Predicting the Risk of Fundus Lesions in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Nomogram Model

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Huan Xie, Fangfang Sun, Huimin Yang, Jin Li
{"title":"Predicting the Risk of Fundus Lesions in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Nomogram Model","authors":"Huan Xie,&nbsp;Fangfang Sun,&nbsp;Huimin Yang,&nbsp;Jin Li","doi":"10.1155/2024/1536520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Objectives</i>. This study aimed to use laboratory and clinical data of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients to construct prediction models for fundus complications in SLE. <i>Methods</i>. Routine blood test data and clinical information of 277 SLE patients were collected retrospectively. Based on their fundus examination, they were divided into two groups, with or without fundus lesions, defined as retinopathy and choroidopathy in this study. The data of the two groups were compared, and the prediction model was established using binary logistic regression analysis. <i>Results</i>. There were 85 patients in the fundus lesions’ group and 192 patients in the control group. Between the two groups, age, SLEDAI, serositis, hypertension, diabetes, anticardiolipin antibody (ACA), anti-Sm antibody, C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count (PLT), albumin (Alb), serum creatinine(Scr), urea, uric acid(UA), and immunoglobulin G(IgG) were significantly different (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Besides, age, SLEDAI, serositis, hypertension, diabetes, anti-SSB, CRP, Hb, PLT, FIB, Alb, Scr, urea, UA, GLU, and IgG were significantly correlated with SLE-related fundus lesions. PLT, fibrinogen (FIB), IgG, and urea were independent risk factors of SLE-related fundus lesions. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.830 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; 95% CI = 0.762–0.898), and the nomogram was established with great evaluation efficiency demonstrated by the calibration curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. The result of k-fold cross-validation also showed high prediction accuracy. <i>Conclusions</i>. We have found the independent risk factors of SLE-related fundus lesions and developed a model to improve the prediction of fundus lesions in SLE.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1536520","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1536520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. This study aimed to use laboratory and clinical data of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients to construct prediction models for fundus complications in SLE. Methods. Routine blood test data and clinical information of 277 SLE patients were collected retrospectively. Based on their fundus examination, they were divided into two groups, with or without fundus lesions, defined as retinopathy and choroidopathy in this study. The data of the two groups were compared, and the prediction model was established using binary logistic regression analysis. Results. There were 85 patients in the fundus lesions’ group and 192 patients in the control group. Between the two groups, age, SLEDAI, serositis, hypertension, diabetes, anticardiolipin antibody (ACA), anti-Sm antibody, C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count (PLT), albumin (Alb), serum creatinine(Scr), urea, uric acid(UA), and immunoglobulin G(IgG) were significantly different (p < 0.05). Besides, age, SLEDAI, serositis, hypertension, diabetes, anti-SSB, CRP, Hb, PLT, FIB, Alb, Scr, urea, UA, GLU, and IgG were significantly correlated with SLE-related fundus lesions. PLT, fibrinogen (FIB), IgG, and urea were independent risk factors of SLE-related fundus lesions. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.830 (p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.762–0.898), and the nomogram was established with great evaluation efficiency demonstrated by the calibration curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. The result of k-fold cross-validation also showed high prediction accuracy. Conclusions. We have found the independent risk factors of SLE-related fundus lesions and developed a model to improve the prediction of fundus lesions in SLE.

Abstract Image

预测系统性红斑狼疮眼底病变的风险:提名图模型
研究目的本研究旨在利用系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的实验室和临床数据,构建系统性红斑狼疮眼底并发症的预测模型。研究方法回顾性收集了 277 名系统性红斑狼疮患者的常规血液检测数据和临床信息。根据眼底检查结果,他们被分为有眼底病变和无眼底病变两组,在本研究中被定义为视网膜病变和脉络膜病变。比较两组患者的数据,并使用二元逻辑回归分析建立预测模型。结果眼底病变组有 85 名患者,对照组有 192 名患者。两组患者的年龄、SLEDAI、血清炎、高血压、糖尿病、抗心磷脂抗体(ACA)、抗Sm抗体、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血红蛋白(Hb)、血小板计数(PLT)、白蛋白(Alb)、血清肌酐(Scr)、尿素、尿酸(UA)和免疫球蛋白G(IgG)均有显著差异(P <0.05)。此外,年龄、SLEDAI、血清炎、高血压、糖尿病、抗-SSB、CRP、Hb、PLT、FIB、Alb、Scr、尿素、UA、GLU 和 IgG 与系统性红斑狼疮相关眼底病变有明显相关性。PLT、纤维蛋白原(FIB)、IgG和尿素是系统性红斑狼疮相关眼底病变的独立危险因素。曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.830 (p < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.762-0.898),通过校准曲线和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验,建立的提名图具有很高的评价效率。k 倍交叉验证的结果也显示了较高的预测准确性。结论我们发现了系统性红斑狼疮相关眼底病变的独立危险因素,并建立了一个模型来改善对系统性红斑狼疮眼底病变的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信