Oral health-related patterns of food selectivity among French adults

Q3 Nursing
Léo Beyer , Isabelle Maitre , Flore Lourtioux , Pierre Picouet , Adeline Braud
{"title":"Oral health-related patterns of food selectivity among French adults","authors":"Léo Beyer ,&nbsp;Isabelle Maitre ,&nbsp;Flore Lourtioux ,&nbsp;Pierre Picouet ,&nbsp;Adeline Braud","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>Food selectivity has been poorly evaluated in dental clinical populations. The frequency of oral health-related food selectivity (i.e. avoiding at least one food item due to oral discomfort) may be underestimated in adult patients with oral health needs. The present study aimed to assess food selectivity in dental and non-dental populations aged 35–65 years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The food selective behavior of dental patients recruited in a clinic (n=63) and non-dental participants recruited within the general population (n=62) was assessed by using a food selectivity questionnaire based on traditional French dishes. Food selectivity scores, their reason-why and oral characteristics were collected and submitted to a principal component analysis and a cluster analysis to identify clusters among this population. Significance levels were set at p &lt; 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty participants (24.0% of the study sample, with respectively 7 within the non-dental group and 23 within the dental group (X<sup>2</sup>=10.42, p˂0.05) reported avoiding at least one food product because of oral discomfort. Thus 11.1% of non-dental participants and 37.1% of dental patients reported oral discomfort-related food selectivity. The clustering analysis showed three patterns of food selectivity within the sample study. Among them, a cluster representing 9.6% of the sample presented the highest food selectivity (mean±SD=16.3±5.3 avoided foods) and oral discomfort-related food selectivity scores (mean±SD=11.7±5.0 avoided foods), and included dental patients with high periodontal index, high DMFT index, low teeth and OFUs numbers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings indicate that oral-discomfort related food selectivity is increased in dental patients. They suggest the need of integrated care including food intake assessment and diet advice when treating oral disease and poor oral conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"57 ","pages":"Pages 253-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000767/pdfft?md5=b3e25ded0be661ddaa1e9651fa93c75f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667268524000767-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Food selectivity has been poorly evaluated in dental clinical populations. The frequency of oral health-related food selectivity (i.e. avoiding at least one food item due to oral discomfort) may be underestimated in adult patients with oral health needs. The present study aimed to assess food selectivity in dental and non-dental populations aged 35–65 years.

Methods

The food selective behavior of dental patients recruited in a clinic (n=63) and non-dental participants recruited within the general population (n=62) was assessed by using a food selectivity questionnaire based on traditional French dishes. Food selectivity scores, their reason-why and oral characteristics were collected and submitted to a principal component analysis and a cluster analysis to identify clusters among this population. Significance levels were set at p < 0.05.

Results

Thirty participants (24.0% of the study sample, with respectively 7 within the non-dental group and 23 within the dental group (X2=10.42, p˂0.05) reported avoiding at least one food product because of oral discomfort. Thus 11.1% of non-dental participants and 37.1% of dental patients reported oral discomfort-related food selectivity. The clustering analysis showed three patterns of food selectivity within the sample study. Among them, a cluster representing 9.6% of the sample presented the highest food selectivity (mean±SD=16.3±5.3 avoided foods) and oral discomfort-related food selectivity scores (mean±SD=11.7±5.0 avoided foods), and included dental patients with high periodontal index, high DMFT index, low teeth and OFUs numbers.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that oral-discomfort related food selectivity is increased in dental patients. They suggest the need of integrated care including food intake assessment and diet advice when treating oral disease and poor oral conditions.

法国成年人与口腔健康有关的食物选择模式
背景和目的在牙科临床人群中,对食物选择性的评估很少。在有口腔健康需求的成年患者中,与口腔健康相关的食物选择性(即因口腔不适而避免食用至少一种食物)的频率可能被低估。本研究旨在评估 35-65 岁牙科和非牙科人群的食物选择性。方法通过使用基于传统法式菜肴的食物选择性调查问卷,对诊所招募的牙科患者(63 人)和普通人群中招募的非牙科参与者(62 人)的食物选择性行为进行评估。我们收集了食物选择性得分、其原因和口腔特征,并对其进行了主成分分析和聚类分析,以确定该人群中的聚类。结果30名参与者(占研究样本的24.0%,其中非牙科组7人,牙科组23人(X2=10.42,p˂0.05))表示因口腔不适而避免食用至少一种食品。因此,11.1% 的非牙科参与者和 37.1% 的牙科患者报告了与口腔不适相关的食物选择性。聚类分析显示,样本研究中有三种食物选择模式。其中,占样本 9.6% 的聚类显示出最高的食物选择性(平均值±SD=16.3±5.3 避免食用的食物)和口腔不适相关食物选择性得分(平均值±SD=11.7±5.0 避免食用的食物),包括牙周指数高、DMFT 指数高、牙齿和 OFU 数量少的牙科患者。这表明,在治疗口腔疾病和口腔状况不佳时,需要提供包括食物摄入评估和饮食建议在内的综合护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信