Recovery of left ventricular function after surgery for aortic and mitral regurgitation with heart failure

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Wei-Tsung Lai , I-Chen Chen , Ming-Chon Hsiung , Ting-Chao Lin , Kuan-Chih Huang , Chung-Yi Chang , Jeng Wei
{"title":"Recovery of left ventricular function after surgery for aortic and mitral regurgitation with heart failure","authors":"Wei-Tsung Lai ,&nbsp;I-Chen Chen ,&nbsp;Ming-Chon Hsiung ,&nbsp;Ting-Chao Lin ,&nbsp;Kuan-Chih Huang ,&nbsp;Chung-Yi Chang ,&nbsp;Jeng Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) can lead to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction; however, there are limited data about recovery of LV after surgery for AR or MR. Little is known to guide the management of combined AR and MR (mixed valvular heart disease [VHD]). This study is sought to investigate the predictors of postoperative LV function recovery in left-sided regurgitant VHD with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), especially for mixed VHD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From 2010 to 2020, 2053 adult patients underwent aortic or mitral valve surgery at our center. The patients with valvular stenosis, infective endocarditis, concomitant revascularization, and preoperative LVEF ≥40 % were excluded. A total of 127 patients were included in this study: 22 patients with predominant AR (AR group), 64 with predominant MR (MR group), and 41 with combined AR and MR (AMR group).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean preoperative LVEF was 32.4 %, 30.7 %, and 30.2 % (p = 0.44) in the AR, MR, and AMR groups, respectively. The AR group was more likely to have postoperative LVEF recovery. The cut-point of left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) for better recovery was 49 mm for the MR group and 58 mm for the AMR group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>LV dysfunction due to combined AR and MR has similar remodeling reserve as AR, and better recoverability than MR. Thus, double-valve surgery is recommended before the LVESD is &gt; 58 mm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 200329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000941/pdfft?md5=8423d537bbd958f875a3fa60fe985bbe&pid=1-s2.0-S2772487524000941-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) can lead to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction; however, there are limited data about recovery of LV after surgery for AR or MR. Little is known to guide the management of combined AR and MR (mixed valvular heart disease [VHD]). This study is sought to investigate the predictors of postoperative LV function recovery in left-sided regurgitant VHD with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), especially for mixed VHD.

Methods

From 2010 to 2020, 2053 adult patients underwent aortic or mitral valve surgery at our center. The patients with valvular stenosis, infective endocarditis, concomitant revascularization, and preoperative LVEF ≥40 % were excluded. A total of 127 patients were included in this study: 22 patients with predominant AR (AR group), 64 with predominant MR (MR group), and 41 with combined AR and MR (AMR group).

Results

The mean preoperative LVEF was 32.4 %, 30.7 %, and 30.2 % (p = 0.44) in the AR, MR, and AMR groups, respectively. The AR group was more likely to have postoperative LVEF recovery. The cut-point of left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) for better recovery was 49 mm for the MR group and 58 mm for the AMR group.

Conclusion

LV dysfunction due to combined AR and MR has similar remodeling reserve as AR, and better recoverability than MR. Thus, double-valve surgery is recommended before the LVESD is > 58 mm.

心力衰竭主动脉瓣和二尖瓣反流手术后左心室功能的恢复
背景严重的主动脉瓣反流(AR)和二尖瓣反流(MR)可导致左心室收缩功能障碍;然而,有关 AR 或 MR 手术后左心室恢复情况的数据十分有限。对于如何指导合并 AR 和 MR(混合瓣膜性心脏病 [VHD])的治疗,目前所知甚少。本研究旨在探讨左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的左侧反流性 VHD(尤其是混合型 VHD)术后左心室功能恢复的预测因素。方法从 2010 年到 2020 年,共有 2053 名成年患者在本中心接受了主动脉瓣或二尖瓣手术。排除了瓣膜狭窄、感染性心内膜炎、同时接受血管重建手术以及术前 LVEF ≥ 40 % 的患者。结果 AR组、MR组和AMR组的术前平均LVEF分别为32.4%、30.7%和30.2%(P = 0.44)。AR 组术后 LVEF 恢复的可能性更大。MR组恢复较好的左心室收缩末期直径(LVESD)切点为49毫米,AMR组为58毫米。因此,建议在 LVESD 达到 58 mm 之前进行双瓣膜手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信