Vegetation recovery of rehabilitated pasture at three coal mine sites following fire disturbance

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Phillip B. McKenna , David Doley , Natasha Ufer , Vanessa Glenn , Stuart Phinn , Peter D. Erskine
{"title":"Vegetation recovery of rehabilitated pasture at three coal mine sites following fire disturbance","authors":"Phillip B. McKenna ,&nbsp;David Doley ,&nbsp;Natasha Ufer ,&nbsp;Vanessa Glenn ,&nbsp;Stuart Phinn ,&nbsp;Peter D. Erskine","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable long-term use of land rehabilitated following mining is required to be resilient to fire and other disturbances. We analysed the vegetation responses to three fires in grassland pasture and open woodland on rehabilitated open-cut coal mine sites in Queensland, Australia. Two fires in central Queensland were controlled burns to manage fuel loads and test the vegetation and landform response, while the third fire, in southeastern Queensland, was an unintended wildfire. We monitored several ecological variables at the study sites for up to five years following the fires and found that vegetation cover, biomass and species richness recovered to pre-fire or unburnt control values within two years. However, one study site experienced lower than average rainfall during the three to five-year post-fire period, resulting in a significant reduction in vegetation cover of between 14 and 31 %, and biomass between 45 and 57 % compared to pre-fire values. Tree and shrub densities changed significantly at two of the sites, reflected in a 635 % increase in stem density of <em>Acacia stenophylla</em> (A.Cunn. ex Benth.) and 82 % mortality of <em>Atriplex nummularia</em> Lindl. <em>subsp. nummularia</em> individuals &lt;2 m in height and 100 % mortality in the 2-5 m height class. The results suggest that rehabilitated pasture systems in central and southern Queensland are resilient to fire in the short-term but are vulnerable to long-term shifts in climate, particularly if a fire precedes a long period of drought. Further resilience work is needed to i) compare rehabilitation recovery with unmined vegetation communities to determine residual risk of future fire impacts, ii) account for seasonality in resilience assessments and iii) understand recovery traits of seed mix combinations sourced from disparate regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002088/pdfft?md5=8b8fe19f467385a64434bfce3d01239c&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424002088-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable long-term use of land rehabilitated following mining is required to be resilient to fire and other disturbances. We analysed the vegetation responses to three fires in grassland pasture and open woodland on rehabilitated open-cut coal mine sites in Queensland, Australia. Two fires in central Queensland were controlled burns to manage fuel loads and test the vegetation and landform response, while the third fire, in southeastern Queensland, was an unintended wildfire. We monitored several ecological variables at the study sites for up to five years following the fires and found that vegetation cover, biomass and species richness recovered to pre-fire or unburnt control values within two years. However, one study site experienced lower than average rainfall during the three to five-year post-fire period, resulting in a significant reduction in vegetation cover of between 14 and 31 %, and biomass between 45 and 57 % compared to pre-fire values. Tree and shrub densities changed significantly at two of the sites, reflected in a 635 % increase in stem density of Acacia stenophylla (A.Cunn. ex Benth.) and 82 % mortality of Atriplex nummularia Lindl. subsp. nummularia individuals <2 m in height and 100 % mortality in the 2-5 m height class. The results suggest that rehabilitated pasture systems in central and southern Queensland are resilient to fire in the short-term but are vulnerable to long-term shifts in climate, particularly if a fire precedes a long period of drought. Further resilience work is needed to i) compare rehabilitation recovery with unmined vegetation communities to determine residual risk of future fire impacts, ii) account for seasonality in resilience assessments and iii) understand recovery traits of seed mix combinations sourced from disparate regions.

火灾干扰后三个煤矿矿区恢复牧场的植被恢复情况
采矿后恢复的土地需要长期可持续利用,以抵御火灾和其他干扰。我们分析了澳大利亚昆士兰州露天煤矿恢复区草地牧场和开阔林地的植被对三次火灾的反应。昆士兰中部的两场火灾是受控燃烧,目的是管理燃料负荷并测试植被和地貌反应,而昆士兰东南部的第三场火灾则是一场无意的野火。火灾发生后,我们对研究地点的几个生态变量进行了长达五年的监测,发现植被覆盖度、生物量和物种丰富度在两年内恢复到火灾前或未燃烧控制值。然而,有一个研究地点在火灾后的三至五年期间降雨量低于平均水平,导致植被覆盖率与火灾前相比大幅降低了 14% 至 31%,生物量降低了 45% 至 57%。其中两个地点的树木和灌木密度发生了显著变化,反映在相思树(A.Cunn. ex Benth.)的茎干密度增加了 635%,高度为 2 米的麻栎亚种(Atriplex nummularia Lindl.subsp.nummularia)死亡 82%,高度为 2-5 米的麻栎死亡 100%。研究结果表明,昆士兰中部和南部恢复后的牧场系统在短期内能抵御火灾,但很容易受到气候长期变化的影响,特别是如果火灾发生在长期干旱之前。需要开展进一步的复原工作,以便 i) 将复原恢复与未开采的植被群落进行比较,以确定未来火灾影响的剩余风险;ii) 在复原评估中考虑季节性;iii) 了解来自不同地区的混合种子组合的复原特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信