Wei-Tsung Lai , I-Chen Chen , Ming-Chon Hsiung , Ting-Chao Lin , Kuan-Chih Huang , Chung-Yi Chang , Jeng Wei
{"title":"Recovery of left ventricular function after surgery for aortic and mitral regurgitation with heart failure","authors":"Wei-Tsung Lai , I-Chen Chen , Ming-Chon Hsiung , Ting-Chao Lin , Kuan-Chih Huang , Chung-Yi Chang , Jeng Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) can lead to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction; however, there are limited data about recovery of LV after surgery for AR or MR. Little is known to guide the management of combined AR and MR (mixed valvular heart disease [VHD]). This study is sought to investigate the predictors of postoperative LV function recovery in left-sided regurgitant VHD with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), especially for mixed VHD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From 2010 to 2020, 2053 adult patients underwent aortic or mitral valve surgery at our center. The patients with valvular stenosis, infective endocarditis, concomitant revascularization, and preoperative LVEF ≥40 % were excluded. A total of 127 patients were included in this study: 22 patients with predominant AR (AR group), 64 with predominant MR (MR group), and 41 with combined AR and MR (AMR group).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean preoperative LVEF was 32.4 %, 30.7 %, and 30.2 % (p = 0.44) in the AR, MR, and AMR groups, respectively. The AR group was more likely to have postoperative LVEF recovery. The cut-point of left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) for better recovery was 49 mm for the MR group and 58 mm for the AMR group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>LV dysfunction due to combined AR and MR has similar remodeling reserve as AR, and better recoverability than MR. Thus, double-valve surgery is recommended before the LVESD is > 58 mm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 200329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000941/pdfft?md5=8423d537bbd958f875a3fa60fe985bbe&pid=1-s2.0-S2772487524000941-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) can lead to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction; however, there are limited data about recovery of LV after surgery for AR or MR. Little is known to guide the management of combined AR and MR (mixed valvular heart disease [VHD]). This study is sought to investigate the predictors of postoperative LV function recovery in left-sided regurgitant VHD with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), especially for mixed VHD.
Methods
From 2010 to 2020, 2053 adult patients underwent aortic or mitral valve surgery at our center. The patients with valvular stenosis, infective endocarditis, concomitant revascularization, and preoperative LVEF ≥40 % were excluded. A total of 127 patients were included in this study: 22 patients with predominant AR (AR group), 64 with predominant MR (MR group), and 41 with combined AR and MR (AMR group).
Results
The mean preoperative LVEF was 32.4 %, 30.7 %, and 30.2 % (p = 0.44) in the AR, MR, and AMR groups, respectively. The AR group was more likely to have postoperative LVEF recovery. The cut-point of left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) for better recovery was 49 mm for the MR group and 58 mm for the AMR group.
Conclusion
LV dysfunction due to combined AR and MR has similar remodeling reserve as AR, and better recoverability than MR. Thus, double-valve surgery is recommended before the LVESD is > 58 mm.