Early-life risk factors for both infant colic and excessive crying without colic.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Karen M Switkowski, Emily Oken, Elisabeth M Simonin, Kari C Nadeau, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Jenifer R Lightdale
{"title":"Early-life risk factors for both infant colic and excessive crying without colic.","authors":"Karen M Switkowski, Emily Oken, Elisabeth M Simonin, Kari C Nadeau, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Jenifer R Lightdale","doi":"10.1038/s41390-024-03518-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infantile colic may represent gastrointestinal distress, yet most definitions emphasize excessive crying. Each may have distinct etiologies.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>In a pre-birth cohort, we used maternal reports of infant crying and apparent abdominal discomfort at 6mos to categorize infants as (1) unaffected (no excessive crying or colic), (2) excessive crying only, and (3) colic (abdominal discomfort +/- excessive crying). We examined associations of potential risk factors in separate models with excessive crying and colic (each vs. unaffected) using unadjusted multinomial logistic regression, and associations between count of risk factors and colic using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1403 infants, 140 (10%) had excessive crying, and 346 (25%) colic. Infants that were non-Hispanic white, low birthweight, firstborn, or had a maternal history of atopy, high postpartum depressive symptoms, or persistent prenatal nausea, had a 40-80% higher relative risk of colic. Preterm birth was associated with double the risk. Being firstborn, low birthweight, and preterm birth predicted excessive crying. Infants with ≥four (vs. 0-1) of the seven identified risk factors had 3.9 times (95% CI: 2.6, 6.1) higher odds of colic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colic characterized by apparent abdominal discomfort can be phenotypically distinguished from excessive crying only. Multiple risk factors may further increase colic risk.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Infant colic characterized by apparent gastrointestinal distress may be phenotypically distinct from excessive crying only. Literature that defines colic only based on crying behaviors may miss important predictors. Mother-reported colic and excessive crying appear to have overlapping risk factors, with additional risk factors identified for colic. The presence of multiple risk factors increases the risk of colic, supporting a multifactorial etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03518-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infantile colic may represent gastrointestinal distress, yet most definitions emphasize excessive crying. Each may have distinct etiologies.

Design/methods: In a pre-birth cohort, we used maternal reports of infant crying and apparent abdominal discomfort at 6mos to categorize infants as (1) unaffected (no excessive crying or colic), (2) excessive crying only, and (3) colic (abdominal discomfort +/- excessive crying). We examined associations of potential risk factors in separate models with excessive crying and colic (each vs. unaffected) using unadjusted multinomial logistic regression, and associations between count of risk factors and colic using logistic regression.

Results: Of 1403 infants, 140 (10%) had excessive crying, and 346 (25%) colic. Infants that were non-Hispanic white, low birthweight, firstborn, or had a maternal history of atopy, high postpartum depressive symptoms, or persistent prenatal nausea, had a 40-80% higher relative risk of colic. Preterm birth was associated with double the risk. Being firstborn, low birthweight, and preterm birth predicted excessive crying. Infants with ≥four (vs. 0-1) of the seven identified risk factors had 3.9 times (95% CI: 2.6, 6.1) higher odds of colic.

Conclusions: Colic characterized by apparent abdominal discomfort can be phenotypically distinguished from excessive crying only. Multiple risk factors may further increase colic risk.

Impact: Infant colic characterized by apparent gastrointestinal distress may be phenotypically distinct from excessive crying only. Literature that defines colic only based on crying behaviors may miss important predictors. Mother-reported colic and excessive crying appear to have overlapping risk factors, with additional risk factors identified for colic. The presence of multiple risk factors increases the risk of colic, supporting a multifactorial etiology.

Abstract Image

婴儿肠绞痛和无肠绞痛时过度哭闹的早期生活风险因素。
背景:婴儿肠绞痛可能代表肠胃不适,但大多数定义都强调过度哭闹。每种病因都可能不同:在一个出生前队列中,我们利用母亲对婴儿6个月时哭闹和明显腹部不适的报告,将婴儿分为(1)未受影响(无过度哭闹或肠绞痛)、(2)仅过度哭闹和(3)肠绞痛(腹部不适 +/- 过度哭闹)。我们使用未经调整的多项式逻辑回归法在不同模型中检验了潜在风险因素与过度哭闹和肠绞痛(各自与未受影响)之间的关联,并使用逻辑回归法检验了风险因素计数与肠绞痛之间的关联:结果:1403 名婴儿中有 140 名(10%)过度哭闹,346 名(25%)肠绞痛。非西班牙裔白人、出生体重低、头胎、母亲有过敏史、产后抑郁症状严重或产前持续恶心的婴儿患肠绞痛的相对风险高出 40-80%。早产的风险则高出一倍。头胎、低出生体重和早产都会导致婴儿过度哭闹。在已确定的七种风险因素中,≥四种(与0-1种相比)的婴儿发生肠绞痛的几率要高出3.9倍(95% CI:2.6, 6.1):结论:以明显腹部不适为特征的肠绞痛在表型上可与过度哭闹区分开来。多种风险因素可能会进一步增加肠绞痛的风险:影响:以明显胃肠道不适为特征的婴儿肠绞痛在表型上可能有别于过度哭闹。仅根据哭闹行为定义肠绞痛的文献可能会遗漏重要的预测因素。母亲报告的肠绞痛和过度哭闹似乎有重叠的风险因素,肠绞痛还有其他风险因素。多种风险因素的存在增加了腹绞痛的风险,支持多因素病因学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信