Does the effectiveness of a reading intervention differ dependent on students' Spanish or English proficiencies?

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Erin Hogan , Sharon Vaughn , Anna-Mari Fall , Philip Capin , Jeremy Miciak , Greg Roberts
{"title":"Does the effectiveness of a reading intervention differ dependent on students' Spanish or English proficiencies?","authors":"Erin Hogan ,&nbsp;Sharon Vaughn ,&nbsp;Anna-Mari Fall ,&nbsp;Philip Capin ,&nbsp;Jeremy Miciak ,&nbsp;Greg Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated whether linguistic proficiencies in students' first language (L1)— Spanish—and English (L2) moderated the response to intensive reading intervention for sixth- and seventh-grade multilingual learners (MLs) with reading difficulties. We used confirmatory factor analysis to estimate proficiency scores in English and Spanish using measures of expressive and receptive vocabulary, syntax, and grammar. We then used latent variable moderated structural equation modeling to evaluate how proficiency in English and Spanish moderated the effect of treatment on students' reading outcomes in response to intervention. Two important findings occurred. First, the overall linguistic proficiencies of the sample were below average, suggesting the prevalence of low L1 and L2 may be high among the population of middle gradeMLs with reading difficulties. Second, we observed only one significant moderation effect: the effect of treatment on students' letter and word recognition was statistically significantly higher for students with higher English proficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 102546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001390","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated whether linguistic proficiencies in students' first language (L1)— Spanish—and English (L2) moderated the response to intensive reading intervention for sixth- and seventh-grade multilingual learners (MLs) with reading difficulties. We used confirmatory factor analysis to estimate proficiency scores in English and Spanish using measures of expressive and receptive vocabulary, syntax, and grammar. We then used latent variable moderated structural equation modeling to evaluate how proficiency in English and Spanish moderated the effect of treatment on students' reading outcomes in response to intervention. Two important findings occurred. First, the overall linguistic proficiencies of the sample were below average, suggesting the prevalence of low L1 and L2 may be high among the population of middle gradeMLs with reading difficulties. Second, we observed only one significant moderation effect: the effect of treatment on students' letter and word recognition was statistically significantly higher for students with higher English proficiency.

学生的西班牙语或英语水平不同,阅读干预的效果也不同吗?
本研究调查了学生第一语言(L1)--西班牙语和第二语言(L2)--的语言能力是否调节了六年级和七年级有阅读困难的多语言学习者(MLs)对强化阅读干预的反应。我们使用确证因素分析法,通过对表达和接受词汇、句法和语法的测量来估算英语和西班牙语的能力分数。然后,我们使用潜变量调节结构方程模型来评估英语和西班牙语水平如何调节干预措施对学生阅读结果的影响。有两个重要发现。首先,样本的总体语言能力低于平均水平,这表明在有阅读困难的中年级西班牙语学生中,低 L1 和 L2 水平的普遍性可能很高。其次,我们只观察到一个显著的调节效应:在统计学上,英语水平较高的学生在字母和单词识别方面的治疗效果显著更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信