Inter-annual variation in movements and passage of seaward migrating European eels at a shrouded Archimedean screw pumping station

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Oliver J. Evans , Liam J. Carter , Thomas Hutchinson , Andrew Don , Rosalind M. Wright , Henrik Baktoft , Ine S. Pauwels , Jonathan D. Bolland
{"title":"Inter-annual variation in movements and passage of seaward migrating European eels at a shrouded Archimedean screw pumping station","authors":"Oliver J. Evans ,&nbsp;Liam J. Carter ,&nbsp;Thomas Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Andrew Don ,&nbsp;Rosalind M. Wright ,&nbsp;Henrik Baktoft ,&nbsp;Ine S. Pauwels ,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Bolland","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The construction of less damaging (here called fish-friendly) pumping stations has taken place in recent years, but it is unknown if they provide efficient and timely passage to migratory fish, such as European eel (<em>Anguilla anguilla</em> (L.)). The pump is often the only downstream passage route and operation, i.e., fish passage opportunity, is temporally variable depending on precipitation and prevailing river levels. Once the pumps are operating, eels must also consider the pumping station an attractive downstream passage route. Here, the movement of seaward migrating silver European eel (<em>n</em> = 59) upstream of a fish-friendly shrouded Archimedean Screw Pump (ASP) was assessed during three migrations (December–March in 2018/19, 2019/20 and 2020/21) with highly contrasting hydrology using acoustic telemetry. The overall passage rate was low (36.8 %) and minimum passage time was 65.2 days during a year with very little pump operation (2018/19), with seven eels tagged with long-life transmitters passing the pumping station the following year (2019/20). Furthermore, the median number of approaches to the pumping station was seven, with 36.8 % (<em>n</em> = 7) approaching more than 10 times. By contrast, passage rate was high (95.0 %), maximum passage time was 2.7 and 34.0 days (minimum = 3 min in both years) and all but one eel passed during the first approach during the two wettest years (2019/20 and 2020/21). Eels were almost exclusively nocturnal, regardless of pump operation, with 96.1 % of total approaches occurring between sunset and sunrise and no eels passed downstream during the day. Ultimately, limited eel passage opportunity during dry periods and a reluctance to pass when operational curtailed the effectiveness of these pumps to provide efficient and timely passage. Thus, measures are required to align pump operation with the timing of eel migration, especially in dry years, and reasons for retreat from the pumping station during operation must be identified and alleviated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002143/pdfft?md5=bda4cd04a17dac160903cf08e347cc42&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424002143-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction of less damaging (here called fish-friendly) pumping stations has taken place in recent years, but it is unknown if they provide efficient and timely passage to migratory fish, such as European eel (Anguilla anguilla (L.)). The pump is often the only downstream passage route and operation, i.e., fish passage opportunity, is temporally variable depending on precipitation and prevailing river levels. Once the pumps are operating, eels must also consider the pumping station an attractive downstream passage route. Here, the movement of seaward migrating silver European eel (n = 59) upstream of a fish-friendly shrouded Archimedean Screw Pump (ASP) was assessed during three migrations (December–March in 2018/19, 2019/20 and 2020/21) with highly contrasting hydrology using acoustic telemetry. The overall passage rate was low (36.8 %) and minimum passage time was 65.2 days during a year with very little pump operation (2018/19), with seven eels tagged with long-life transmitters passing the pumping station the following year (2019/20). Furthermore, the median number of approaches to the pumping station was seven, with 36.8 % (n = 7) approaching more than 10 times. By contrast, passage rate was high (95.0 %), maximum passage time was 2.7 and 34.0 days (minimum = 3 min in both years) and all but one eel passed during the first approach during the two wettest years (2019/20 and 2020/21). Eels were almost exclusively nocturnal, regardless of pump operation, with 96.1 % of total approaches occurring between sunset and sunrise and no eels passed downstream during the day. Ultimately, limited eel passage opportunity during dry periods and a reluctance to pass when operational curtailed the effectiveness of these pumps to provide efficient and timely passage. Thus, measures are required to align pump operation with the timing of eel migration, especially in dry years, and reasons for retreat from the pumping station during operation must be identified and alleviated.

遮蔽式阿基米德螺旋泵站向海洄游的欧洲鳗鱼的移动和通过情况的年际变化
近年来,人们开始建造破坏性较小的泵站(此处称为亲鱼泵站),但这些泵站能否为欧洲鳗鲡等洄游鱼类提供有效、及时的通道尚不得而知。水泵通常是唯一的下游通道,其运行(即鱼类通过的机会)随降水量和河流水位的变化而变化。一旦水泵运行,鳗鱼也必须将泵站视为一条有吸引力的下游通道。在此,利用声学遥测技术对欧洲银鳗(n = 59)在水文反差极大的三次洄游期间(2018/19、2019/20 和 2020/21 年的 12 月至 3 月)在鱼类友好型遮蔽式阿基米德螺旋泵(ASP)上游的活动情况进行了评估。在水泵运行很少的年份(2018/19 年),总体通过率较低(36.8%),最短通过时间为 65.2 天,次年(2019/20 年)有 7 条被长寿命发射器标记的鳗鱼通过泵站。此外,接近泵站次数的中位数为 7 次,36.8%(n = 7)接近泵站的次数超过 10 次。相比之下,鳗鱼的通过率很高(95.0%),最长通过时间分别为 2.7 天和 34.0 天(两年的最短时间均为 3 分钟),在最潮湿的两年(2019/20 和 2020/21)中,除一条鳗鱼外,所有鳗鱼均在第一次接近时通过。无论水泵运行与否,鳗鱼几乎都是夜间活动,96.1%的总接近时间发生在日落至日出之间,白天没有鳗鱼通过下游。归根结底,枯水期鳗鱼通过的机会有限,而在运行时又不愿通过,这就削弱了这些水泵提供高效和及时通过的效果。因此,需要采取措施,使水泵的运行与鳗鱼洄游的时间保持一致,尤其是在干旱年份,并且必须查明和缓解运行期间鳗鱼从泵站撤退的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信