To cooperate, or not to cooperate, that is the question. Strategic analysis for the implementation of industrial symbiosis

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
{"title":"To cooperate, or not to cooperate, that is the question. Strategic analysis for the implementation of industrial symbiosis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The lack of adequate support in strategic decision-making hampers the widespread of industrial symbiosis (IS). Although various business models for IS are available, existing literature focuses solely on cooperation between waste producers and waste users to replace primary inputs with waste. This paper proposes a strategic analysis for waste producers introducing IS, comparing the traditional cooperative approach with a competitive new product development strategy. Using a game-theoretical model, a third hybrid strategy is defined. The paper examines the impact of market characteristics, investment requirements, IS costs, and primary input purchase costs on the strategic choices of waste producers, providing insights for managers and decision-makers. Results suggest that the characteristics of the market where to enter significantly affect the final strategic behavior. Specifically, the main strategic discriminating factors are the market size, the consumers’ willingness to pay, and the investment extent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924004865/pdfft?md5=b863e97727e962ca117a0576bcf0f3ed&pid=1-s2.0-S0921344924004865-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924004865","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of adequate support in strategic decision-making hampers the widespread of industrial symbiosis (IS). Although various business models for IS are available, existing literature focuses solely on cooperation between waste producers and waste users to replace primary inputs with waste. This paper proposes a strategic analysis for waste producers introducing IS, comparing the traditional cooperative approach with a competitive new product development strategy. Using a game-theoretical model, a third hybrid strategy is defined. The paper examines the impact of market characteristics, investment requirements, IS costs, and primary input purchase costs on the strategic choices of waste producers, providing insights for managers and decision-makers. Results suggest that the characteristics of the market where to enter significantly affect the final strategic behavior. Specifically, the main strategic discriminating factors are the market size, the consumers’ willingness to pay, and the investment extent.

合作还是不合作,这是一个问题。实施工业共生的战略分析
战略决策缺乏足够的支持阻碍了工业共生(IS)的广泛开展。虽然工业共生有多种商业模式,但现有文献仅关注废物生产者和废物使用者之间的合作,以废物替代主要投入。本文对引入 IS 的废物生产商进行了战略分析,比较了传统合作方式和竞争性新产品开发战略。利用博弈理论模型,定义了第三种混合战略。本文研究了市场特征、投资要求、基础设施服务成本和主要投入采购成本对废物生产商战略选择的影响,为管理者和决策者提供了启示。结果表明,拟进入市场的特征对最终战略行为有重大影响。具体而言,市场规模、消费者支付意愿和投资程度是主要的战略判别因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信