Emergency and non-emergency routes to cancer diagnoses in 2020 and 2021: A Population-based study of 154,863 patients

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
{"title":"Emergency and non-emergency routes to cancer diagnoses in 2020 and 2021: A Population-based study of 154,863 patients","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted normal pathways to cancer diagnosis, particularly for screening and non-acute symptomatic patients. While reductions in overall cancer diagnoses have been reported elsewhere, any differential effects on emergency presentations, which are associated with poorer outcomes, have not been described.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional descriptive study from 2015 to 2021, based on International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership methods, where emergency route to diagnosis is defined as presenting as an emergency admission in the 30 days prior to cancer incidence date. Acute hospital records and cancer registrations were individually linked. Includes all individuals with a new diagnosis of specific cancers on the national cancer registry.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All cancers included showed reductions in non-emergency diagnoses in 2020, with varying recovery in 2021. The largest reductions in non-emergency diagnoses of about a third were for colorectal and cervical cancers in 2020. Non-emergency diagnoses of prostate cancer remained lower but upper GI higher in 2021. Emergency routes to diagnosis were significantly higher in 2020 for breast, cervical, colorectal and upper GI cancers and were higher in 2021 for breast and cervical cancers. The absolute magnitude of reductions in non-emergency diagnoses was greater than any increases in emergency diagnoses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In 2020, there were large reductions in numbers of cancers diagnosed through non-emergency pathways in Scotland, while those diagnosed via emergency routes fell only for prostate cancer. Some effects persisted or emerged through 2021. It is likely that opportunities to diagnose cancers in a favourable, elective manner have been lost. Further work is needed to describe outcomes among these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000365/pdfft?md5=7c58488cd2467325bf6e44c2aa0b4df0&pid=1-s2.0-S2213538324000365-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted normal pathways to cancer diagnosis, particularly for screening and non-acute symptomatic patients. While reductions in overall cancer diagnoses have been reported elsewhere, any differential effects on emergency presentations, which are associated with poorer outcomes, have not been described.

Material and methods

Cross-sectional descriptive study from 2015 to 2021, based on International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership methods, where emergency route to diagnosis is defined as presenting as an emergency admission in the 30 days prior to cancer incidence date. Acute hospital records and cancer registrations were individually linked. Includes all individuals with a new diagnosis of specific cancers on the national cancer registry.

Results

All cancers included showed reductions in non-emergency diagnoses in 2020, with varying recovery in 2021. The largest reductions in non-emergency diagnoses of about a third were for colorectal and cervical cancers in 2020. Non-emergency diagnoses of prostate cancer remained lower but upper GI higher in 2021. Emergency routes to diagnosis were significantly higher in 2020 for breast, cervical, colorectal and upper GI cancers and were higher in 2021 for breast and cervical cancers. The absolute magnitude of reductions in non-emergency diagnoses was greater than any increases in emergency diagnoses.

Conclusions

In 2020, there were large reductions in numbers of cancers diagnosed through non-emergency pathways in Scotland, while those diagnosed via emergency routes fell only for prostate cancer. Some effects persisted or emerged through 2021. It is likely that opportunities to diagnose cancers in a favourable, elective manner have been lost. Further work is needed to describe outcomes among these patients.

2020 年和 2021 年癌症诊断的急诊和非急诊途径:对 154,863 名患者进行的人口研究。
导言:COVID-19 大流行扰乱了癌症诊断的正常途径,尤其是对筛查和非急性症状患者而言。虽然其他地方也有关于癌症诊断率总体下降的报道,但对与较差预后相关的急诊就诊的不同影响却未作描述:2015-2021年横断面描述性研究,基于国际癌症基准合作组织的方法,其中急诊诊断途径定义为癌症发病日期前30天内急诊入院。急诊医院记录和癌症登记单独关联。包括全国癌症登记册中新诊断出特定癌症的所有个人:所有纳入的癌症在 2020 年的非急诊诊断率都有所下降,在 2021 年有不同程度的恢复。2020 年,结直肠癌和宫颈癌的非急诊诊断率降幅最大,约为三分之一。2021 年,前列腺癌的非急诊诊断率仍然较低,但上消化道癌的诊断率较高。2020 年,乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌和上消化道癌的急诊诊断率明显较高,2021 年,乳腺癌和宫颈癌的急诊诊断率较高。非急诊诊断减少的绝对值大于急诊诊断增加的绝对值:2020 年,苏格兰通过非急诊途径诊断的癌症数量大幅减少,而通过急诊途径诊断的癌症数量仅在前列腺癌方面有所下降。一些影响一直持续到 2021 年或有所显现。很可能已经失去了以有利的选择性方式诊断癌症的机会。还需要进一步研究这些患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信