Are separate classrooms inherently unequal? The effect of within-school sorting on the socioeconomic test score gap in Hungary

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
{"title":"Are separate classrooms inherently unequal? The effect of within-school sorting on the socioeconomic test score gap in Hungary","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates whether within-school sorting increases socioeconomic test score inequalities. Using universal test score data on 6<sup>th</sup>- and 8<sup>th</sup>-grade students in Hungary, we document the extent of within-school sorting in an institutional context where sorting based on ability or prior achievement is rare. We identify sorting schools as schools that systematically assign students with low and high socioeconomic status into different classrooms within the school. Then, exploiting school fixed effects and quasi-exogenous variation in sorting induced by enrollment and class size rules, we show that sorting has a significant and economically meaningful effect on test score inequalities between students from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Sorting harms low-status students, while high-status students gain much less, if anything, from attending sorting schools. We attribute our findings to the within-school reallocation of educational resources and differences in educational practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48261,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775724000761/pdfft?md5=1420a5fca1029344fbb45699de9d7f0f&pid=1-s2.0-S0272775724000761-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775724000761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates whether within-school sorting increases socioeconomic test score inequalities. Using universal test score data on 6th- and 8th-grade students in Hungary, we document the extent of within-school sorting in an institutional context where sorting based on ability or prior achievement is rare. We identify sorting schools as schools that systematically assign students with low and high socioeconomic status into different classrooms within the school. Then, exploiting school fixed effects and quasi-exogenous variation in sorting induced by enrollment and class size rules, we show that sorting has a significant and economically meaningful effect on test score inequalities between students from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Sorting harms low-status students, while high-status students gain much less, if anything, from attending sorting schools. We attribute our findings to the within-school reallocation of educational resources and differences in educational practices.

分班教学本身就不平等吗?校内分类对匈牙利社会经济考试分数差距的影响
本研究探讨了校内排序是否会加剧社会经济考试分数的不平等。利用匈牙利六年级和八年级学生的普遍考试分数数据,我们记录了在基于能力或先前成绩进行分班的制度背景下校内分班的程度。我们将排序学校确定为系统地将社会经济地位较低和较高的学生分配到校内不同教室的学校。然后,利用学校的固定效应以及由招生和班级规模规则引起的分班准外生性变化,我们证明分班对不同社会经济背景学生之间的考试分数不平等具有显著的经济意义。分班对地位较低的学生造成伤害,而地位较高的学生从分班学校中获得的好处要少得多。我们将研究结果归因于校内教育资源的重新分配和教育实践的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
85
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Economics of Education Review publishes research on education policy and finance, human capital production and acquisition, and the returns to human capital. We accept empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions, but the main focus of Economics of Education Review is on applied studies that employ micro data and clear identification strategies. Our goal is to publish innovative, cutting-edge research on the economics of education that is of interest to academics, policymakers and the public. Starting with papers submitted March 1, 2014, the review process for articles submitted to the Economics of Education Review will no longer be double blind. Authors are requested to include a title page with authors'' names and affiliation. Reviewers will continue to be anonymous.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信