Non-governmental organizations, green space equity, and policy change: A national study in the US

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Alessandro Rigolon , Rexford Osei Owusu , Jennifer Leslie , Sandra Viera , Francisco Romero , Alberto Espiricueta
{"title":"Non-governmental organizations, green space equity, and policy change: A national study in the US","authors":"Alessandro Rigolon ,&nbsp;Rexford Osei Owusu ,&nbsp;Jennifer Leslie ,&nbsp;Sandra Viera ,&nbsp;Francisco Romero ,&nbsp;Alberto Espiricueta","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Worldwide, low-income and racial/ethnic minority communities tend to have a lower provision of green space than less disadvantaged groups. To address these inequities, some non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have worked on projects, such as new parks in underserved communities, and policy change, such as green space funding prioritizing underserved areas. To date, limited research has examined the landscape of NGOs working to advance green space equity via policy change. In this paper, we studied what kind of NGOs engage in green space equity policy advocacy in the US. We used topic modeling, keywords-in-context, and inferential statistics to analyze grant applications for a national initiative to fund green space equity advocacy, the first and only of its kind. We found that NGOs also advocate for several interrelated topics related to green space equity (e.g., environmental issues, social services), engage numerous policy actors in campaigns (e.g., politicians, youth), and use other strategies such as coalitions, power building, and research. NGOs working to address green space inequities also need to contend with other systemic issues affecting underserved communities (e.g., poverty, health disparities). Our findings can inform the work of public and philanthropic funders, local governments seeking partnerships with NGOs, and NGOs themselves.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724003017/pdfft?md5=1d96f2f4361f6ce56f099f63722acd44&pid=1-s2.0-S1618866724003017-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724003017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worldwide, low-income and racial/ethnic minority communities tend to have a lower provision of green space than less disadvantaged groups. To address these inequities, some non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have worked on projects, such as new parks in underserved communities, and policy change, such as green space funding prioritizing underserved areas. To date, limited research has examined the landscape of NGOs working to advance green space equity via policy change. In this paper, we studied what kind of NGOs engage in green space equity policy advocacy in the US. We used topic modeling, keywords-in-context, and inferential statistics to analyze grant applications for a national initiative to fund green space equity advocacy, the first and only of its kind. We found that NGOs also advocate for several interrelated topics related to green space equity (e.g., environmental issues, social services), engage numerous policy actors in campaigns (e.g., politicians, youth), and use other strategies such as coalitions, power building, and research. NGOs working to address green space inequities also need to contend with other systemic issues affecting underserved communities (e.g., poverty, health disparities). Our findings can inform the work of public and philanthropic funders, local governments seeking partnerships with NGOs, and NGOs themselves.

非政府组织、绿地公平和政策变化:美国全国性研究
在世界范围内,低收入社区和少数种族/族裔社区的绿地率往往低于弱势群体。为了解决这些不平等问题,一些非政府组织(NGOs)开展了一些项目,如在服务不足的社区新建公园,以及政策变革,如优先为服务不足的地区提供绿地资金。迄今为止,对通过政策变革促进绿地公平的非政府组织的研究还很有限。在本文中,我们研究了美国从事绿地公平政策倡导的非政府组织类型。我们使用了主题建模、上下文关键词和推理统计等方法,分析了一项资助绿地公平倡导的全国性倡议的拨款申请,该倡议是首个也是唯一一个此类倡议。我们发现,非政府组织也倡导与绿地公平相关的几个相互关联的主题(如环境问题、社会服务),让众多政策参与者(如政治家、青年)参与到活动中,并使用联盟、权力建设和研究等其他策略。致力于解决绿地不平等问题的非政府组织还需要应对影响服务不足社区的其他系统性问题(如贫困、健康差异)。我们的研究结果可以为公共和慈善资助者、寻求与非政府组织合作的地方政府以及非政府组织自身的工作提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信