Pharmaceuticals in raw and treated water from drinking water treatment plants nationwide: Insights into their sources and exposure risk assessment

IF 7.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Kimberly Etombi Muambo , Min-Gyeong Kim , Da-Hye Kim , Sangmin Park , Jeong-Eun Oh
{"title":"Pharmaceuticals in raw and treated water from drinking water treatment plants nationwide: Insights into their sources and exposure risk assessment","authors":"Kimberly Etombi Muambo ,&nbsp;Min-Gyeong Kim ,&nbsp;Da-Hye Kim ,&nbsp;Sangmin Park ,&nbsp;Jeong-Eun Oh","doi":"10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to the large amounts of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) currently being consumed and released into the environment, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of pharmaceutical pollution in both raw and treated water from full-scale drinking water treatment plants nationwide. Our investigation revealed that 30 out of 37 PPCPs were present in raw water with mean concentrations ranging from 0.01–131 ng/L. The raw water sources, surface water (ND – 147 ng/L), subsurface water (ND – 123 ng/L) and reservoir sources (ND – 135 ng/L) exhibited higher mean concentration levels of pharmaceutical residues compared to groundwater sources (ND – 1.89 ng/L). Meanwhile, in treated water, 17 of the 37 analyzed PPCPs were present with carbamazepine, clarithromycin, fluconazole, telmisartan, valsartan, and cotinine being the most common (detection frequency &gt; 40 %), and having mean concentrations of 1.22, 0.12, 3.48, 40.1, 6.36, and 3.73 ng/L, respectively. These findings highlight that, while water treatment processes are effective, there are some persistent compounds that prove challenging to fully eliminate. Using Monte Carlo simulations, risk assessment indicated that most of these compounds are likely to have negligible impact on human health, except for the antihypertensives. Telmisartan was identified as posing the highest ecological risk (RQ &gt; 1), warranting further investigation, and monitoring. The study concludes by prioritizing specific 14 pharmaceuticals, including telmisartan, clarithromycin, lamotrigine, cotinine, lidocaine, tramadol, and others, for future monitoring to safeguard both ecological and human health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52198,"journal":{"name":"Water Research X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258991472400046X/pdfft?md5=c0449fa744b973488f0454b58804b7b9&pid=1-s2.0-S258991472400046X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research X","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258991472400046X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the large amounts of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) currently being consumed and released into the environment, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of pharmaceutical pollution in both raw and treated water from full-scale drinking water treatment plants nationwide. Our investigation revealed that 30 out of 37 PPCPs were present in raw water with mean concentrations ranging from 0.01–131 ng/L. The raw water sources, surface water (ND – 147 ng/L), subsurface water (ND – 123 ng/L) and reservoir sources (ND – 135 ng/L) exhibited higher mean concentration levels of pharmaceutical residues compared to groundwater sources (ND – 1.89 ng/L). Meanwhile, in treated water, 17 of the 37 analyzed PPCPs were present with carbamazepine, clarithromycin, fluconazole, telmisartan, valsartan, and cotinine being the most common (detection frequency > 40 %), and having mean concentrations of 1.22, 0.12, 3.48, 40.1, 6.36, and 3.73 ng/L, respectively. These findings highlight that, while water treatment processes are effective, there are some persistent compounds that prove challenging to fully eliminate. Using Monte Carlo simulations, risk assessment indicated that most of these compounds are likely to have negligible impact on human health, except for the antihypertensives. Telmisartan was identified as posing the highest ecological risk (RQ > 1), warranting further investigation, and monitoring. The study concludes by prioritizing specific 14 pharmaceuticals, including telmisartan, clarithromycin, lamotrigine, cotinine, lidocaine, tramadol, and others, for future monitoring to safeguard both ecological and human health.

Abstract Image

全国饮用水处理厂的原水和处理水中的药物:洞察其来源和暴露风险评估
由于目前有大量的药物和个人护理产品(PPCPs)被消费并释放到环境中,本研究对全国范围内大型饮用水处理厂的原水和处理水中的药物污染进行了全面分析。调查显示,37 种 PPCPs 中有 30 种存在于原水中,平均浓度范围为 0.01-131 纳克/升。与地下水源(ND - 1.89 ng/L)相比,地表水源(ND - 147 ng/L)、地下水源(ND - 123 ng/L)和水库水源(ND - 135 ng/L)的原水中药物残留的平均浓度水平更高。同时,在处理过的水中,37 种分析过的 PPCPs 中有 17 种存在,其中卡马西平、克拉霉素、氟康唑、替米沙坦、缬沙坦和可替宁最为常见(检测频率为 40%),平均浓度分别为 1.22、0.12、3.48、40.1、6.36 和 3.73 纳克/升。这些发现突出表明,虽然水处理工艺是有效的,但仍有一些持久性化合物难以完全消除。利用蒙特卡罗模拟进行的风险评估表明,除了降压药之外,大多数化合物对人体健康的影响可能微乎其微。替米沙坦被认为具有最高的生态风险(RQ > 1),值得进一步调查和监测。研究最后确定了 14 种特定药品的优先次序,包括替米沙坦、克拉霉素、拉莫三嗪、可替宁、利多卡因、曲马多和其他药物,以便在未来进行监测,从而保障生态和人类健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Research X
Water Research X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Water Research X is a sister journal of Water Research, which follows a Gold Open Access model. It focuses on publishing concise, letter-style research papers, visionary perspectives and editorials, as well as mini-reviews on emerging topics. The Journal invites contributions from researchers worldwide on various aspects of the science and technology related to the human impact on the water cycle, water quality, and its global management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信