control: The Role of Anxiety and Age.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Amanda E Messerlie, Leslie M Guidotti Breting, John E Calamari, Jerry J Sweet, Elizabeth K Geary, Jenna Axelrod, Alec C Neale, Monika A Waszczuk
{"title":"Task-Based Attentional Control: The Role of Anxiety and Age.","authors":"Amanda E Messerlie, Leslie M Guidotti Breting, John E Calamari, Jerry J Sweet, Elizabeth K Geary, Jenna Axelrod, Alec C Neale, Monika A Waszczuk","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Attentional Control Theory (ACT) posits that anxiety impacts cognitive functioning through interference in working memory and processing efficiency, resulting in performance deficits in set-shifting and inhibition. Few studies have examined the effects of anxiety on set-shifting and inhibition in clinical samples or how these relationships might be affected by age. The current study tested whether increased age, elevated anxiety, and their interaction were associated with reduced performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Symptom and neuropsychological testing data were obtained from outpatient participants presenting at an academic medical center (N = 521; mean age = 50.39 years, SD = 22.35, range = 18-90; 47.4% female; 78.3% White). The Trail Making Test Difference score was used to assess set-shifting and the Stroop Color-Word Test Interference score was used to assess inhibition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for demographic variables, ADHD diagnosis, depression symptoms, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), both age and anxiety were significant predictors of set-shifting (β = 0.45 and β = 0.18, respectively, ps < 0.001) and inhibition (β = -0.37, p < 0.001 and β = -0.19, p = 0.001, respectively). No interaction was found between age and anxiety in the prediction of set-shifting or inhibition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Congruent with ACT, anxiety was associated with worse performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition. Older age was an independent predictor of worse set-shifting and inhibition but did not moderate the relationship between anxiety and attentional control, suggesting that anxiety adversely affected working memory and processing efficiency equivalently across the adult lifespan. The results highlight the importance of anxiety assessment in neuropsychological evaluation in patients of all ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Attentional Control Theory (ACT) posits that anxiety impacts cognitive functioning through interference in working memory and processing efficiency, resulting in performance deficits in set-shifting and inhibition. Few studies have examined the effects of anxiety on set-shifting and inhibition in clinical samples or how these relationships might be affected by age. The current study tested whether increased age, elevated anxiety, and their interaction were associated with reduced performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition.

Method: Symptom and neuropsychological testing data were obtained from outpatient participants presenting at an academic medical center (N = 521; mean age = 50.39 years, SD = 22.35, range = 18-90; 47.4% female; 78.3% White). The Trail Making Test Difference score was used to assess set-shifting and the Stroop Color-Word Test Interference score was used to assess inhibition.

Results: After controlling for demographic variables, ADHD diagnosis, depression symptoms, and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), both age and anxiety were significant predictors of set-shifting (β = 0.45 and β = 0.18, respectively, ps < 0.001) and inhibition (β = -0.37, p < 0.001 and β = -0.19, p = 0.001, respectively). No interaction was found between age and anxiety in the prediction of set-shifting or inhibition.

Conclusion: Congruent with ACT, anxiety was associated with worse performance on measures of set-shifting and inhibition. Older age was an independent predictor of worse set-shifting and inhibition but did not moderate the relationship between anxiety and attentional control, suggesting that anxiety adversely affected working memory and processing efficiency equivalently across the adult lifespan. The results highlight the importance of anxiety assessment in neuropsychological evaluation in patients of all ages.

基于任务的注意力控制:焦虑和年龄的作用
研究目的注意控制理论(ACT)认为,焦虑会通过干扰工作记忆和处理效率来影响认知功能,从而导致集合转换和抑制方面的表现缺陷。很少有研究探讨在临床样本中焦虑对集合转换和抑制的影响,或这些关系如何受到年龄的影响。本研究测试了年龄的增加、焦虑的升高以及它们之间的相互影响是否与集合转换和抑制能力的降低有关:从一家学术医疗中心的门诊参与者(N = 521;平均年龄 = 50.39 岁,SD = 22.35,范围 = 18-90;47.4% 为女性;78.3% 为白人)处获得症状和神经心理学测试数据。用 "走小路测试差异分 "评估 "集合转移",用 "Stroop颜色-文字测试干扰分 "评估 "抑制":结果:在控制了人口统计学变量、ADHD 诊断、抑郁症状和轻度认知障碍(MCI)之后,年龄和焦虑均可显著预测集合转移(β = 0.45 和 β = 0.18,ps 结论:与 ACT 相一致,焦虑也可显著预测集合转移:与 ACT 一致,焦虑与集合转换和抑制测量的成绩较差有关。年龄越大,集合转换和抑制能力越差的独立预测因素就越大,但这并没有缓和焦虑与注意控制之间的关系,这表明焦虑对成人整个生命周期的工作记忆和处理效率的负面影响是相同的。这些结果凸显了焦虑评估在各年龄段患者神经心理学评估中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信