Comparative Analysis of Laboratory-Scale Immunoglobulin G Purification Methods from Human Serum

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Louisa Bourel, Fabrice Bray, Solange Vivier, Stéphanie Flament, Lucile Guilbert, Aurélien Chepy, Christian Rolando, David Launay, Sylvain Dubucquoi and Vincent Sobanski*, 
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Laboratory-Scale Immunoglobulin G Purification Methods from Human Serum","authors":"Louisa Bourel,&nbsp;Fabrice Bray,&nbsp;Solange Vivier,&nbsp;Stéphanie Flament,&nbsp;Lucile Guilbert,&nbsp;Aurélien Chepy,&nbsp;Christian Rolando,&nbsp;David Launay,&nbsp;Sylvain Dubucquoi and Vincent Sobanski*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c0026810.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Immunoglobulin G (IgG) purification is a critical process for evaluating its role in autoimmune diseases, which are defined by the occurrence of autoantibodies. Affinity chromatography with protein G is widely considered to be the optimal technique for laboratory-scale purification. However, this technique has some limitations, including the exposure of IgG to low pH, which can compromise the quality of the purified IgG. Here, we show that alternative methods for IgG purification are possible while maintaining the quality of IgG. Different techniques for IgG purification from serum were evaluated and compared with protein G-based approaches: Melon Gel, caprylic acid-ammonium sulfate (CAAS) precipitation, anion-exchange chromatography with diethylamino ethyl (DEAE) following ammonium sulfate (AS) precipitation, and AS precipitation alone. The results demonstrated that the purification yield of these techniques surpassed that of protein G. However, differences in the purity of IgG were observed using GeLC-MS/MS. The avidity of purified IgG against selected targets (SARS-CoV-2 and topoisomerase-I) was similar between purified IgG obtained using all techniques and unpurified sera. Our work provides valuable insights for future studies of IgG function by recommending alternative purification methods that offer advantages in terms of yield, time efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and milder pH conditions than protein G.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) purification is a critical process for evaluating its role in autoimmune diseases, which are defined by the occurrence of autoantibodies. Affinity chromatography with protein G is widely considered to be the optimal technique for laboratory-scale purification. However, this technique has some limitations, including the exposure of IgG to low pH, which can compromise the quality of the purified IgG. Here, we show that alternative methods for IgG purification are possible while maintaining the quality of IgG. Different techniques for IgG purification from serum were evaluated and compared with protein G-based approaches: Melon Gel, caprylic acid-ammonium sulfate (CAAS) precipitation, anion-exchange chromatography with diethylamino ethyl (DEAE) following ammonium sulfate (AS) precipitation, and AS precipitation alone. The results demonstrated that the purification yield of these techniques surpassed that of protein G. However, differences in the purity of IgG were observed using GeLC-MS/MS. The avidity of purified IgG against selected targets (SARS-CoV-2 and topoisomerase-I) was similar between purified IgG obtained using all techniques and unpurified sera. Our work provides valuable insights for future studies of IgG function by recommending alternative purification methods that offer advantages in terms of yield, time efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and milder pH conditions than protein G.

Abstract Image

实验室规模的人血清免疫球蛋白 G 纯化方法比较分析
免疫球蛋白 G (IgG) 纯化是评估其在自身免疫性疾病中作用的关键过程,而自身免疫性疾病是由自身抗体的出现所决定的。使用蛋白 G 的亲和色谱法被广泛认为是实验室规模纯化的最佳技术。然而,这种技术也有一些局限性,包括 IgG 会暴露在低 pH 值环境中,从而影响纯化 IgG 的质量。在这里,我们展示了IgG纯化的替代方法,同时还能保持IgG的质量。我们评估了从血清中纯化 IgG 的不同技术,并与基于蛋白 G 的方法进行了比较:Melon Gel、辛酸-硫酸铵(CAAS)沉淀、硫酸铵(AS)沉淀后二乙胺基乙基(DEAE)阴离子交换色谱法以及单独的 AS 沉淀。结果表明,这些技术的纯化率都超过了蛋白 G 的纯化率。使用所有技术获得的纯化 IgG 与未纯化血清对选定靶标(SARS-CoV-2 和拓扑异构酶-I)的亲和力相似。我们的工作为未来的 IgG 功能研究提供了宝贵的见解,推荐了在产量、时间效率、成本效益和比蛋白 G 更温和的 pH 条件方面具有优势的其他纯化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信